General Discussion

Socal31

(2,484 posts)

24. Brown will veto.

Reply to KamaAina (Original post)

Sun Jun 26, 2016, 12:05 AM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

99 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Background Checks For Ammo? Could Become Law in California [View all] KamaAina Jun 2016 OP

K&R! DemonGoddess Jun 2016 #1

Are they funding the purchase of the "magazine clips"? pipoman Jun 2016 #2

Why not? I have no problem using surveillance on people into lethal weapons. Hoyt Jun 2016 #3

Well I know you don"t pipoman Jun 2016 #4

When it's directed at gun abusers -- you are correct. Hoyt Jun 2016 #7

You support illegal surveillance of gun owners? Marengo Jun 2016 #14

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #19

Most gun OWNERS are callous and racist? Just so we are clear, I asked if you supported ILLEGAL Marengo Jun 2016 #23

Do the ones who aren't racist get to sue the government? Straw Man Jun 2016 #26

At least you are honest about your hypocrisy... TipTok Jun 2016 #33

Nice. Set that precident and the next fascist will go after racial groups, or the handicapped jack_krass Jun 2016 #77

Nope. Owners are given the choice of moving them out of state or turning them. Just reading posts Jun 2016 #8

That part is probably a legal kiss of death. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #17

Except when it comes to seizure Aerows Jun 2016 #36

You're referring to civil asset forfeiture. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #40

And if someone can't prove the bullets were obtained illegally... scscholar Jun 2016 #52

I'm far more pissed about the cash Aerows Jun 2016 #58

Do you support civil asset forfeiture? NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #62

When the asset can be used to kill... scscholar Jun 2016 #66

That's all I need to know about you. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #72

They can be allowed their guns, they just can't buy avebury Jun 2016 #46

It's the requirement to turn in magazines over 10 rounds. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #57

You can't buy a damn thing Aerows Jun 2016 #59

You're not alone in anger over civil assert forfeiture. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #63

It is by all rights and reason Aerows Jun 2016 #73

Most excellent! Initech Jun 2016 #5

Regulation of ammunition is entirely constitutional. roamer65 Jun 2016 #6

No complaint. Straw Man Jun 2016 #27

I have no problem with it. roamer65 Jun 2016 #49

So tell me,. how many times have you had a Federal background check to buy s six pack? oneshooter Jun 2016 #53

Times were that you couldn't buy a beer in the United States. Period. roamer65 Jun 2016 #64

If you are refering to prohibition , beer wasn't outlawed, only hard liquor. oneshooter Jun 2016 #67

The sale, manufacture and transportation of beer was illegal under the Volstead Act. roamer65 Jun 2016 #69

They will if they are federal. roamer65 Jun 2016 #71

I'd enter this dust up Aerows Jun 2016 #75

Dry counties still exist, too Aerows Jun 2016 #74

Damn straight. roamer65 Jun 2016 #90

I do. The devil is in the details. Straw Man Jun 2016 #97

ammunition falls under the 2nd amendment melm00se Jun 2016 #61

The banning of it, yes. The regulation of it, no. roamer65 Jun 2016 #68

So it starts, Hawaii... sheshe2 Jun 2016 #9

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #34

Sorry ... Straw Man Jun 2016 #37

So did mine. nt Mojorabbit Jun 2016 #39

+1 jack_krass Jun 2016 #81

Mine too Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #83

My irony meter goes to "11"... appal_jack Jun 2016 #91

Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #82

How long was Bernie there? sheshe2 Jun 2016 #88

Longer than some, not as long as others Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #89

So sorry I misunderstood. sheshe2 Jun 2016 #94

Wow! A proposal that actually addresses a real problem! Recursion Jun 2016 #10

It's easier to buy bullets than Sudafed Nevernose Jun 2016 #11

Extra minute? Straw Man Jun 2016 #28

Can someone PLEASE make a video of an AR-15 knockoff spraying Sudafed around a room? KamaAina Jun 2016 #41

Depending on the wording, the entire thing may be unconstitutional. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #12

I agree, even Connecticut grandfathered in the existing property. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #16

Hopefully the voters will tell them to stuff it. ileus Jun 2016 #13

Chris Rock said in his stand up Chevy Jun 2016 #15

Which is just as illegal... TipTok Jun 2016 #35

K&R nt ProudProgressiveNow Jun 2016 #18

K & R SunSeeker Jun 2016 #20

Absolutely great! Hats off to them! Wonderful! Akamai Jun 2016 #21

I've been saying this for years. You can have your murder enablers, so long as the ammo is Feeling the Bern Jun 2016 #22

Brown will veto. Socal31 Jun 2016 #24

Nope. It's a ballot referendum. KamaAina Jun 2016 #42

Another reason not to stay home Politicalboi Jun 2016 #25

I expect we'll be seeing a lot of Californa plates at BassPro here (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #29

I can already see the AZ and NV stores writing up their orders. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #43

Arizona and Nevada thank CA for your contributions to their sales tax revenues nt Ex Lurker Jun 2016 #30

Yep HDSam Jun 2016 #38

What does it say sarisataka Jun 2016 #31

Not to mention DustyJoe Jun 2016 #32

Probably true GummyBearz Jun 2016 #55

Straw purchasers...it's not like a guy, who illegally owns a gun, is going to Press Virginia Jun 2016 #80

Its difficult to see how this might prevent a single death. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #44

but it will make people feel good about themselves Press Virginia Jun 2016 #76

Could be an interesting way around the 2nd Amendment. avebury Jun 2016 #45

Specious argument LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #47

But they are not banning the purchse of ammunition. avebury Jun 2016 #48

I wasn't commenting on the propsed Califonrnia legislation, LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #51

a guy illegally possessing a gun will just use a straw purchaser Press Virginia Jun 2016 #78

A tax on ink was ruled unconstitutional Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #92

Of course you can't ban it. roamer65 Jun 2016 #50

Great! Kick! Squinch Jun 2016 #54

It doesn't go far enough Travis_0004 Jun 2016 #56

Make it a felony to import unlicensed ammunition into the state mwrguy Jun 2016 #60

Not on the first offense. roamer65 Jun 2016 #65

OK mwrguy Jun 2016 #79

But...but...but...Freedumb!!@22 jpak Jun 2016 #70

I'd go further, CA. roamer65 Jun 2016 #84

I have several firearms that are in calibers no longer produced. oneshooter Jun 2016 #99

Good, that will stop all firearms deaths Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #85

So a background check system that madville Jun 2016 #86

They'll just get a friend or relative to buy it for them Press Virginia Jun 2016 #87

Of course the law doesn't allow NICS to be used for ammunition Lee-Lee Jun 2016 #93

They should handle it like the CPL permitting process. roamer65 Jun 2016 #95

That woukd cost a whole lot of money to say the least Lee-Lee Jun 2016 #98

What about people who create their own rounds from spent casings? jack_krass Jun 2016 #96