Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PufPuf23

(8,910 posts)
15. The federal government has been entering "stewardship contracts" to restore
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:19 PM
Jan 2016

wildlands surrounding Burns, OR (by forest thinning and prescribed fire) and providing jobs to local businesses since the mid-1990s.

I have been personally out of the loop for over 20 years (my work there was 1991-1993) but less than a 90 second internet search indicates the program continues on local lands managed by the US Forest Service and various Department of Interior agencies (Park Service, Fish and WL Service, Bureau of Land Management).

The program began in response to the decline in the timber industry to introduce more ecological management (fire and thinning mostly) mandated to be performed by local labor and businesses where immediate $ return to Treasury was secondary.

I don't know the current size of the program but would wager that it could still be expanded substantially.. The odd thing about programs like this as folks on both the "wise use" and "environmentalist" sides often do not make the decision to support or work in good faith with the federal managers. Back in 1991 the two sawmills had closed in Burns and there was a recent very large forest fire nearby. I worked for a management consulting firm in Portland that was hired by a group from the Burns business community to work with the US Forest Service for strategies to replace the jobs losses, give locals more stake in the nearby forests, and improve wildland management. We had recently worked in northeastern California on a similar regional program. Now such programs are quite common and standard (and could still stand a major expansion in most cases).

The rw militias are of the "wise use" type and are whiny babies. The stewardship program around Burns is heavy to introducing fire at pre-historic levels to improve wildlife habitat and reduce susceptibility to wildfire. They could support the Feds who are trying to funnel monies into the community and involve locals directly in land management. But then we know these asshats are not acting in good faith, want something given to them, and will resist the Feds by definition.

Public announcement (2012) of two recent BLM stewardship contracts out of Burns:

http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/burns/files/BU-StewardshipAwarding2012.pdf

Presentation on the stewardship contract program on the Malheur National Forest at a 2014 conference:

http://www.sustainablenorthwest.org/uploads/general/Steve_Beverlin_PPT.pdf

Apparently, the jury did not buy their defense jberryhill Jan 2016 #1
Unfortunately, news accounts are not .... reACTIONary Jan 2016 #3
Oregon has air quality laws and a low tolerance 4 idiots who abuse land roguevalley Jan 2016 #42
Thank you for posting this. tazkcmo Jan 2016 #2
This is the background ... sunnystarr Jan 2016 #8
$600,000 of taxpayer's money handmade34 Jan 2016 #4
I've read they did it to cover illegal poaching on federal grounds cali Jan 2016 #5
They intentionally set fire to federal property. cleanhippie Jan 2016 #6
K&R eom MohRokTah Jan 2016 #7
It is the same thing I would be guilty of if I was burning my grass and it LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #9
Actually, they set the fires intentionally to cover up poaching on public land. OregonBlue Jan 2016 #11
It doesn't make that much different the act that they did to cover it up was arson on LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #12
Here's some history on the Hammonds... 2naSalit Jan 2016 #10
Uhhmm, did you read your own title? How about- arson? LooseWilly Jan 2016 #13
The point of my post us that.... reACTIONary Jan 2016 #22
Read more, get back to us. nt Logical Jan 2016 #14
The federal government has been entering "stewardship contracts" to restore PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #15
interesting hfojvt Jan 2016 #17
The "whiny babies" are obviously making excuses. PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #20
middle of nowhere? hfojvt Jan 2016 #25
I actually live where there are less people and services local PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #27
I was way off on the size hfojvt Jan 2016 #29
You are correct now. South Dakota is sparsely populated and so is eastern Oregon (and Montana). PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #31
A major claim of the militia is they believe they have a constitutional right to the land. PufPuf23 Jan 2016 #30
Thanks for the background information eom reACTIONary Jan 2016 #23
if you can start a 139 acre fire hfojvt Jan 2016 #16
You haven't spent much time in the west, have you? XemaSab Jan 2016 #18
Driving across the Colorado Rockies a few years back EL34x4 Jan 2016 #19
to some people hfojvt Jan 2016 #26
Nice try. Ohio is mid EAST. It is 2/3 of the way from the center of the country Ms. Toad Jan 2016 #43
I think it is insane too hfojvt Jan 2016 #44
Arson. (n/t) Iggo Jan 2016 #21
K and R. nt Quixote1818 Jan 2016 #24
Origionally,, poaching on the reserve larkrake Jan 2016 #28
Were they ever convicted of poaching? NobodyHere Jan 2016 #37
Does anybody besides me NobodyHere Jan 2016 #32
It doesn't sound right to me either. rtw Jan 2016 #33
Were they even convicted of poaching? NobodyHere Jan 2016 #34
Don't think so rtw Jan 2016 #36
the judge that gave the first reduced sentence was a wingnut who had no RIGHT to do so. JanMichael Jan 2016 #35
I'm not sure I'd equate rtw Jan 2016 #38
nit picking point. they are going and not playing cowfucking gunhumpers with the out of towners. nt JanMichael Jan 2016 #40
Well, the Bundy brothers are not out of towners rtw Jan 2016 #41
Nope. truebluegreen Jan 2016 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What exactly are the Or...»Reply #15