Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WillowTree

(5,325 posts)
31. I don't use euphemisms to refer to people.
Fri May 20, 2016, 11:20 AM
May 2016

Last edited Fri May 20, 2016, 01:29 PM - Edit history (1)

But I do think that a percentage of the populace that may even be approaching a majority has become too........you'll excuse the expression.......thin skinned about just about everything. People are looking for reasons to be offended/insulted/outraged anymore.

How often right here on DU do we see thread headings asking "Should I be offended by _____?"? Hint: If you have to ask, the answer is "NO".

Just yesterday there was the ridiculous story about how African Americans feel intimidated when they go to national parks. "Why?" you ask. Because there are usually many trees there. And what's the problem with trees? They remind them of lynchings. Really. People have to be actively, stubbornly looking for something to be miserable about for their minds to go anywhere near such a conclusion. I'd be surprised if one half of one percent of all people of color in this country have the time or inclination to look that hard to find a reason to be offended by TREES. But there it is, put out there as fact by a few malcontents who apparently ran out of anything legitimate to gripe about.

Truth is, there is no moral or constitutional right bestowed upon anyone to never be offended by anything. If I went around getting all offended by everything that I see or hear that I find offensive, I'd be pretty unhappy most of the time and I just don't choose to live that way. And I have no sympathy whatsoever for those who do.

There are words that can only be used to be demeaning and offensive. Most of us know what those are. But.......and I'm saying this as nothing more than my own personal opinion.......sports teams like to choose names to portray themselves as tough and fierce and intrepid to their opponents. (Which doesn't explain the Miami Dolphins, of course. And what the heck is up with Browns?? Ah, but I digress.) I don't see those as demeaning qualities. I don't think that names like Rams or Bears or Jaguars or Falcons were chosen to demean rams or bears or jaguars or falcons. Same goes for cowboys, buccaneers or 49ers. And I don't see the term "Redskins", when used in this context, to be demeaning toward Native Americans.

And apparently neither do a lot of Native Americans.

YMMV.

I'm not surprised. n/t jaysunb May 2016 #1
Not surprised. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #2
This White Guy Has To Say He Has No Opinion Vogon_Glory May 2016 #3
Oh, my. pintobean May 2016 #4
Not surpising at all, but it doesn't matter. Captain Stern May 2016 #5
Apparently it's only bleeding-heart liberal, pasty white, activist busybodies who are... ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #14
I straddle the fence on this one. leftofcool May 2016 #27
Priorities indeed, leftofcool. nt ChisolmTrailDem May 2016 #28
And absolutely no one who knew Native Americans personally is surprised. Shandris May 2016 #6
No shit. linuxman May 2016 #7
The political correctness trolls won't like this davidn3600 May 2016 #8
Canine of the stream pintobean May 2016 #9
So if someone doesn't care for the term, Mendocino May 2016 #13
isn't it great how that works? eShirl May 2016 #29
Bullshit Puha Ekapi May 2016 #10
I'm sticking with your answer. Dont call me Shirley May 2016 #49
K&R!!! 2naSalit May 2016 #51
Don't you like how WAPO said they took a poll so then " most " don't mind ...what BUllshit Person 2713 May 2016 #52
Exactly how did WAPO Mendocino May 2016 #11
According to their method Mike__M May 2016 #17
WAPO was at a time, respected. Mendocino May 2016 #24
Why use a name that 9% of Native Americans find offensive, Nye Bevan May 2016 #12
Because no matter what they call themselves....... WillowTree May 2016 #16
The term "Redskin" isn't "really blatant and demeaning"? Act_of_Reparation May 2016 #30
I don't use euphemisms to refer to people. WillowTree May 2016 #31
I don't buy that canard. Act_of_Reparation May 2016 #35
Is no one else is allowed to have a different opinion.......?" WillowTree May 2016 #36
I vote for the Potatoes. KamaAina May 2016 #37
Why not just call them the Ore-Ida's and put that logo on their helmet!! madinmaryland May 2016 #40
You must be thinking of the NBA. KamaAina May 2016 #42
I see you are now .... madinmaryland May 2016 #43
I call them the Washington Redscabs, peel them back and watch them bleed! snooper2 May 2016 #33
Heh! As another Cowboy's fan, I call them the Deadskins!! madinmaryland May 2016 #41
If only one tribe finds it offensive ... surrealAmerican May 2016 #15
As one commentator put it Mike__M May 2016 #20
thank god! Fact is that this kind of issue feeds Trumpism ericson00 May 2016 #18
Being "okay" with it doesn't make the name not racist. n/t BlueStater May 2016 #19
Words are not racist, human intent is Albertoo May 2016 #21
That's the strangest thing I've heard all week. kwassa May 2016 #22
Well, i can give you one example, the N word Albertoo May 2016 #23
History is history, odd or not. kwassa May 2016 #25
A whole different, much more complex, discussion Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #48
A rational mind can rather easily spend time on both. LanternWaste May 2016 #26
All I was trying to say was Albertoo May 2016 #44
Native American Friends Bayard May 2016 #32
Nice. That must mean most Irish-Americans are OK with being called 'Micks'. tenderfoot May 2016 #34
Doesn't bother this one. Throd May 2016 #38
Most are OK with it. Giggity May 2016 #39
Most of my Irish friends calls themselves Micks bigwillq May 2016 #45
They are fine with "The Fighting Irish" Algernon Moncrieff May 2016 #47
Well. Tell these guys. ismnotwasm May 2016 #46
"I’m dropping my protest of Washington’s football team name" branford May 2016 #50
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll finds large majority...»Reply #31