Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
It absolutely isn't the time to relitigate the primaries. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #1
The Dems lost because of voter suppression, which deprived us of millions of votes; pnwmom Sep 2017 #7
Sure. That accounts for some of it. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #20
Have you been reading about what the Russians were doing on Twitter and Facebook pnwmom Sep 2017 #31
Opposing side buys ads that target the other side! Film at 11 Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #130
The Russians aren't part of the "opposing side." At least they're not supposed to be. pnwmom Sep 2017 #138
Yeah, they are not supposed to be but they are. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #141
With the election as close as it was, the Russian micro-targeted Facebook ads, pnwmom Sep 2017 #146
Agree 100% Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #147
So you're saying that they are a big reason that the election was so close? ehrnst Sep 2017 #266
Nah that was baked in. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #269
What was "baked in?" (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #273
I see your google is broken. Maybe someone else can jump in. I gotta run. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #286
Scared to answer.... ehrnst Sep 2017 #291
well, brer cat Sep 2017 #172
Figuring out how Dems lost Wisconsin in 2010 delisen Sep 2017 #175
Why the election was so close has been discussed here. ehrnst Sep 2017 #261
So a record high unfavorable rating had nothing to do with it? Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #263
And still - she pulled in more votes than any POTUS candidate but BHO ehrnst Sep 2017 #264
Oh yeah, the big nothingburger. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #268
You mean like way back in 2012? ehrnst Sep 2017 #274
I don't need a calculator. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #276
I guess cognitive dissonance overrides math. ehrnst Sep 2017 #277
Yeah, math like in 1984 when the population was around 2/3rds the present population. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #282
Um... did I say 1984? ehrnst Sep 2017 #285
Positively Orwellian George II Sep 2017 #297
The population of the US in 1984 was about 20 million MORE than "2/3rds the present population" George II Sep 2017 #287
The population of the US was in 1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, etc. was "1//3rd or 1/2" the population... George II Sep 2017 #281
He was making a comparison that she won more votes than ANY presidential candidate. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #283
Oh, I'm caught up alright - but you misstated what SHE said. George II Sep 2017 #284
The desperation to "be the one who's right!!!" ehrnst Sep 2017 #289
Ironic, isn't it? George II Sep 2017 #290
Um - you need to go back and read the thread. ehrnst Sep 2017 #288
+1,000,000 George II Sep 2017 #298
Of course she got more votes "ever" because the U.S. population is the largest "ever" Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #304
Not a meaningless statistic at all - unless you are talking about how likeable HRC is. ehrnst Sep 2017 #317
First, people don't consider a candidate's unfavorable rating when voting, but if they did... George II Sep 2017 #275
Yep. Trump had a high unfavorable rating. Hassin Bin Sober Sep 2017 #278
So, if we use your rationale regarding unfavorable ratings, how did Clinton lose? George II Sep 2017 #279
Her favorability ratings were very high radical noodle Sep 2017 #295
Oh right... ehrnst Sep 2017 #280
+1 sheshe2 Sep 2017 #315
She DID crush him! She received more votes than any white candidate in history lunamagica Sep 2017 #98
And don't forget the 25 years the GOP luvtheGWN Sep 2017 #108
Admirable that Hillary unilaterally disclosed all that... but, was it smart politically? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #179
Are you saying this about her tax returns? ehrnst Sep 2017 #254
I don't really get what you are saying here. Do you mean that it is better to be shady and/or lunamagica Sep 2017 #294
Damn straight. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #265
+1 sheshe2 Sep 2017 #316
Exactly! Unfortunately, there will ALWAYS be third-party candidates running... InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #177
Not very successfully - well without help from Russia, anyway. ehrnst Sep 2017 #255
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #260
Hillary is a "ball buster?" What does that even mean? (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #262
I guess she threatened his masculinity. JHan Sep 2017 #293
totally agree...a perfect storm... samnsara Sep 2017 #87
Straw man again. Understanding what happened is vital to making sure ehrnst Sep 2017 #12
Where did I say anything about "being divisive"? Speaking of strawmen. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #16
Well, passive aggressive divisiveness is still divisiveness ehrnst Sep 2017 #79
+1,000 NastyRiffraff Sep 2017 #127
Whose relitigating primaries? Adrahil Sep 2017 #21
I'm responding to the OP Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #24
You keep saying that. So how are the primaries being re-litigated? I just don't see it. George II Sep 2017 #72
I keep saying it because it's true. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #78
The OP pointedly says that this is NOT the time to re-litigate the primaries, and he/she isn't. George II Sep 2017 #85
And I pointedly agreed with that in my subject line. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #94
The OP does rehash the primaries. DLevine Sep 2017 #95
True, but it's WAY past time to re-litigate what we STAND FOR as a party. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #182
That has already happened. George II Sep 2017 #184
Oh yeah, you're right, forgot about the Democratic leadership's promotion of their "Better Deal." InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #192
You mean like HRC did? Good luck. ehrnst Sep 2017 #292
It's re-litigation to keep arguing that Bernie shouldn't have been allowed in the primaries. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #107
WHERE? I can't locate where it says that. Is that actually a part of the OP? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #136
I didn't claim it was in the OP. I was talking about the general concept of re-litigation. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #164
Why bring it up? It's a straw man and distraction... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #166
What does this have to do with the OP? ehrnst Sep 2017 #173
Nothing. Nothing at all. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #189
I agree... we just need to make adjustments to guarantee the primary process is fair going forward. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #183
What adjustments do we need to make? (tn) ehrnst Sep 2017 #204
I'd like to get rid of caucuses. They restict voting to the privileged few. lapucelle Sep 2017 #270
I agree, and for the same reason. ehrnst Sep 2017 #271
Absolutely yes ... I've always hated that system... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #318
How about this...no non-Democrat can ever run in the Democratic Primary going forward. Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #322
Possibly sanders-progressives can also change delisen Sep 2017 #26
Sure Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #33
Change is the problem. kstewart33 Sep 2017 #48
I'm seeing different stats for the percentage of non-elderly Americans with employer-bases insurance femmedem Sep 2017 #97
Thanks for posting this. kstewart33 Sep 2017 #114
That number might be "90% of nonelderly/child with ins. get it through their employer" ehrnst Sep 2017 #186
I don't see anything even remotely re-litigating the primaries in the OP. Where is that? George II Sep 2017 #43
I was responding LITERALLY to the penultimate paragraph of the OP Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #50
Perhaps if people hadn't told them that both parties were the same Ninsianna Sep 2017 #248
Cuthbert, yes, the primaries ARE over, and it's 2018 time. Hortensis Sep 2017 #56
No one has ever pretended that. One of the major issues right now Ninsianna Sep 2017 #58
The first thing I said at my Democrats Central committee meeting Delmette2.0 Sep 2017 #100
The first think I think when I hear Bernie Sanders macandsandy Sep 2017 #106
Thank you Delmette2.0 Sep 2017 #112
And Hillary - with her decades of effective service and activism ehrnst Sep 2017 #237
Hmmm, New York. I wonder how much it's going to be, would love to see them. George II Sep 2017 #239
Awesome! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #240
In one day the Clinton Foundation does more for people in need than any Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #243
All the issues you mentioned are of vital importance. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #242
. George II Sep 2017 #246
When did HRC "oppose" a $15 minimum? ehrnst Sep 2017 #272
Current and ongoing issues are not re litigating the primaries. There are no Blank Checks. Lil Missy Sep 2017 #135
Just NO. nocoincidences Sep 2017 #2
re: the author of this 'article' ... rog Sep 2017 #3
And since he appears on Fox News his views are illegitimate? factfinder_77 Sep 2017 #14
Here's his bio ehrnst Sep 2017 #17
"Destroys Tucker Carlson", I like the way that sounds. George II Sep 2017 #241
Democrats regularly appear on Fox News, it's been happening since it's inception. George II Sep 2017 #46
How interesting, know who also regularly appears on Fox news? Ninsianna Sep 2017 #71
That's an irrefutable fact and undeniable bit of reality... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #76
Nina Turner appears on FoxNews.... (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #205
Bernie isn't "ripping our party apart." Get a grip. Vinca Sep 2017 #4
But he's not a democrat, dontcha know.... pangaia Sep 2017 #102
I was afraid someone wasn't going to bring that up ProfessorPlum Sep 2017 #191
Stop. LakeArenal Sep 2017 #5
He is only "tearing the Democratic party apart" in the wild imaginations of a bitter minority. phleshdef Sep 2017 #6
Hmmm Clinton is the hardest worker I know delisen Sep 2017 #27
I never said she wasn't and I like her. phleshdef Sep 2017 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author m-lekktor Sep 2017 #151
Actually, Bernie is doing more to bring the party together post-election than is Hillary. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #180
?????????????? heaven05 Sep 2017 #193
Can you give an example of how he is doing that?(nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #208
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #230
Her book tour is divisive? ehrnst Sep 2017 #236
Amazing accusations and insults. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #253
Actually, that's not true. Unless 'unity" now means be as divisive as possible by Ninsianna Sep 2017 #249
Define "normal Democrat" please. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #207
I'll give you a hint... its not DU web warriors like ourselves. phleshdef Sep 2017 #221
That's a hint, not an answer. ehrnst Sep 2017 #223
I could, but I usually refuse to answer questions that common sense can answer. phleshdef Sep 2017 #224
So you don't have an answer to back up your remark about "normal Democrats" ehrnst Sep 2017 #225
I do. And you know the answer. But you are being annoying on purpose. phleshdef Sep 2017 #226
I'm not the one saying things I can't back up. ehrnst Sep 2017 #227
Lol, you THINK you called me out. That's cute. phleshdef Sep 2017 #232
Can't walk away, can you? ehrnst Sep 2017 #233
I'm thin skinned? phleshdef Sep 2017 #234
Hey, you were the one who brought it up ehrnst Sep 2017 #235
No one "needs to put their money where their mouth is"... phleshdef Sep 2017 #238
Oh. Now we've resorted to going ad Hominem. ehrnst Sep 2017 #251
Your entire existence in this exchange is the epitome of ad hominem... phleshdef Sep 2017 #256
"I know you are but what am I?" ehrnst Sep 2017 #257
A legend in your own mind. phleshdef Sep 2017 #258
Well, I guess that settles it! ehrnst Sep 2017 #259
Beware: Thou Shalt Not Speak Ill of the Senator from Vermont MineralMan Sep 2017 #8
IF OP didnt know before, they do now. GONE Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #60
It appears that the poster used up his last hidden post. MineralMan Sep 2017 #61
I will take zero glee when I am proven to be correct about what I have said and predicted Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #65
So you actually believe that these 'Hillary BASHERS", on this site, cost her the election? Fix The Stupid Sep 2017 #185
no heaven05 Sep 2017 #195
And when will HRC supporters have to do this? zipplewrath Sep 2017 #9
HRC stated that she will not run again. So battling on her behalf is kind of a moot topic now. TheBlackAdder Sep 2017 #22
Guess we need to address Russia, Naziism delisen Sep 2017 #29
But just look at all the nice little clickies it gets.. pangaia Sep 2017 #105
Zip, you're making WAYYY too much sense... we either unite or die as a party. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #181
Hillary isn't running again. She does, however speak for ehrnst Sep 2017 #188
I don't think he has the power or influence to rip our party apart. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #10
+1000 ehrnst Sep 2017 #13
Sanders-don't see a revolutionary. I see a reformer delisen Sep 2017 #32
Sanders himself sees it differently. Weekend Warrior Sep 2017 #34
His group is called "Our Revolution", not "Our Reformation". George II Sep 2017 #49
Nailed it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #62
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #187
LOL, how do you say corporations in Latin? R B Garr Sep 2017 #196
Believe it or not, "corporations". They probably didn't exist when Latin was created.... George II Sep 2017 #197
I was actually thinking that, too! R B Garr Sep 2017 #198
"yelling at walls" Me. Sep 2017 #82
Good post...coming from a Sanders fan. Not that I agree with everything in it, but the notion JCanete Sep 2017 #122
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #11
It's posts like this that rip our party apart. panader0 Sep 2017 #15
Well, that's rich. Cuthbert Allgood Sep 2017 #23
another anti bernie post sigh dembotoz Sep 2017 #18
This is as annoying as the posters who post nothing but 'pro-Sanders' articles. SharonClark Sep 2017 #19
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #25
This OP does neither of those things. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #37
For your edification... tonedevil Sep 2017 #38
That's nice. Nobody is being "bashed" in the OP. Someone's behavior... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #45
Perhaps you should ask... tonedevil Sep 2017 #47
The OP stands, and there you have it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #53
The op is now ffr. Voltaire2 Sep 2017 #52
The OP stands, and there you have it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #54
The poster is gone, tonedevil Sep 2017 #57
Yes. It must have been something else. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #59
Whatever it takes. /nt tonedevil Sep 2017 #67
And this OP remains. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #70
EH, there is another new person on the same "mission" who will take up the slack!nt m-lekktor Sep 2017 #152
What mission? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #162
How do you relitigate that which has not been litigated? delisen Sep 2017 #42
That's an interesting question. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #110
NJ, I often disagree with your positions but I always admire your rhetorical skill ... philly_bob Sep 2017 #149
Thanks... NurseJackie Sep 2017 #160
That's a curious post. George II Sep 2017 #69
Oh for fuck's sake STAAAAAAAAAAHHHP. HughBeaumont Sep 2017 #30
Of course he bears responsibility, just as alll delisen Sep 2017 #40
I agree 100% ... It's all true! Thanks for sharing this! NurseJackie Sep 2017 #35
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #41
Well melman Sep 2017 #36
Well damn, MuseRider Sep 2017 #51
He disrupted poorly. LAGC Sep 2017 #66
No it didn't, it's still there. George II Sep 2017 #74
Some helpful links melman Sep 2017 #89
Why are you so happy? George II Sep 2017 #91
Happy? melman Sep 2017 #92
That is what I want to know. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #113
Is it really? melman Sep 2017 #118
I dont understand being gleeful when a loyal Democrat is silenced Eliot Rosewater Sep 2017 #120
That's one way to look at it melman Sep 2017 #134
Please exapand on that. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #140
What's the point? melman Sep 2017 #200
I guess argument by innuendo is a thing now. ehrnst Sep 2017 #209
Okay melman Sep 2017 #216
If there is more than one person looking at any situation there just might be Autumn Sep 2017 #199
Seriously melman Sep 2017 #201
That's a refreshing change, Autumn. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #210
A novel idea eh ehrnst. nt Autumn Sep 2017 #212
Well it's certainly preferable to panties getting in wads over fact checking. ehrnst Sep 2017 #215
Facts are facts and they often get checked. Autumn Sep 2017 #217
But beware the fact check on the wrong career politician... ehrnst Sep 2017 #218
I know what you mean, it happens you look back realize career politicians change. Autumn Sep 2017 #219
And there are those that claim that never changing one's mind over the course ehrnst Sep 2017 #220
Fact... sheshe2 Sep 2017 #228
Surely You Can Guess Me. Sep 2017 #144
Such a shame, and that's a fact. Autumn Sep 2017 #123
I am sad. m-lekktor Sep 2017 #153
Brave Me. Sep 2017 #39
K&R... revmclaren Sep 2017 #44
That's more than 3 paragraphs. nt. druidity33 Sep 2017 #55
I don't feel ripped apart. ananda Sep 2017 #63
Another repeat? guillaumeb Sep 2017 #64
Writer M.S. Hopkins is labeled as "Opinion Contributor" in his byline by The Hill, philly_bob Sep 2017 #68
Michele Alexander, "The New Jim Crow" Jopin Klobe Sep 2017 #73
Um, HRC was realistically the only candidate who was fighting for greater equality Ninsianna Sep 2017 #84
There's pragmatic, and then there's dismissive. Ken Burch Sep 2017 #109
Look forward, Ken. Look forward. Stop focusing on the past. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #117
I am looking forward. We can't MOVE forward as a party Ken Burch Sep 2017 #165
The primary is over. The voters decided. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #168
Bless you. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #203
I appreciate that. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #296
The block of voters that we need to take seriously in 2018 and 2020 sheshe2 Sep 2017 #132
Preach girl, preach! NurseJackie Sep 2017 #299
Hey! Thanks! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #300
She was being dismissed constantly for stating facts that even Bernie knew Ninsianna Sep 2017 #159
Thank you! NurseJackie Sep 2017 #229
Exactly, thank you! R B Garr Sep 2017 #267
She said precisely the opposite in her interview with Chris Hayes BainsBane Sep 2017 #143
"Attacks from Sanders and his supporters on Democrats aren't helping to rebuild the party, ... Lil Missy Sep 2017 #75
It hurts us and makes me wonder who these supporters are? Demsrule86 Sep 2017 #323
Your posts are far more divisive Fiendish Thingy Sep 2017 #77
+100. True. Duppers Sep 2017 #80
Because the article shared is not supportive of Bernie Sanders? ehrnst Sep 2017 #81
Really? How so? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #90
Agree. nt DLevine Sep 2017 #96
How so? sheshe2 Sep 2017 #142
Still waiting for clarification. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #211
We see Bernie very differently. That's a fact. Can we still UNITE? Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #83
i just wonder how the hell both parties are.... samnsara Sep 2017 #86
No Interloper Whatsoever! Me. Sep 2017 #145
The Hill loves to dig at Democrats & stir things up. You took the bait. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2017 #88
I stand with Bernie and the Democrats! tecelote Sep 2017 #93
This breaks the four paragraph rule. pangaia Sep 2017 #99
Oh dear! Now what? NurseJackie Sep 2017 #103
No emotion at all in my comment. Just a fact. pangaia Sep 2017 #119
Nobody is ridiculing you. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #124
If the Gif... tonedevil Sep 2017 #125
Oh well. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #131
The poster is no longer around to edit it. Autumn Sep 2017 #154
Oh. pangaia Sep 2017 #156
... Hell Hath No Fury Sep 2017 #101
Oh geeze! Here we go again. Stirring the pot. left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #104
It's actually to the point Plucketeer Sep 2017 #115
I'm sick of these daily attacks left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #116
Nobody is being attacked... only the behavior and actions criticized. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #128
Oh looky ! left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #148
You may ignore me ... but ignoring the truth won't change it. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #158
I think that many here confuse criticism of Sanders ehrnst Sep 2017 #213
... LiberalLovinLug Sep 2017 #111
I hate these sort of headlines Dem2 Sep 2017 #121
K&R Gothmog Sep 2017 #126
Talking about social equality WinstonSmith00 Sep 2017 #129
LOL-fresh off his appearance in the debate it's time to bash Bernie again. jalan48 Sep 2017 #133
Nobody is doing that. NurseJackie Sep 2017 #169
Starting to get old... time to move on ya think?!?! InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #231
He Isn't! annarbor Sep 2017 #137
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #139
I too am tired of these threads, but this one was better than most philly_bob Sep 2017 #150
Well I guess it might be true that one side has to blink. Exultant Democracy Sep 2017 #155
Bernie isn't ripping the party apart. He's helping the Democratic party aikoaiko Sep 2017 #157
We see Bernie very differently. That's a fact. Can we still UNITE? Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #174
Not with OPs like this. Someone the OP respects need to let them they are now the problem. aikoaiko Sep 2017 #222
Ahhhhhh, so no uniting? Hmmmmmm? Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #245
My point is the OP *is* not uniting. aikoaiko Sep 2017 #247
Woah! Again we DO see Bernie very differently. Like polar opposites. That's really a fact. Madam45for2923 Sep 2017 #250
But he doesn't have a "D" behind his name. romanic Sep 2017 #206
Because he is not a Democrat. democratisphere Sep 2017 #161
I Can Understand You Saying That Me. Sep 2017 #163
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2017 #167
Post removed Post removed Sep 2017 #170
K&R betsuni Sep 2017 #171
Because he wants to be President. PubliusEnigma Sep 2017 #176
Why are some people here ripping our party apart? InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2017 #178
this is the kind of post that might cause a lot of ignoring ProfessorPlum Sep 2017 #190
Attention? LexVegas Sep 2017 #194
How much is the DU anti-Bernie lotto up to now? If it's over $500 million bagelsforbreakfast Sep 2017 #202
It seems to explode when any criticism of the Senator is uttered. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2017 #214
This Thread Is Still Going? Me. Sep 2017 #244
Agreed ! left-of-center2012 Sep 2017 #301
:) sheshe2 Sep 2017 #303
Personally Me. Sep 2017 #305
I am cool with it. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #307
Bernie joined the Dems... Mike Nelson Sep 2017 #252
The Clinton's and Al Gore ran on progressive ideas way back a quarter of a century ago. R B Garr Sep 2017 #329
That's true, and... Mike Nelson Sep 2017 #331
Kick! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #302
I'll Join You Me. Sep 2017 #306
Thanks....Hey me...look what I found. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #308
Perfect Me. Sep 2017 #309
Thanks... sheshe2 Sep 2017 #310
Tomorrow.... Me. Sep 2017 #311
I guess that depends on our time zones. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #312
Well Then... Me. Sep 2017 #313
Me thinks a Will Pitt. sheshe2 Sep 2017 #314
Mornin' sheshe Me. Sep 2017 #319
Morning me! sheshe2 Sep 2017 #320
Well Lookee Here Me. Sep 2017 #321
Morning, me treestar Sep 2017 #325
That's A Good...Yes? Me. Sep 2017 #326
Yes. treestar Sep 2017 #328
! Me. Sep 2017 #330
Yes, this is a good use of EVERYONE"s time and effort! hatrack Sep 2017 #324
Because we need more than hardcore self-identified or registered Democrats to win...... vi5 Sep 2017 #327
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bernie is not even a Demo...»Reply #210