Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
271. I agree, and for the same reason.
Fri Sep 29, 2017, 01:23 PM
Sep 2017

However, that is up to the states.

Caucuses are paid for by the party, and primaries are paid for by the state, so that's one reason some states do it.

It absolutely isn't the time to relitigate the primaries. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #1
The Dems lost because of voter suppression, which deprived us of millions of votes; pnwmom Sep 2017 #7
Sure. That accounts for some of it. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #20
Have you been reading about what the Russians were doing on Twitter and Facebook pnwmom Sep 2017 #31
Opposing side buys ads that target the other side! Film at 11 Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #130
The Russians aren't part of the "opposing side." At least they're not supposed to be. pnwmom Sep 2017 #138
Yeah, they are not supposed to be but they are. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #141
With the election as close as it was, the Russian micro-targeted Facebook ads, pnwmom Sep 2017 #146
Agree 100% Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #147
So you're saying that they are a big reason that the election was so close? ehrnst Sep 2017 #266
Nah that was baked in. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #269
What was "baked in?" (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #273
I see your google is broken. Maybe someone else can jump in. I gotta run. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #286
Scared to answer.... ehrnst Sep 2017 #291
well, brer cat Sep 2017 #172
Figuring out how Dems lost Wisconsin in 2010 delisen Sep 2017 #175
Why the election was so close has been discussed here. ehrnst Sep 2017 #261
So a record high unfavorable rating had nothing to do with it? Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #263
And still - she pulled in more votes than any POTUS candidate but BHO ehrnst Sep 2017 #264
Oh yeah, the big nothingburger. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #268
You mean like way back in 2012? ehrnst Sep 2017 #274
I don't need a calculator. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #276
I guess cognitive dissonance overrides math. ehrnst Sep 2017 #277
Yeah, math like in 1984 when the population was around 2/3rds the present population. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #282
Um... did I say 1984? ehrnst Sep 2017 #285
Positively Orwellian George II Sep 2017 #297
The population of the US in 1984 was about 20 million MORE than "2/3rds the present population" George II Sep 2017 #287
The population of the US was in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, etc. was "1//3rd or 1/2" the population... George II Sep 2017 #281
He was making a comparison that she won more votes than ANY presidential candidate. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #283
Oh, I'm caught up alright - but you misstated what SHE said. George II Sep 2017 #284
The desperation to "be the one who's right!!!" ehrnst Sep 2017 #289
Ironic, isn't it? George II Sep 2017 #290
Um - you need to go back and read the thread. ehrnst Sep 2017 #288
+1,000,000 George II Sep 2017 #298
Of course she got more votes "ever" because the U.S. population is the largest "ever" Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #304
Not a meaningless statistic at all - unless you are talking about how likeable HRC is. ehrnst Sep 2017 #317
First, people don't consider a candidate's unfavorable rating when voting, but if they did... George II Sep 2017 #275
Yep. Trump had a high unfavorable rating. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #278
So, if we use your rationale regarding unfavorable ratings, how did Clinton lose? George II Sep 2017 #279
Her favorability ratings were very high radical noodle Sep 2017 #295
Oh right... ehrnst Sep 2017 #280
+1 sheshe2 Sep 2017 #315
She DID crush him! She received more votes than any white candidate in history lunamagica Sep 2017 #98
And don't forget the 25 years the GOP luvtheGWN Sep 2017 #108
Admirable that Hillary unilaterally disclosed all that... but, was it smart politically? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #179
Are you saying this about her tax returns? ehrnst Sep 2017 #254
I don't really get what you are saying here. Do you mean that it is better to be shady and/or lunamagica Sep 2017 #294
Damn straight. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #265
+1 sheshe2 Sep 2017 #316
Exactly! Unfortunately, there will ALWAYS be third-party candidates running... InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #177
Not very successfully - well without help from Russia, anyway. ehrnst Sep 2017 #255
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #260
Hillary is a "ball buster?" What does that even mean? (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #262
I guess she threatened his masculinity. JHan Sep 2017 #293
totally agree...a perfect storm... samnsara Sep 2017 #87
Straw man again. Understanding what happened is vital to making sure ehrnst Sep 2017 #12
Where did I say anything about "being divisive"? Speaking of strawmen. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #16
Well, passive aggressive divisiveness is still divisiveness ehrnst Sep 2017 #79
+1,000 NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #127
Whose relitigating primaries? Adrahil Sep 2017 #21
I'm responding to the OP Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #24
You keep saying that. So how are the primaries being re-litigated? I just don't see it. George II Sep 2017 #72
I keep saying it because it's true. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #78
The OP pointedly says that this is NOT the time to re-litigate the primaries, and he/she isn't. George II Sep 2017 #85
And I pointedly agreed with that in my subject line. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #94
The OP does rehash the primaries. DLevine Sep 2017 #95
True, but it's WAY past time to re-litigate what we STAND FOR as a party. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #182
That has already happened. George II Sep 2017 #184
Oh yeah, you're right, forgot about the Democratic leadership's promotion of their "Better Deal." InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #192
You mean like HRC did? Good luck. ehrnst Sep 2017 #292
It's re-litigation to keep arguing that Bernie shouldn't have been allowed in the primaries. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #107
WHERE? I can't locate where it says that. Is that actually a part of the OP? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #136
I didn't claim it was in the OP. I was talking about the general concept of re-litigation. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #164
Why bring it up? It's a straw man and distraction... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #166
What does this have to do with the OP? ehrnst Sep 2017 #173
Nothing. Nothing at all. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #189
I agree... we just need to make adjustments to guarantee the primary process is fair going forward. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #183
What adjustments do we need to make? (tn) ehrnst Sep 2017 #204
I'd like to get rid of caucuses. They restict voting to the privileged few. lapucelle Sep 2017 #270
I agree, and for the same reason. ehrnst Sep 2017 #271
Absolutely yes ... I've always hated that system... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #318
How about this...no non-Democrat can ever run in the Democratic Primary going forward. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #322
Possibly sanders-progressives can also change delisen Sep 2017 #26
Sure Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #33
Change is the problem. kstewart33 Sep 2017 #48
I'm seeing different stats for the percentage of non-elderly Americans with employer-bases insurance femmedem Sep 2017 #97
Thanks for posting this. kstewart33 Sep 2017 #114
That number might be "90% of nonelderly/child with ins. get it through their employer" ehrnst Sep 2017 #186
I don't see anything even remotely re-litigating the primaries in the OP. Where is that? George II Sep 2017 #43
I was responding LITERALLY to the penultimate paragraph of the OP Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #50
Perhaps if people hadn't told them that both parties were the same Ninsianna Sep 2017 #248
Cuthbert, yes, the primaries ARE over, and it's 2018 time. Hortensis Sep 2017 #56
No one has ever pretended that. One of the major issues right now Ninsianna Sep 2017 #58
The first thing I said at my Democrats Central committee meeting Delmette2.0 Sep 2017 #100
The first think I think when I hear Bernie Sanders macandsandy Sep 2017 #106
Thank you Delmette2.0 Sep 2017 #112
And Hillary - with her decades of effective service and activism ehrnst Sep 2017 #237
Hmmm, New York. I wonder how much it's going to be, would love to see them. George II Sep 2017 #239
Awesome! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #240
In one day the Clinton Foundation does more for people in need than any Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #243
All the issues you mentioned are of vital importance. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #242
. George II Sep 2017 #246
When did HRC "oppose" a $15 minimum? ehrnst Sep 2017 #272
Current and ongoing issues are not re litigating the primaries. There are no Blank Checks. Lil Missy Sep 2017 #135
Just NO. nocoincidences Sep 2017 #2
re: the author of this 'article' ... rog Sep 2017 #3
And since he appears on Fox News his views are illegitimate? factfinder_77 Sep 2017 #14
Here's his bio ehrnst Sep 2017 #17
"Destroys Tucker Carlson", I like the way that sounds. George II Sep 2017 #241
Democrats regularly appear on Fox News, it's been happening since it's inception. George II Sep 2017 #46
How interesting, know who also regularly appears on Fox news? Ninsianna Sep 2017 #71
That's an irrefutable fact and undeniable bit of reality... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #76
Nina Turner appears on FoxNews.... (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #205
Bernie isn't "ripping our party apart." Get a grip. Vinca Sep 2017 #4
But he's not a democrat, dontcha know.... pangaia Sep 2017 #102
I was afraid someone wasn't going to bring that up ProfessorPlum Sep 2017 #191
Stop. LakeArenal Sep 2017 #5
He is only "tearing the Democratic party apart" in the wild imaginations of a bitter minority. phleshdef Sep 2017 #6
Hmmm Clinton is the hardest worker I know delisen Sep 2017 #27
I never said she wasn't and I like her. phleshdef Sep 2017 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author m-lekktor Sep 2017 #151
Actually, Bernie is doing more to bring the party together post-election than is Hillary. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #180
?????????????? heaven05 Sep 2017 #193
Can you give an example of how he is doing that?(nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #208
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #230
Her book tour is divisive? ehrnst Sep 2017 #236
Amazing accusations and insults. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #253
Actually, that's not true. Unless 'unity" now means be as divisive as possible by Ninsianna Sep 2017 #249
Define "normal Democrat" please. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #207
I'll give you a hint... its not DU web warriors like ourselves. phleshdef Sep 2017 #221
That's a hint, not an answer. ehrnst Sep 2017 #223
I could, but I usually refuse to answer questions that common sense can answer. phleshdef Sep 2017 #224
So you don't have an answer to back up your remark about "normal Democrats" ehrnst Sep 2017 #225
I do. And you know the answer. But you are being annoying on purpose. phleshdef Sep 2017 #226
I'm not the one saying things I can't back up. ehrnst Sep 2017 #227
Lol, you THINK you called me out. That's cute. phleshdef Sep 2017 #232
Can't walk away, can you? ehrnst Sep 2017 #233
I'm thin skinned? phleshdef Sep 2017 #234
Hey, you were the one who brought it up ehrnst Sep 2017 #235
No one "needs to put their money where their mouth is"... phleshdef Sep 2017 #238
Oh. Now we've resorted to going ad Hominem. ehrnst Sep 2017 #251
Your entire existence in this exchange is the epitome of ad hominem... phleshdef Sep 2017 #256
"I know you are but what am I?" ehrnst Sep 2017 #257
A legend in your own mind. phleshdef Sep 2017 #258
Well, I guess that settles it! ehrnst Sep 2017 #259
Beware: Thou Shalt Not Speak Ill of the Senator from Vermont MineralMan Sep 2017 #8
IF OP didnt know before, they do now. GONE Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #60
It appears that the poster used up his last hidden post. MineralMan Sep 2017 #61
I will take zero glee when I am proven to be correct about what I have said and predicted Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #65
So you actually believe that these 'Hillary BASHERS", on this site, cost her the election? Fix The Stupid Sep 2017 #185
no heaven05 Sep 2017 #195
And when will HRC supporters have to do this? zipplewrath Sep 2017 #9
HRC stated that she will not run again. So battling on her behalf is kind of a moot topic now. TheBlackAdder Sep 2017 #22
Guess we need to address Russia, Naziism delisen Sep 2017 #29
But just look at all the nice little clickies it gets.. pangaia Sep 2017 #105
Zip, you're making WAYYY too much sense... we either unite or die as a party. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #181
Hillary isn't running again. She does, however speak for ehrnst Sep 2017 #188
I don't think he has the power or influence to rip our party apart. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #10
+1000 ehrnst Sep 2017 #13
Sanders-don't see a revolutionary. I see a reformer delisen Sep 2017 #32
Sanders himself sees it differently. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #34
His group is called "Our Revolution", not "Our Reformation". George II Sep 2017 #49
Nailed it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #62
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #187
LOL, how do you say corporations in Latin? R B Garr Sep 2017 #196
Believe it or not, "corporations". They probably didn't exist when Latin was created.... George II Sep 2017 #197
I was actually thinking that, too! R B Garr Sep 2017 #198
"yelling at walls" Me. Sep 2017 #82
Good post...coming from a Sanders fan. Not that I agree with everything in it, but the notion JCanete Sep 2017 #122
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #11
It's posts like this that rip our party apart. panader0 Sep 2017 #15
Well, that's rich. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #23
another anti bernie post sigh dembotoz Sep 2017 #18
This is as annoying as the posters who post nothing but 'pro-Sanders' articles. SharonClark Sep 2017 #19
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #25
This OP does neither of those things. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #37
For your edification... tonedevil Sep 2017 #38
That's nice. Nobody is being "bashed" in the OP. Someone's behavior... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #45
Perhaps you should ask... tonedevil Sep 2017 #47
The OP stands, and there you have it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #53
The op is now ffr. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #52
The OP stands, and there you have it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #54
The poster is gone, tonedevil Sep 2017 #57
Yes. It must have been something else. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #59
Whatever it takes. /nt tonedevil Sep 2017 #67
And this OP remains. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #70
EH, there is another new person on the same "mission" who will take up the slack!nt m-lekktor Sep 2017 #152
What mission? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #162
How do you relitigate that which has not been litigated? delisen Sep 2017 #42
That's an interesting question. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #110
NJ, I often disagree with your positions but I always admire your rhetorical skill ... philly_bob Sep 2017 #149
Thanks... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #160
That's a curious post. George II Sep 2017 #69
Oh for fuck's sake STAAAAAAAAAAHHHP. HughBeaumont Sep 2017 #30
Of course he bears responsibility, just as alll delisen Sep 2017 #40
I agree 100% ... It's all true! Thanks for sharing this! NurseJackie Sep 2017 #35
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #41
Well melman Sep 2017 #36
Well damn, MuseRider Sep 2017 #51
He disrupted poorly. LAGC Sep 2017 #66
No it didn't, it's still there. George II Sep 2017 #74
Some helpful links melman Sep 2017 #89
Why are you so happy? George II Sep 2017 #91
Happy? melman Sep 2017 #92
That is what I want to know. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #113
Is it really? melman Sep 2017 #118
I dont understand being gleeful when a loyal Democrat is silenced Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #120
That's one way to look at it melman Sep 2017 #134
Please exapand on that. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #140
What's the point? melman Sep 2017 #200
I guess argument by innuendo is a thing now. ehrnst Sep 2017 #209
Okay melman Sep 2017 #216
If there is more than one person looking at any situation there just might be Autumn Sep 2017 #199
Seriously melman Sep 2017 #201
That's a refreshing change, Autumn. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #210
A novel idea eh ehrnst. nt Autumn Sep 2017 #212
Well it's certainly preferable to panties getting in wads over fact checking. ehrnst Sep 2017 #215
Facts are facts and they often get checked. Autumn Sep 2017 #217
But beware the fact check on the wrong career politician... ehrnst Sep 2017 #218
I know what you mean, it happens you look back realize career politicians change. Autumn Sep 2017 #219
And there are those that claim that never changing one's mind over the course ehrnst Sep 2017 #220
Fact... sheshe2 Sep 2017 #228
Surely You Can Guess Me. Sep 2017 #144
Such a shame, and that's a fact. Autumn Sep 2017 #123
I am sad. m-lekktor Sep 2017 #153
Brave Me. Sep 2017 #39
K&R... revmclaren Sep 2017 #44
That's more than 3 paragraphs. nt. druidity33 Sep 2017 #55
I don't feel ripped apart. ananda Sep 2017 #63
Another repeat? guillaumeb Sep 2017 #64
Writer M.S. Hopkins is labeled as "Opinion Contributor" in his byline by The Hill, philly_bob Sep 2017 #68
Michele Alexander, "The New Jim Crow" Jopin Klobe Sep 2017 #73
Um, HRC was realistically the only candidate who was fighting for greater equality Ninsianna Sep 2017 #84
There's pragmatic, and then there's dismissive. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #109
Look forward, Ken. Look forward. Stop focusing on the past. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #117
I am looking forward. We can't MOVE forward as a party Ken Burch Sep 2017 #165
The primary is over. The voters decided. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #168
Bless you. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #203
I appreciate that. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #296
The block of voters that we need to take seriously in 2018 and 2020 sheshe2 Sep 2017 #132
Preach girl, preach! NurseJackie Sep 2017 #299
Hey! Thanks! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #300
She was being dismissed constantly for stating facts that even Bernie knew Ninsianna Sep 2017 #159
Thank you! NurseJackie Sep 2017 #229
Exactly, thank you! R B Garr Sep 2017 #267
She said precisely the opposite in her interview with Chris Hayes BainsBane Sep 2017 #143
"Attacks from Sanders and his supporters on Democrats aren't helping to rebuild the party, ... Lil Missy Sep 2017 #75
It hurts us and makes me wonder who these supporters are? Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #323
Your posts are far more divisive Fiendish Thingy Sep 2017 #77
+100. True. Duppers Sep 2017 #80
Because the article shared is not supportive of Bernie Sanders? ehrnst Sep 2017 #81
Really? How so? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #90
Agree. nt DLevine Sep 2017 #96
How so? sheshe2 Sep 2017 #142
Still waiting for clarification. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #211
We see Bernie very differently. That's a fact. Can we still UNITE? Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #83
i just wonder how the hell both parties are.... samnsara Sep 2017 #86
No Interloper Whatsoever! Me. Sep 2017 #145
The Hill loves to dig at Democrats & stir things up. You took the bait. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2017 #88
I stand with Bernie and the Democrats! tecelote Sep 2017 #93
This breaks the four paragraph rule. pangaia Sep 2017 #99
Oh dear! Now what? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #103
No emotion at all in my comment. Just a fact. pangaia Sep 2017 #119
Nobody is ridiculing you. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #124
If the Gif... tonedevil Sep 2017 #125
Oh well. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #131
The poster is no longer around to edit it. Autumn Sep 2017 #154
Oh. pangaia Sep 2017 #156
... Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2017 #101
Oh geeze! Here we go again. Stirring the pot. left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #104
It's actually to the point Plucketeer Sep 2017 #115
I'm sick of these daily attacks left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #116
Nobody is being attacked... only the behavior and actions criticized. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #128
Oh looky ! left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #148
You may ignore me ... but ignoring the truth won't change it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #158
I think that many here confuse criticism of Sanders ehrnst Sep 2017 #213
... LiberalLovinLug Sep 2017 #111
I hate these sort of headlines Dem2 Sep 2017 #121
K&R Gothmog Sep 2017 #126
Talking about social equality WinstonSmith00 Sep 2017 #129
LOL-fresh off his appearance in the debate it's time to bash Bernie again. jalan48 Sep 2017 #133
Nobody is doing that. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #169
Starting to get old... time to move on ya think?!?! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #231
He Isn't! annarbor Sep 2017 #137
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #139
I too am tired of these threads, but this one was better than most philly_bob Sep 2017 #150
Well I guess it might be true that one side has to blink. Exultant Democracy Sep 2017 #155
Bernie isn't ripping the party apart. He's helping the Democratic party aikoaiko Sep 2017 #157
We see Bernie very differently. That's a fact. Can we still UNITE? Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #174
Not with OPs like this. Someone the OP respects need to let them they are now the problem. aikoaiko Sep 2017 #222
Ahhhhhh, so no uniting? Hmmmmmm? Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #245
My point is the OP *is* not uniting. aikoaiko Sep 2017 #247
Woah! Again we DO see Bernie very differently. Like polar opposites. That's really a fact. Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #250
But he doesn't have a "D" behind his name. romanic Sep 2017 #206
Because he is not a Democrat. democratisphere Sep 2017 #161
I Can Understand You Saying That Me. Sep 2017 #163
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2017 #167
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #170
K&R betsuni Sep 2017 #171
Because he wants to be President. PubliusEnigma Sep 2017 #176
Why are some people here ripping our party apart? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #178
this is the kind of post that might cause a lot of ignoring ProfessorPlum Sep 2017 #190
Attention? LexVegas Sep 2017 #194
How much is the DU anti-Bernie lotto up to now? If it's over $500 million bagelsforbreakfast Sep 2017 #202
It seems to explode when any criticism of the Senator is uttered. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #214
This Thread Is Still Going? Me. Sep 2017 #244
Agreed ! left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #301
:) sheshe2 Sep 2017 #303
Personally Me. Sep 2017 #305
I am cool with it. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #307
Bernie joined the Dems... Mike Nelson Sep 2017 #252
The Clinton's and Al Gore ran on progressive ideas way back a quarter of a century ago. R B Garr Sep 2017 #329
That's true, and... Mike Nelson Sep 2017 #331
Kick! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #302
I'll Join You Me. Sep 2017 #306
Thanks....Hey me...look what I found. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #308
Perfect Me. Sep 2017 #309
Thanks... sheshe2 Sep 2017 #310
Tomorrow.... Me. Sep 2017 #311
I guess that depends on our time zones. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #312
Well Then... Me. Sep 2017 #313
Me thinks a Will Pitt. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #314
Mornin' sheshe Me. Sep 2017 #319
Morning me! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #320
Well Lookee Here Me. Sep 2017 #321
Morning, me treestar Sep 2017 #325
That's A Good...Yes? Me. Sep 2017 #326
Yes. treestar Sep 2017 #328
! Me. Sep 2017 #330
Yes, this is a good use of EVERYONE"s time and effort! hatrack Sep 2017 #324
Because we need more than hardcore self-identified or registered Democrats to win...... vi5 Sep 2017 #327
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie is not even a Demo...»Reply #271