Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
12. We are not a midterm party
Mon Jun 26, 2017, 01:55 PM
Jun 2017

Single women and minorities aren't motivated. Consequently the electorate is less female, more white, more conservative, and older than in presidential years.

Obviously none of that works in our favor, and there are no indications anything will change. We can have successful midterms but only when independents slant sharply our way due to either satisfaction with a Democratic administration or -- far more likely -- severe dissatisfaction with a Republican administration.

The upside in a wave midterm is never anywhere close to what the GOP enjoys. During 2006 I remember thinking Republicans would net 80 or 90 seats in an environment like that. Bush had an approval rating in the 37 range in early November 2006 when Democrats picked up 31 seats. Contrast to early November 2010, when Obama had a low but not miserable approval rating of 45 but Democrats lost 63 seats.

Again, this all goes back to the devastating bottom line of 3 self-identified conservatives for every 2 self-identified liberals nationwide. A Rachel Maddow type is never going to spotlight that category but it's the reality and it dictates margin for error and therefore outcomes. We simply can't fight in as many places. If we make a push in unfriendly territory in a favorable environment it merely drops the margin to single digits. The opposition can shove unlikely race after race over the top when they own the situational edge.

I noticed our midterm lull as far back as 1978, when I was fresh in college. There was a jackass loudmouth conservative professor who used to hang out in the student newspaper office for a half hour or so every afternoon, for some reason. He was maybe 15 years older than I was but I could battle with him talking politics and he seemed to relish it. He was convinced Republicans would dominate the '78 midterm and that Reagan would win in 1980. I thought he was nuts about Reagan's chances but I sensed he was correct about the midterm. There didn't seem to be any energy at all among Democrats that year. Hey, we finally retook the presidency in 1976 so now we can take a nap.

When I joined this site prior to the 2002 midterm there was false sense of confidence. Everybody seemed to think the revenge motive for the 2000 Gore outcome would be plenty. That ignored 9-11 and all the indications from Pew and other polling firms that certain demographics had become scared and more security conscious.

My discouragement during midterms is that 2/3 of all governorships are decided in those years. Our bench suffers.





We needed Howard Dean back leftofcool Jun 2017 #1
I second this.. townie Jun 2017 #13
I'm sure he would of liked to have continued to be DNC Chair or appointed HHS Secretary liskddksil Jun 2017 #19
You are right leftof cool. His 50 state strategy worked, fight for every state, and recognize some still_one Jun 2017 #26
A lot of things zipplewrath Jun 2017 #2
There wouldn't have been any gerrymandering between 2008 and 2010. FBaggins Jun 2017 #5
1) Democrats get excited by presidential elections. Midterms are booooring. Or something... Hekate Jun 2017 #3
Good points. YoungDemCA Jun 2017 #4
Solid. nt. NCTraveler Jun 2017 #7
I've been one of the Democrats who hasn't always voted in midterms. Never again! Buckeye_Democrat Jun 2017 #10
Everyone I know votes in every election... Salviati Jun 2017 #27
We are not a midterm party Awsi Dooger Jun 2017 #12
I think many people won't self-identify as liberal because it's become a "bad word"... Buckeye_Democrat Jun 2017 #18
Newt Gingrich wrote the alt-vocabulary list & he was media-savvy. Look to Newt & the long game. nt Hekate Jun 2017 #20
+1 treestar Jun 2017 #14
Exactly my point. I get so disgusted with "our side" I could spit. Hekate Jun 2017 #21
Lazy Democrats thinking only Presidential Elections count! I've seen them, I've known them. And, RKP5637 Jun 2017 #6
The politics of healthcare, recovery and successful GOP messaging, and gerrymandering. SaschaHM Jun 2017 #8
Worked the phones in Wisconsin 2010. "Obamacare" and Greybnk48 Jun 2017 #9
The president's party generally loses in midterm elections mythology Jun 2017 #11
because the party leadership since 2008 has not cared about local/state offices and so msongs Jun 2017 #15
They voted for healthcare and to save the economy. They were voted out because of that emulatorloo Jun 2017 #16
A lot of infighting and lack of coordination between campaigns crazycatlady Jun 2017 #17
Ask Tim Kaine? moondust Jun 2017 #22
It was fucking RIGGED. THAT'S what happened. nt LaydeeBug Jun 2017 #23
they were blue dogs that lost and people bragged about not supporting them JI7 Jun 2017 #24
Gerrymandering and voter suppression. Starry Messenger Jun 2017 #25
"I'm going to keep telling people this until it finally fucking penetrates." LenaBaby61 Jun 2017 #29
Organizing for Action (America) damaged the DNC. To such a degree that karadax Jun 2017 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What the hell happened to...»Reply #12