Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
8. Press conferences are easier for a Prez with a transparent agenda, who is
Thu Jun 4, 2015, 01:13 AM
Jun 2015

not owned by wealthy private interests, and who has no reason or desire to lie...

Reporter: President Sanders, what is your position on the TPP?

Prez Bernie: I'm against it.

Reporter: Why is that, Mr. President?

Prez Bernie: The Trans Pacific Partnership is a disastrous trade agreement designed to protect the interests of the largest multi-national corporations at the expense of workers, consumers, the environment and the foundations of
American democracy. It will also negatively impact some of the poorest people in the world.

The TPP is a treaty that has been written behind closed doors by the corporate world.
Incredibly, while Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry and major media companies have full knowledge as to what
is in this treaty, the American people and members of Congress do not. They have been locked out of the process.

Further, all Americans, regardless of political ideology, should be opposed to the “fast track” process which
would deny Congress the right to amend the treaty and represent their constituents’ interests.

Let’s be clear: the TPP is much more than a “free trade” agreement.
It is part of a global race to the bottom to boost the profits of large corporations and Wall Street by outsourcing jobs; undercutting worker rights; dismantling labor, environmental, health, food safety and financial laws; and allowing corporations to challenge our laws in international tribunals rather than our own court system.


Press Conference Host: And there you have it, folks. Next week, President Sanders will be fielding questions about his recent Executive Order, guaranteeing protection from employment and housing discrimination for LGBT persons nationwide.

I'm Keith Olbermann. Good night, and Good Luck.

FDR held a press conference each week [View all] MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 OP
Maybe bluestateguy Jun 2015 #1
A good speaker can deal with these kinds of questions goldent Jun 2015 #10
Not to nitpick or anything, but it was two a week. peecoolyour Jun 2015 #2
I doubt Obama could get away with an FDR type press conference. Hoyt Jun 2015 #3
FDR's press conferences were off the record. In our media age, I don't see it happening. fishwax Jun 2015 #4
that, and journalists had more integrity back then. KMOD Jun 2015 #5
Perhaps you are correct nadinbrzezinski Jun 2015 #11
Transcript about his "off the record" policy: joshcryer Jun 2015 #12
Damn, he obviously did not TM99 Jun 2015 #6
See above posts, he did and then some. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #13
He also had a longstanding affair and imprisoned American citizens. MADem Jun 2015 #7
Technically: FDR did *not* order mass internment of Japanese, Germans and Italians. ieoeja Jun 2015 #34
Technically, the Inquisition never executed anyone. malthaussen Jun 2015 #36
I did not know that. Here's another oddity: ieoeja Jun 2015 #41
Basically, the Church had no secular power. malthaussen Jun 2015 #42
He signed the order that enabled incarcerations. MADem Jun 2015 #39
Press conferences are easier for a Prez with a transparent agenda, who is Zorra Jun 2015 #8
/\_/\_This right here_/\_/\ Scuba Jun 2015 #15
He kinda already does... dirtydickcheney Jun 2015 #9
Any reaction to the substance of Clinton's call geek tragedy Jun 2015 #14
The problem with having a lengthy political history is you can't just make speeches. jeff47 Jun 2015 #16
the attack on voting rights didn't really begin until she was out of the Senate. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #17
She left the Senate in 1865? jeff47 Jun 2015 #18
the trend in voting rights had actually been fairly positive up until 2008. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #19
And that still doesn't mean more early voting was bad in 2001. jeff47 Jun 2015 #20
If you want the cynical answer, it's that she's speaking on an issue that's very near and dear geek tragedy Jun 2015 #21
Which is entirely my point. If the position is in a speech only because it can win an election jeff47 Jun 2015 #23
we probably have different views of politicians and positions. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #24
When they are making a speech, they aren't making promises. They're making a speech. jeff47 Jun 2015 #25
she's very publicly arguing for a very progressive policy position. which is great. geek tragedy Jun 2015 #27
:eyes: jeff47 Jun 2015 #29
her record on voting rights was bad before? geek tragedy Jun 2015 #30
Bernie does an hour long call-in session with Thom Hartmann weekly riderinthestorm Jun 2015 #22
Look- I like Bernie but Thom Hartman is on his side Beaverhausen Jun 2015 #33
He has went on O'Reilly. peecoolyour Jun 2015 #35
Thom Hartman isn't calling into the Thom Hartman Show asking Sanders questions.. frylock Jun 2015 #37
Thom doesn't screen the calls. Anyone can talk to Bernie riderinthestorm Jun 2015 #43
That's what made me think of this. nt MannyGoldstein Jun 2015 #40
I can't see why Bernie would stop doing this riderinthestorm Jun 2015 #45
KInda what we wanted Obama to do ...and use it to hammer on the obstructionist repukes. L0oniX Jun 2015 #26
Nice to say but things preempt them.... Historic NY Jun 2015 #28
I hope he wouldn't waste his time in a non-controlled environment. NCTraveler Jun 2015 #31
Was he tormented for years by the press as Hillary has been? Beaverhausen Jun 2015 #32
good luck with that strategy.. frylock Jun 2015 #38
Bernie has nothing to hide LittleBlue Jun 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FDR held a press conferen...»Reply #8