Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nadine_mn

(3,702 posts)
56. Thank you for reading it
Mon Nov 13, 2017, 10:52 AM
Nov 2017

I realize I probably should have worded it better but it was early in the morning and I was frustrated that I felt the consent issued was being overshadowed by penis aesthetics.

I have a tendency to argue in my head and assume every one else knows the whole argument.

The idiosyncrasies of a rare individual does not negate the greater truth or greater good Not Ruth Nov 2017 #1
By making the issue about the aesthetics of a body part rather than consent to view it nadine_mn Nov 2017 #4
no kidding. Voltaire2 Nov 2017 #7
Agree. Bizarre. My husband's pushing up against me at the Hortensis Nov 2017 #13
From some of the conversations on Twitter... forgotmylogin Nov 2017 #54
Lol. So agree. Except instead of clueless I'd say "hostile." Hortensis Nov 2017 #74
Yeah, that is interesting. forgotmylogin Nov 2017 #75
Yes, you'd think that pretty much goes without saying. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #33
i think everyone knows it's about consent since the cases where that is said JI7 Nov 2017 #2
There have been comments on many threads that nadine_mn Nov 2017 #5
not really. this is like arguing all lives matter when someone says "black lives matter" JI7 Nov 2017 #6
This has nothing to do with the argument "black lives matter" meaning nadine_mn Nov 2017 #11
within the context of no consent. it's like bringing up all lives matter because JI7 Nov 2017 #12
No I am not changing the subject nadine_mn Nov 2017 #31
I have seen the same comments Nadine_M saw emulatorloo Nov 2017 #84
The reason for that statement (and yes, it's oversimplified) The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2017 #63
Yes, thank you. No one on that other thread, including me, was leaving consent out of Nay Nov 2017 #73
Well said. lillypaddle Nov 2017 #3
Agreed malaise Nov 2017 #8
All of the threads, including mine, ARE about consent obamanut2012 Nov 2017 #9
No I don't know that nadine_mn Nov 2017 #10
You should know that. This requiring a million words of explanation is ridiculous. boston bean Nov 2017 #16
Why do I always agree with what you say ? :) Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2017 #17
So when a poster replies nadine_mn Nov 2017 #19
No woman she has ever known has done so. What is so difficult about this. boston bean Nov 2017 #23
She continues to make the argument that because she never would nadine_mn Nov 2017 #29
it is a minority of people who welcome an unwelcome dick pic. boston bean Nov 2017 #30
again you are missing the argument that has been made by some nadine_mn Nov 2017 #32
For an opinion of one woman, woman must speak a million words to further explain an obvious point. boston bean Nov 2017 #36
are you deliberately being obtuse? nadine_mn Nov 2017 #38
My point is that is what most women are speaking about. To take one comment and attempt to make boston bean Nov 2017 #41
No - I still don't understand where you find me disagreeing with nadine_mn Nov 2017 #43
Right and to make women have to explain they aren't meaning they are speaking for every woman boston bean Nov 2017 #44
But when said woman is stating that she is speaking for every woman nadine_mn Nov 2017 #45
I don't think I ever said consent could not be given because of the nature of the subect. boston bean Nov 2017 #46
Oh my god...you are missing the point nadine_mn Nov 2017 #47
agreed Skittles Nov 2017 #76
If you don't know that, that's your problem. kcr Nov 2017 #58
I just went to obamanut's thread. kcr Nov 2017 #72
It's kind of mind boggling that you don't see the irony here mythology Nov 2017 #66
You're being terminally literal Boomer Nov 2017 #14
Love that term "terminally literal" +1 Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2017 #18
I am 100% in agreement that no one wants to see your dick means don't send unsolicited nadine_mn Nov 2017 #20
It is they who need a lesson. Not the other way around. boston bean Nov 2017 #24
how is it making a woman go in a million miles nadine_mn Nov 2017 #28
You have it exactly right... your points are very well taken. InAbLuEsTaTe Nov 2017 #37
Thank you - you understand my point nadine_mn Nov 2017 #40
I understand your point as well. The issue is consent, not pictures or penis aesthetics emulatorloo Nov 2017 #85
Having an account on an online dating site is not consent either crazycatlady Nov 2017 #15
Even if you were once in a relationship with someone nadine_mn Nov 2017 #22
#notalldicks WhiskeyGrinder Nov 2017 #21
My point is about consent nadine_mn Nov 2017 #25
Any dick whipped out on the street, office, carnival, beach, etc is an ugly dick. boston bean Nov 2017 #26
Agreed blueinredohio Nov 2017 #34
Who specifically is arguing that it is not in fact, about consent? LanternWaste Nov 2017 #35
Ok here is where I am banging my head nadine_mn Nov 2017 #42
Are they just randomly, out of the blue, bringing up the subject of dick picks? kcr Nov 2017 #62
THANK YOU. Scoopster Nov 2017 #27
I like a nice penis. NCTraveler Nov 2017 #39
I am here to unleash a wave of snark Orrex Nov 2017 #48
Thank you for reading it nadine_mn Nov 2017 #56
I think that you make strong points Orrex Nov 2017 #60
this thread did not disappoint bigtree Nov 2017 #49
Of course. It's always about consent. MineralMan Nov 2017 #50
I know that is what you mean, and what the majority of people mean nadine_mn Nov 2017 #53
I really don't think any of us is really talking about dick photos. MineralMan Nov 2017 #57
100% this obamanut2012 Nov 2017 #83
the bottom line is consent (slight trigger warning) DonCoquixote Nov 2017 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author MrsCoffee Nov 2017 #52
I agree. Body parts should be displayed by mutual agreement only. Irish_Dem Nov 2017 #55
Edited because I think this is a misunderstanding kcr Nov 2017 #59
I know this was about Samantha Bee's spiel. moriah Nov 2017 #68
Yep. I'm not surprised it's generating a #notallpenises movement. kcr Nov 2017 #71
No. I sent you a message hoping to clarify better nadine_mn Nov 2017 #79
And I'm sorry, but I stand by my mine. No one said they're inherently disgusting. kcr Nov 2017 #82
Of course it's about consent. The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2017 #61
is this a circumcision thread? snooper2 Nov 2017 #64
No one wants to see an *unwanted* dick. moriah Nov 2017 #65
Exactly, this isnt hard. nt stevenleser Nov 2017 #78
So to speak... mt The_jackalope Nov 2017 #80
I'm just amazed that we have to have this discussion MosheFeingold Nov 2017 #67
In my profession as a nurse Ive seen thousands and thousands of dicks ismnotwasm Nov 2017 #69
I think the problem is the "all" of any group being discussed whether it be women, men, jalan48 Nov 2017 #70
Excellent points, Nadine. My lover/husband, absolutely yes. My baby boy: so darling. Hekate Nov 2017 #77
Yay for sanity! Thanks, nadine_mn! nt The_jackalope Nov 2017 #81
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could we please stop with...»Reply #56