Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: President Obama's Disingenuous Attack on Outsourcing [View all]Edweird
(8,570 posts)70. There is no 'cheering' by me here.
Last edited Wed Jul 18, 2012, 02:03 PM - Edit history (1)
No matter how you may wish it so, it just isn't the case.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
231 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Brilliant duck, even for you, Sid. I guess you can't defend Mr. Immelt. I wouldn't try, either. nt
Romulox
Jul 2012
#14
Why did this administration appoint Republicans to the President's cabinet? Are you saying
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#131
Letting Global Oil Cartels have more access to our resources is not 'outsourcing'?
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#229
And the question then becomes when will "enough be enough"? Short, sweet, and to the point.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#46
So.. you're not against RW policy from 'dems', just offended that someone you consider RW
Edweird
Jul 2012
#34
FUDrs work thsi board HARD! Thx for your insght, I don't think I can believe them at all...
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#61
I am stating clearly (no need to imply) that I am against RW policy without regard to the source.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#64
Sometimes the truth is very painful and there are many here that are very disappointed
Bandit
Jul 2012
#3
This sounds FUDr-ish, at the least assume Obama is a dictator and congress is something he can
uponit7771
Jul 2012
#4
Well, I don't have any way to refute this. Is it ok to cast aspersions against the OP, instead?
Romulox
Jul 2012
#8
Surely people are not gullible enough to fall for this obvious a ruse?
Egalitarian Thug
Jul 2012
#101
Absolutely not. Election year is the MOST important time to speak up.
woo me with science
Jul 2012
#16
You are full of shit if you think it is "OK" to cozy up to a right wing shill
emulatorloo
Jul 2012
#142
You asked, "Do you want repug Romney appointing their replacements with more right wingers like
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#86
"I'ld rather that Obama would do that." Which is bullshit speculation that
emulatorloo
Jul 2012
#176
No matter how many times you use the word "bullshit," Kagan's positions on criminal cases is coming
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#188
Kagan was your attempt to change the subject from me calling you on your speculative bullshit.
emulatorloo
Jul 2012
#192
But for how much longer? This is against Skinner's own mission statement. How much longer?
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#49
But with or without the use of rightwing sources, Skinner has to have recognized the pattern.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#77
"The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part..."
Romulox
Jul 2012
#82
I don't think it's disingenuous if he's trying to do something about the problem.
RedStateLiberal
Jul 2012
#22
Then going back to your origional statement in which you said that you don't think it's disingenuous
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#98
3rd way/new 'dem' garbage is about RW policy. This and the individual mandate are prime examples.
Edweird
Jul 2012
#32
Post right wing sources to attack President Obama and this is what I see/hear
stevenleser
Jul 2012
#38
Unless Kucinich or Nader is running... am I to assume the purists are voting for Romney???
progressivebydesign
Jul 2012
#58
Why are you attacking THE Democratic candidate during a presidential campaign??
kestrel91316
Jul 2012
#63
K n R. Apparently our side is as susceptible to candidates' pandering as theirs.
Lionessa
Jul 2012
#76
For some, as you can readily see, speaking the truth is overrated. But I thank you.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#94
If there is to be a choice between the truth and disingenuous ad hominem attacks on truth tellers,
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2012
#99
Um, no. I like the 'blue links'. So I'll ask again, why did this administration appoint Republicans
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#134
Yes, facts do come in handy especially when there are those who try to deflect from
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#136
My question was 'why did this administration appoint Republicans to his cabinet'
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#138
True, but I am astounded by what has been revealed in this thread. From the same people
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#228
Wow, that's a remarkably unwarranted celebration you are having there with your friends.
woo me with science
Jul 2012
#133
Prosense, didn't you know that squatting in parks and disavowing politics is the wave of the future?
dionysus
Jul 2012
#144
You said that, not I. I am a Democrat because I despise Republicans and do not want them in
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#199
I, as a Democrat, more than 'tend to leave Republicans out and to exclude them as they do to us'.
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#202
So you too agree with Dems appointing Republicans to positions of power after we throw them out?
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#162
Sabrina - lets have a nice discussion without "litmus tests" as to who is a "better" Democrat.
emulatorloo
Jul 2012
#166
We disagree. Gates is a war monger and a liar. No Democrat should appoint someone
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#179
It is ok to disagree. As to your original question, long tradition of appointees from another party
emulatorloo
Jul 2012
#189
Yes, I am aware, and even support, cooperation between the two parties. But we are talking about
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#204
what's "desperate" is, the "dems" who are so upset that obama's going to have another 4 years, they
dionysus
Jul 2012
#148
he does have a point. Democrats have supported outsourcing and predatory capitalism. However, if I
Douglas Carpenter
Jul 2012
#161
It's outright attempts at suppression, and against the TOS. I don't get it.
Tarheel_Dem
Jul 2012
#177
You were doing okay up to your last paragraph, which is something you apparently made up
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#225
So again, you have not explained this. Why do you support putting Republicans in
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#207
Hey Sid, why won't answer the question? Do you support Republicans being given
sabrina 1
Jul 2012
#212
"Or are you disputing the fact that Immelt was appointed to this president's cabinet? "..
SidDithers
Jul 2012
#213