Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,001 posts)
46. ALL men were once pre-natal. ALL sons, grandson, nephews, etc. ALL male employees & underlings.
Thu Mar 9, 2017, 09:23 PM
Mar 2017

Ask RepubliCON lawmakers if they want their pre-natal grandsons to have the best chance of succeeding in life, whether rich or not.

Remind them that each dollar spent on pre-natal care saves thousands spent on post-natal and developmental and dependent adult care.

If we say that 1 in 10 people is disabled (an under-estimate) and that of those disabilities pre-natal care could be mitigated or reduced or eliminated them to the point of saving 20% in post-natal, childhood, and adult care, then it becomes very compelling. That would be 1 in 50, and let`s say that the savings are $100,000 over a lifetime (an underestimate).

1 in 50 times $100 K works out to a savings of $2K for every birth. If you spend even only $200 in pre-natal care, that is a very cost-effective savings, and that is an underestimate.

Unfortunately, Republicons are all about quarterly corporate profit reports and don't think much about the long term.

Nearly 1 in 5 People Have a Disability in the U.S., Census Bureau ...
https://www.census.gov › Newsroom › Releases › Disability
Jul 25, 2012 - About 56.7 million people — 19 percent of the population — had a disability in 2010, according to a broad definition of disability, with more than ...


Disability Statistics: Facts on Disabilities and Disability Issues ...
https://www.disabled-world.com/disability/statistics/
Jan 26, 2017 - A study in the United Kingdom found that the poverty rate for disabled people was 23.1 percent compared to 17.9 percent for non-disabled people, but when extra expenses associated with being disabled were considered, the poverty rate for people with disabilities shot up to 47.4 percent.


Men do not contribute to producing a child? guillaumeb Mar 2017 #1
In that case, there is absolutely no reason a woman shouldn't be able to have an abortion on demand world wide wally Mar 2017 #13
But these same lawmakers would use the same argument. guillaumeb Mar 2017 #16
Hell, sheshe2 Mar 2017 #19
Let's hope not. n/t reflection Mar 2017 #22
Good point! sheshe2 Mar 2017 #24
Do any of them have daughters? Proud Liberal Dem Mar 2017 #27
They have children, but apparently an infinite capacity guillaumeb Mar 2017 #29
I was going to reply to this OP, but you already said it. panader0 Mar 2017 #45
Well, why should ANYBODY who hasn't or doesn't plan to give birth, assholes? 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 2017 #2
It's my right as a man to be covered for it, just in case... OnDoutside Mar 2017 #3
So many have no idea of 'the common good"--and that health babie grow into healthy riversedge Mar 2017 #4
I'd love to see someone like..... Maxine Waters, for example, Glamrock Mar 2017 #5
why do men have to pay for things like mammograms and pap smears? Are boner meds still covered? mulsh Mar 2017 #6
Yep. Single women have to pay for forgotmylogin Mar 2017 #43
Either women have the right to choose or they don't greymattermom Mar 2017 #7
How Anti-Abortion/"Pro Life" of them. If they're so dedicated to anti-abortion policies... haele Mar 2017 #8
Why should childless people pay taxes for schools... milestogo Mar 2017 #9
Aren't they glad their mommies had good prenatal care? Ilsa Mar 2017 #10
Seriously, like they all just showed up full grown one day? Cal Carpenter Mar 2017 #26
Hell, while youre at it, don't let toddlers be covered under their parents' health care. Squinch Mar 2017 #11
I thought men were supposed to be the "providers"- deserving higher pay than women wishstar Mar 2017 #12
Why should adults have to pay for childhood diseases like measles or chicken pox? world wide wally Mar 2017 #14
Simple crazycatlady Mar 2017 #15
Nah, castrate 'em just to be sure... hunter Mar 2017 #25
Don't forget the #1 health care expense associated with Men (my sex): Voting Republican. SaschaHM Mar 2017 #47
Why should non smokers have to pay for lung cancer care? HoneyBadger Mar 2017 #17
Jesus H Christ! JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #18
Why should women pay for the Viagra exam? Vinca Mar 2017 #20
Prostate cancer janterry Mar 2017 #32
Why should Democrats be subject to stupid Republican laws and programs? Mr. Ected Mar 2017 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author Pacifist Patriot Mar 2017 #23
+100 and AMEN. skylucy Mar 2017 #39
Hear hear. n/t reflection Mar 2017 #44
That is a perfectly reasonable question. DefenseLawyer Mar 2017 #28
Why should women pay for prostate exams Bettie Mar 2017 #30
we were thinking the same thing janterry Mar 2017 #34
Great Minds Bettie Mar 2017 #35
The very same bastards are going to say they should be able to fire pregnant women- - luvMIdog Mar 2017 #31
The line is intended to reach a group of low-info male voters struggle4progress Mar 2017 #33
They have no idea how insurance actually works. JenniferJuniper Mar 2017 #36
Idiots. Fucking hateful idiots. Solly Mack Mar 2017 #37
Because the baby they're carrying might be male... Nonhlanhla Mar 2017 #38
If you ever hear a man say he has never needed or used maternal health care, Mr.Bill Mar 2017 #40
+1 dhol82 Mar 2017 #41
Because we all have/had mothers (nt) progree Mar 2017 #42
ALL men were once pre-natal. ALL sons, grandson, nephews, etc. ALL male employees & underlings. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #46
Twitter folk have identified this tool as phylny Mar 2017 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why should men pay for pr...»Reply #46