Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Nevermypresident

(781 posts)
Fri May 19, 2017, 06:24 PM May 2017

Explain why Democrats in Congress keep saying it's "too soon" to be discussing impeachment?!!! [View all]

-Obstruction of Justice (evidence in public, FFS)

-Potential Abuse of Power ( traitor giving top secret intel to Russians in Oval Office - jeopardizing National Security and our ally(s)) Also, now public.

What's the strategy? IMO, at this point we look weak by not calling a spade a spade. Hell I'm aware the rethugs won't do it but the Dems in Congress need to not confuse the citizens by saying it's too soon. It gives the appearance that our traitor isn't guilty of impeachable offenses.

How long can this runaway train (leaks, thank God) keep going? Seriously, are we to wait another year(s) for Special Counsel to wrap this up in a bow? The impeachable evidence is public. Show Americans that the rethugs, once again, are aiding and abetting an enemy of the U.S. when they don't vote for impeachment in the House.

Mueller, FBI, and congressional committees can continue investigations into Russian cyberops, money/financial crimes, etc. Then they can actually indict traitor tiny hands once he's impeached as long as the statue of limitations hasn't expired.

If you feel as I do, call your Dems in Congress. I am.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Everyone of them could say exactly what you wanted BainsBane May 2017 #1
I know it would make zero difference. My point was our Dems saying it's too soon when the American Nevermypresident May 2017 #8
I don't think so BainsBane May 2017 #14
its obvious. drray23 May 2017 #2
Ironclad will be when they get Comey's memos, transcripts of Russian mtg. in Oval Office, etc. Nevermypresident May 2017 #12
Hmm... Mike Nelson May 2017 #3
Think back to Nixon /Agnew. Get rid of Pence and Ryan, then impeach. flor-de-jasmim May 2017 #4
They want gibraltar72 May 2017 #5
T's Crossed, I's Dotted, Charges Filed Me. May 2017 #6
my guess Skittles May 2017 #7
Listen to Adam Schiff. We have to be very careful about how this looks. GBizzle May 2017 #9
Impeachment is a political process gratuitous May 2017 #10
Because they're smart? frazzled May 2017 #11
You can call bernie sanders too.. he's Cha May 2017 #13
Thank You Me. May 2017 #22
A'ole pilikia, Me Cha May 2017 #23
It's strategy Lotusflower70 May 2017 #15
Simple sarisataka May 2017 #16
Answer-we don't want Trump to be acquitted brooklynite May 2017 #17
because we're investigating. We want to investigate, get the facts. Warren DeMontague May 2017 #18
Yes, your replies all sound reasonable and methodical. Yet, I hear our Dems saying they are Nevermypresident May 2017 #19
I think we should let this go a little longer. Every day WhiteTara May 2017 #20
Facts. Building a case of broken laws. Not politicizing it. countryjake May 2017 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Explain why Democrats in ...