General Discussion

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)

12. No solution is going to be 100%

Fri Jun 17, 2016, 05:41 PM

Jun 2016

But some regulations with tough penalties might ensure some better compliance. It seems like every week (for just one example), there are half a dozen or more guys caught at airport screenings with guns in their baggage that they "forgot." If the penalty for forgetting where your guns are was, say, forfeiture of all weapons, prohibition from buying or possessing firearms for a specified period, and a hefty fine, I'll bet we'd see far fewer "forgotten" weapons turning up on x-ray scanners.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, my 86-year-old Mom phoned today about gun violence. [View all] TygrBright Jun 2016 OP

That seems like a reasonable regulation that wouldn't infringe on anyone's rights gratuitous Jun 2016 #1

The only problem I see is that the 9/11 terrorists took the time to learn to fly planes passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #9

No solution is going to be 100% gratuitous Jun 2016 #12

I agree that every step helps passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #14

The comparison between guns and cars is completely insane. Initech Jun 2016 #2

Yes. Cars are actually useful for something. Crunchy Frog Jun 2016 #6

Exactly! passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #15

I like your mom. alot irisblue Jun 2016 #3

Sure will. She's pretty great. Thanks! n/t TygrBright Jun 2016 #4

You have a nicer mom than I do. hunter Jun 2016 #5

The U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights don't guarantee any right to keep and bear cars. AlbertCat Jun 2016 #7

2Amend. makes our Constitituion a suicide pact ErikJ Jun 2016 #8

Registration of firearms would not violate Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #10

Perhaps not TeddyR Jun 2016 #18

The same way we do everything..... Laws. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #21

And if I don't? TeddyR Jun 2016 #22

You pay the price if you fail to obey. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #23

Ok TeddyR Jun 2016 #24

maybe not stopping a shooting just tracking the evil into a history irisblue Jun 2016 #26

It leaves a trail. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #27

"It's really not hard, except for the intentionally obtuse." Surya Gayatri Jun 2016 #29

"Sell a weapon in an improper way and someone uses that weapon to kill then the original owner has Lonusca Jun 2016 #31

Registration would make those laws much more effective. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #32

How would registration do that? Lonusca Jun 2016 #37

Adam Laza's guns were registered. nt hack89 Jun 2016 #34

Keeping and bearing is not necessarily owning bigmonkey Jun 2016 #11

Keep means owning and storing with your other belongings. NT. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #30

So if I bring a book home from the library I own it? Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #33

Only if you choose to illegally keep it. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #35

non sequitur NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #38

So if you are part of a well regulated militia Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #39

No. NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #40

So keep does not mean owning then. Cassiopeia Jun 2016 #41

Again, non sequitur. nt NutmegYankee Jun 2016 #42

So if the terrorists had to buy insurance TeddyR Jun 2016 #13

guns that kill people are not all in the hands of terrorists passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #16

In other words TeddyR Jun 2016 #17

As I've already mentioned. passiveporcupine Jun 2016 #20

Fine TeddyR Jun 2016 #25

If the insurance is very expensive, and it should be, then yes! (ntxt) scscholar Jun 2016 #28

The insurance is very cheap. ManiacJoe Jun 2016 #36

LOL. aikoaiko Jun 2016 #19