HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Watching the television s... » Reply #23

Response to longship (Reply #17)

Sun May 1, 2016, 10:04 AM

23. Apparently his book isn't indisputable...

 

He asserts proof of a core hit because FBI analysis revealed "traces of [sic per reviewer] lead with a trace of antimony" (p. 325) in the damage. What he omits destroys his theory. He does not explain that a bullet core has several other metallic elements in its composition, not two, rendering his conclusion false. He further neglects to inform the reader that by May 1964 the damage had been covertly patched with a concrete paste and that in August, not July, 1964, the FBI tested the scrapings of the paste, not the damage, which gave the two metal results.

He says the second shot transited JFK's neck and caused the nonfatal wounds striking Connally at Zapruder film frame 224 where Connally is seen turned to his right, allegedly lining his body up with JFK's neck, thus sustaining the single bullet explanation. He finds proof that a bullet hit then in Connally's lapel that was flapping in that one frame as it passed through. But he does not conform to fact. Wind gusting to twenty miles per hour that day ruffled clothing. And, there is no bullet hole in the lapel but in the jacket body beneath the right nipple area.

Posner crowns his theory with the certainty of science by using one side of the computer-enhanced studies by Failure Analysis Associates of Menlo Park that his text implies he commissioned. The firm, however, lambastes his use as a distortion of the technology that it had developed for the American Bar Association's mock trial of Oswald where both sides used it.

http://www.assassinationscience.com/wrone.html

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 36 replies Author Time Post
RandySF May 2016 OP
jmowreader May 2016 #1
longship May 2016 #2
RandySF May 2016 #4
longship May 2016 #6
Chasstev365 May 2016 #8
Human101948 May 2016 #7
longship May 2016 #10
Human101948 May 2016 #14
longship May 2016 #17
LineLineLineLineLineLineReply Apparently his book isn't indisputable...
Human101948 May 2016 #23
longship May 2016 #25
1939 May 2016 #3
Marengo May 2016 #19
Wilms May 2016 #5
yourpaljoey May 2016 #28
roamer65 May 2016 #35
gordianot May 2016 #9
gregcrawford May 2016 #11
Warren DeMontague May 2016 #12
rgbecker May 2016 #13
30Draw May 2016 #15
KG May 2016 #16
yourpaljoey May 2016 #29
Orrex May 2016 #18
Zen Democrat May 2016 #20
ileus May 2016 #21
One of the 99 May 2016 #22
stopbush May 2016 #31
WinkyDink May 2016 #24
rjsquirrel May 2016 #26
stopbush May 2016 #27
Todays_Illusion May 2016 #32
stopbush May 2016 #33
NutmegYankee May 2016 #30
mrmpa May 2016 #34
tammywammy May 2016 #36
Please login to view edit histories.