Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How about it? [View all]skepticscott
(13,029 posts)65. And equally telling is your inability to address ANY
of the points I raised. Instead, you try to point some vague finger back at me. But please, tell us what you see in your crystal ball about me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hell, with all the basing of Hilary I have read on this board I thought I had stumbled into Repukia.
olegramps
May 2015
#100
I've been judiciously scanning the pages, and avoiding the hyperbolic hyperbole postings.
NBachers
May 2015
#3
I'll tell you we Are going to get a Democrat in the White House Again after President Obama and he
Cha
May 2015
#9
SORRY! Meant to say say that the 2016 elections are more than 12 months away.
maddiemom
May 2015
#99
I mean no one cares. That's what I mean. Especially when someone is screaming
Number23
May 2015
#124
Gee, I consider myself a "real person" and I actually wanted to vote for Obama. Twice.
DanTex
May 2015
#60
Clearly we need a web site for only positive news about Democrats, we can call it
whereisjustice
May 2015
#23
So if one candidate for the nomination has 100 negatives and 1 positive....
whereisjustice
May 2015
#112
Small positives don't out weigh massive negatives, I'm going to call out your false equivalence
whereisjustice
May 2015
#117
and another personal attack from you. lol @ your grammar police schtick, the last refuge
whereisjustice
May 2015
#119
Strictly positive: I see H. Clinton win D. primary, then presidential election.
Yorktown
May 2015
#31
? He always said he would not run as a spoiler. Weeks ago, he said he would run as a Democrat.
merrily
May 2015
#49
He's actually on the registered list of folks running for the Democratic nomination
stevenleser
May 2015
#114
I see, you think Skinner should have just left her unable to post about her
boston bean
May 2015
#50
what is rather telling is your support for that poster in regards to these posts. nt
boston bean
May 2015
#62
I try to takeaway the most petulant and irrelevant things about many OPs too.
LanternWaste
May 2015
#66
I can't speak to the hidden posts because I didn't see them, but how does one get that many?
MadDAsHell
May 2015
#83
So you attack the person with a non-sequitur rather than address the content of the OP?
stevenleser
May 2015
#115
Great OP! Of course, MY candidate is pefect. YOUR candidate is is one step above a republican. (Or
pampango
May 2015
#51
Bwah! You couldn't post something about the both of them without pushing Hillary and denigrating
djean111
May 2015
#52
Is it legitimate to indicate why we don't support one candidate or the other?
totodeinhere
May 2015
#95
Or coming from the other side suggesting that Bernie is not sensitive to issues of race. n/t
totodeinhere
May 2015
#96
Nice thought but it doesn't reflect the way most of us make our choices...
I hate liars
May 2015
#76
OK Nance you answered my question upthread. I have no problem with your analysis. n/t
totodeinhere
May 2015
#97
I'm thinking the game changes dramatically with O'Malley's announcement.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2015
#77
My first choice is Bernie, and I'm going to agree completely with this post.
mountain grammy
May 2015
#102