Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
Sun Jul 19, 2015, 02:17 PM Jul 2015

If McCain is a Hero are the people we sent to Guantanamo Heroes too? [View all]

I've read here that John McCain is a hero because he was captured and tortured during the viet nam war. I happen to think McCain is a war criminal, but that it was also wrong to torture him or anyone else. However, if those arguing that a person is a hero for enduring capture and torture during a war, even if that war was undeclared, even if the operations that got that person captured, bombing of a country that was not at war, was a war crime, then it seems to me, inescapably, that everyone we captured and sent to Guantanamo and tortured there were also heroes.


11 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
McCain is a hero but the people we sent to Guantanamo aren't.
5 (45%)
McCain is a hero and so are the people we sent to Guantanamo.
0 (0%)
McCain is not a hero and neither are the people we sent to Guantanamo.
6 (55%)
McCain is not a hero but the people we sent to Guantanamo are.
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
74 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All soldiers are mostly victims of manipulative warmongers of various grades and motives and times. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #1
Rec. n/t PowerToThePeople Jul 2015 #2
to me a war hero is someone who will give their life to stop a war olddots Jul 2015 #3
Victims. nt OnyxCollie Jul 2015 #4
McCain was in the military of his country fighting a war it was engaging in treestar Jul 2015 #5
Most of the people we put in guantanamo didn't do anything. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #7
McCain was part of what his country was doing treestar Jul 2015 #9
uh, we hung people after Nuremberg for that defense. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #10
There wasn't a Nuremberg after Vietnam treestar Jul 2015 #16
nor would there have been one after WWII if Germany hadn't been forced into an unconditional Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #19
I don't think many people think we committed war crimes treestar Jul 2015 #26
You'd be wrong. My Lai and similar massacres were most certainly war crimes. riderinthestorm Jul 2015 #29
Lt Calley was tried treestar Jul 2015 #30
Maybe there should have been. Exilednight Jul 2015 #61
Here you have some hope treestar Jul 2015 #64
So Kennedy and LBJ should have been prosecuted for war crimes? Lurks Often Jul 2015 #21
The air war started under LBJ. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #24
I think poster is trying to equate war crimes with going to war treestar Jul 2015 #27
Blowing up civilians is a war crime. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #34
See my #36, civilians dying collaterally in a military attack is not a war crime. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #39
The intention of much of the air war was to demoralize the civilian population. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #43
So now "demoralizing" is a war crime. Well a lot of folks have committed war crimes on me during my stevenleser Jul 2015 #48
no Steven, blowing up villagers to demoralize the survivors is a war crime. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #52
Neither of us lived through World War I or the civil war either. Can we not have opinions about stevenleser Jul 2015 #54
cite to the international law treestar Jul 2015 #62
Crimes against peace are an international crime and were one of the charges in Nuremberg. redgreenandblue Jul 2015 #49
Attacks against Al Qaeda and ISIS would not be crimes against peace. They have attacked us and other stevenleser Jul 2015 #50
The nazi troops also were not charged with crimes against peace. redgreenandblue Jul 2015 #74
armchair legal analysis treestar Jul 2015 #63
Why are you defending the Iraq war? redgreenandblue Jul 2015 #70
What? treestar Jul 2015 #72
It is a crime to start a war, and the US did that. nt redgreenandblue Jul 2015 #73
"Blowing up civilians is a war crime" Lurks Often Jul 2015 #44
That person and others here would agree with that. Problem is, international law does not agree. stevenleser Jul 2015 #46
yes absolutely. The drone war which indiscriminately targets civilians as long as the alleged Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #53
It's not a war crime. Your wishing it doesn't make it so. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #55
I do give you credit for not being a hypocrite, even if I disagree. Lurks Often Jul 2015 #56
Do you have cites to international law? treestar Jul 2015 #57
Correct. And the UN has ruled on this kind of stuff. They issued a statement after shock and awe stevenleser Jul 2015 #40
There were lots of war crimes committed by the US military in Vietnam YoungDemCA Jul 2015 #65
No we hung them for being war criminals and committing war crimes. Their defense didn't work. stevenleser Jul 2015 #35
Results... Major Nikon Jul 2015 #51
facepalm treestar Jul 2015 #66
Are you saying everyone who fought for the US in Vietnam is a war criminal? XRubicon Jul 2015 #6
No. I'm saying our bombing campaign qualified as a war crime. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #8
so bombing a country that was "not at war" is a war crime XRubicon Jul 2015 #11
Yes actually. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #14
Interesting XRubicon Jul 2015 #18
We committed war crimes in WWII - the fire bombing of Dresden, Tokyo and the nuking of Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #20
Wasn't North Vietnam the aggressor in the same way as North Korea was? Reter Jul 2015 #38
Has that been decided by any international tribunal? treestar Jul 2015 #58
No, it would not qualify as a war crime. Shock and awe was not a war crime either. Folks wrote stevenleser Jul 2015 #36
Hero. BlueStater Jul 2015 #12
Nah. I don't worship the military. Sorry that you do. Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #15
I don't "worship" anyone or anything. BlueStater Jul 2015 #17
"Other" H2O Man Jul 2015 #13
"Spiritually advanced individuals" -- I like it a lot. pacalo Jul 2015 #22
Maybe, sort of depends on who is doing the veneration HereSince1628 Jul 2015 #23
They might be somebody else's hero. n/t gollygee Jul 2015 #25
This is why he is heroic Kurska Jul 2015 #28
That is a fair point. I can't say for sure I would have done the same thing. I like to think I would stevenleser Jul 2015 #37
So how about the wrongly imprisoned guantanamo inmates? Warren Stupidity Jul 2015 #42
They may be heroes to people in their home towns. treestar Jul 2015 #67
And the US doesn't plan on giving most of the prisoners at Guantanamo trials, KitSileya Jul 2015 #68
There is some attempt to give them trials treestar Jul 2015 #71
Did you even read my post? Kurska Jul 2015 #69
Other Lordquinton Jul 2015 #31
McCain isn't a hero... he's a war criminal. harrose Jul 2015 #32
Did you see the show? XRubicon Jul 2015 #33
Post removed Post removed Jul 2015 #41
You can be a heroic POW but being a POW does not automatically make you a hero CBGLuthier Jul 2015 #45
They are all a hero to someone. nt. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #47
I'd imagine nations and cultures choose their own heroes LanternWaste Jul 2015 #59
Those hailed as a hero or heroine depends on the person or culture asked. Xyzse Jul 2015 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If McCain is a Hero are t...