General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's perfectly clear that the ass who wrote those horrible letters to Bravenak has lost... [View all]HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Apparently there is more than one version of this letter. I've only seen one, and the version I saw was was printed in an over-sized font that makes a photo taken from a distance easily legible. Legible enough to be posted into social media and read That might mean, but wouldn't necessary mean, that it was intended to be used that way.
The large font size was selected likely by choice, it doesn't match the font on the picture of the envelope. There was either an unfamiliarity with how large fonts dry or an urgency that got one letter folded when it was still wet. Two copies of the letters are involved that wasn't an accident. I'm of the opinion that unusual things emerging from choices can be revealing, and perhaps these things are a clue for whatever professionals in whose hands any serious consideration rests.
I have received a creepy letter in response to an LTTE I had published in the Milw JS. There is no doubt I found that creepy and unsettling, so I do understand what such a letter can do.
While alternate scenarios and motivations can be postulated to explain limited facts, and while there is no way to sort them out from reading DU, what is certain is that no DUer should be threatened via DU posts, SU private mails, social media or through the USPS.