Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,641 posts)
4. My preference would be to filibuster for four years if necessary.
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 01:20 PM
Nov 2016

After all, Trump lost the popular vote by 2 million so he has no claim to any mandate.

If he did it would only last 1 year correct? SHRED Nov 2016 #1
I don't know. got a source? yurbud Nov 2016 #2
but it would help for a year Horse with no Name Nov 2016 #21
Yes. Drunken Irishman Nov 2016 #26
I picked "other" because I don't believe he can seat him n/t SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #3
My preference would be to filibuster for four years if necessary. guillaumeb Nov 2016 #4
The other side of that coin is that a lot of law can be decided in our favor over the next 2 years. Lil Missy Nov 2016 #9
great point yurbud Nov 2016 #10
Much depends on who the Trump nominee will be. guillaumeb Nov 2016 #14
You are assuming the filibuster will still exist. I am waiting to see what will happen with that. stevenleser Nov 2016 #22
Mitch McConnell did warn Harry Reid about partially eliminating the filibuster. guillaumeb Nov 2016 #28
I think we can forget about using the filibuster. world wide wally Nov 2016 #5
With the advice and consent of the Senate. longship Nov 2016 #6
The appointment would be for about 11 months: femmocrat Nov 2016 #7
The 115th Congress will end in 2019 SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #8
A "session" is not a term. FBaggins Nov 2016 #19
I doubt the Republicans will chance a complete recess for just that reason. WillowTree Nov 2016 #16
In all likelihood... not even that long FBaggins Nov 2016 #17
Fuck it,withdraw his name and seat Hillary or Bernie! libtodeath Nov 2016 #11
Just do it President Obama, there is nothing to lose to TRY. Sunlei Nov 2016 #12
Perhaps Obama can test the "pro forma" pretense of the Senate... Silent3 Nov 2016 #13
He already tested it SickOfTheOnePct Nov 2016 #18
what you said yurbud Nov 2016 #20
NLRB - lost big time. SC said it was unconstitutional. Yo_Mama Nov 2016 #30
Other - he probably doesn't have a choice. FBaggins Nov 2016 #15
Can he really do it? BainsBane Nov 2016 #23
Obama does not have the option to "seat" Garland without Senate confirmation. tritsofme Nov 2016 #24
What happens if you don't file court papers on time? yurbud Nov 2016 #25
there is no time period laid out in the Constitution for Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #27
The president is not a dictator, as we would take well to remember. tritsofme Nov 2016 #31
the media and very wealthy, allow presidents to flout the Constitution when it suits them yurbud Nov 2016 #32
It would be a stupid, stupid move. Obama isn't stupid. Yo_Mama Nov 2016 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should Obama seat Merrick...»Reply #4