Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ciaobaby

(1,000 posts)
22. Seriously.....
Fri Jan 13, 2017, 09:22 PM
Jan 2017

You Bernie haters are just unreal.
I suppose its OK with you that the dems who voted no on THE bill killed it. Cause all you can focus on is your hate of Bernie Sanders.
Pathetic.

I wish there was a great effort placed towards getting the pharmaceutical prices Thinkingabout Jan 2017 #1
Well that won't happen ciaobaby Jan 2017 #3
Guess you could say the same for allowing prescriptions from Canada, etc. Thinkingabout Jan 2017 #4
Unfortunately, we can't blame this all on Trump. ciaobaby Jan 2017 #5
Not any more than getting down the cost in the US allowing us to go to Thinkingabout Jan 2017 #6
The bill was meant to import drugs from Canada at the lower cost. ciaobaby Jan 2017 #7
Reason #454 Ccarmona Jan 2017 #27
No more corporate $ HoneyBadger Jan 2017 #31
I agree with the disgust for these Democrats expressed in the OP, the statement regarding how still_one Jan 2017 #2
Medicare will be effected. Doreen Jan 2017 #8
No, Medicare will not disappear if the ACA goes away. Expanded MEDICAID however, will be still_one Jan 2017 #19
Before ACA Medicare would not allow me to have knee replacements or yearly female visits. As ACA Doreen Jan 2017 #20
There is no doubt what there intentions ar Doreen. As far as I am aware they cannot get rid of still_one Jan 2017 #24
It's not the fucking Sanders bill. It is Amy Klobuchar's amendment. She was the seaglass Jan 2017 #9
You beat me to it. RedWedge Jan 2017 #11
Joint bill by Sanders and Klobuchar ciaobaby Jan 2017 #14
Joint bill by Sanders and Klobuchar ciaobaby Jan 2017 #13
Sponsor, co-sponsor seaglass Jan 2017 #16
Thank you for that, seaglass! No way should Senator Amy Klobuchar's Cha Jan 2017 #47
Joint bill by Sanders and Klobuchar ciaobaby Jan 2017 #15
Facts matter to some people. n/t seaglass Jan 2017 #17
Alrighty then ciaobaby Jan 2017 #18
Yes, FACTS do matter, seaglass.. thank you! Amy Klobuchar should not Cha Jan 2017 #44
Thank you, seaglass! Amy Klobuchar's Amendment. Why is Amy's name Cha Jan 2017 #40
This wasn't Sanders' amendment. It was Klobuchar's. RedWedge Jan 2017 #10
Jointly purposed by Sanders and Klobuchar. ciaobaby Jan 2017 #12
Klobuchar is the sponsor. baldguy Jan 2017 #21
Seriously..... ciaobaby Jan 2017 #22
I don't hate Sanders. I just don't think he should claim credit for somthing he didn't start. baldguy Jan 2017 #23
Maybe you should see how Klobuchar feels about his co-sponsorship. ciaobaby Jan 2017 #25
Yes, but a co-sponsor of a bill or amendment is not the sponsor. The title of your OP is a lie. baldguy Jan 2017 #28
Again, do you feel as strongly about the dems that killed the bill. ciaobaby Jan 2017 #32
Put the capital back in "Dems". It's a proper noun. baldguy Jan 2017 #34
Yeah, why is Amy's name being left off when she is the actual Cha Jan 2017 #42
Because it's a way to undemine Democrats' influance. baldguy Jan 2017 #45
Sure you do. truebluegreen Jan 2017 #26
Some of that "dictatorial, authoritarian" from the Dem leadership that Sanders campaigned against baldguy Jan 2017 #29
Depends, doesn't it? truebluegreen Jan 2017 #35
Do you believe that a united Democratic caucus would have voted against it with the Republicans? baldguy Jan 2017 #36
What are you talking about? truebluegreen Jan 2017 #37
Have you read any of this thread at all? baldguy Jan 2017 #38
Are you just trying to deflect? I was talking to you. truebluegreen Jan 2017 #39
It's not my job to read posts for you & explain them to you. baldguy Jan 2017 #41
Still ducking I see (don't you just hate it truebluegreen Jan 2017 #43
So, Democrats & the Democratic Party are "indefensible", now? baldguy Jan 2017 #46
Bingo. Hope the hyper-alerter's don't get you. Trust Buster Jan 2017 #30
The alerter's haven't gotten me yet. That was yesterday. ciaobaby Jan 2017 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Great Article re Sanders ...»Reply #22