Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The 1950's were not all that great and they are not coming back [View all]jg10003
(976 posts)39. Unions made the difference in the 50's
OP is right that the manufacturing jobs are not coming back. Walmart has replaced GM and U.S Steel as the major employers. But the difference is not the type of business of the employer, but rather how profitable the employer is. GM in the 1950's was very profitable, as is Walmart today. But GM paid its' employees enough to support a middle class lifestyle. Walmart employees are not paid enough to feed their families without food stamps. GM employees had a union, Walmart employees do not. The important factor is the relationship between employer and employee. It doesn't matter if the employee is building cars or stacking shelves.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
107 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think large investments in transportation, energy and communications infrastructure
tk2kewl
Jun 2016
#81
Not to mention 1950's diseases like polio, measles, etc. Childhood leukemia was a death sentence.
SharonAnn
Jun 2016
#95
It's not The Bomb and White Citizens Councils that people miss. It's stable jobs with pensions
leveymg
Jun 2016
#8
Did you read his post? We recognize that the jobs are gone. That doesn't mean we can't
rhett o rick
Jun 2016
#14
Again what the hell are you talking about and to whom? this addressed to the Trumps
Peacetrain
Jun 2016
#18
Yes. But, the "'50s type job" (full benefits) and a generous social net is still worth fighting for
leveymg
Jun 2016
#16
How so? Scotland and the Northern Ireland stand to gain by keeping EU membership, even if they have
leveymg
Jun 2016
#20
Did you even reread your own post?..Scotland and Northern Ireland are just as impacted by income
pkdu
Jun 2016
#22
The regions of the English Midlands and South are the one that lost industry and jobs.
leveymg
Jun 2016
#60
The '50s were great if you were white and male. POCs and women need not apply back then though.
brush
Jun 2016
#33
Did your grandmothers not want their own careers? How about you? You want to be a housewife?
brush
Jun 2016
#46
Did you ever ask them if they wanted a careeer, instead of assuming, as men often do, . . .
brush
Jun 2016
#64
Cher couldn't do it, and neither can you or anyone else. Nostalgia ain't what it used to be...
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#70
It took a world war and tens of millions of deaths to make it possible for us
AZ Progressive
Jun 2016
#58
40% of the workforce, in the private sector, was unionized. One unionized job could support a family
demosincebirth
Jun 2016
#59
Change may not be intrinsically "good" (a value judgment), but it IS inevitable and inexorable.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#71
It is neither good nor bad, it just IS, as the ruling principle of the universe.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#78
Yes, I suppose it's far easier to just wash our hands of the whole upcoming mess . . .
HughBeaumont
Jun 2016
#83
And, THIS IS REALITY. Too many people refuse to look it in the face and deal with it.
Surya Gayatri
Jun 2016
#66