Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
59. Where are your facts?
Fri May 1, 2015, 09:16 AM
May 2015

Obama has sided with Wall Street to the point where not even the banksters who tossed millions out of their homes illegally are walking free, including one sitting in his Cabinet.



An Interview with Tim Anderson on Obama's Commerce Nominee, Penny Pritzker, the Sub-Prime Queen

The Privilege of the Pritzkers

by DENNIS BERNSTEIN
CounterPunch, May 3-5, 2013

EXCERPT...

TA: $38 billion. One publication listed eight casinos, another listed 13, with each license worth a half a million dollars. There is another $5-7 billion in casinos. When you own 13 casinos for 5-7 billion, you are a player in the casino business. That’s just the hotels and casinos. There are many other companies they own such as the second largest chewing tobacco company, which they sold for 3.5 billion dollars. They actually owned the second and third largest chewing tobacco company, but have since off-loaded those for billions of dollars. Many of their assets are not what society considers clean assets, but hey don’t care. As far as money goes, they want it. When it comes to casinos or chewing tobacco companies, they don’t care. Their wealth is almost incalculable, because according to Forbes magazine, they are the only family in America to have off shore tax-free trusts because they were grandfathered in. Their off shore trust can ship money back to their family tax-free. It was grandfathered in because their grandfather got it through Congress – he was smart to see the future and got it done. Congress closed the loophole and grandfathered him in. Forbesmagazine wrote about the Pritzker’s off shore trust, they emphasized that there are over 1000 separate trusts. Many families have two or three different savings accounts to keep track of what money belongs to who, but when you have over 1000 different trusts to handle the family estate it’s very hard to comprehend how much wealth there is and how many businesses they control. A few years ago, Penny sold TransUnion, the largest credit reporting agency in America, but there’s a question about whether she sold it to herself by selling it to various hedge funds which her family has a large interest in. Until she sold it, you could say that Penny Pritzker had more files on every citizen in America than the CIA and FBI combined, because everybody has a credit score and credit report. Penny Pritzker had the credit scores and report on every single citizen in America.

SNIP...

TA: She had TransUnion while she had Superior Bank, so she controlled the credit scores of everybody who was getting a subprime loan. You pay a higher interest on your subprime loan based on your credit score. Whether or not it was ever brokered between the credit bureau and the bank, we don’t know, but we know the same people control both entities.

SNIP...

TA: Superior Bank was acquired back in 1989 as part of the original savings and loan giveaway by M, D and E Wall. As I wrote a in a paper for an economic conference in Denver, Superior Bank was sold to the Pritzkers for 42.5 million dollars. They changed the name from Lion Savings and Loan to Superior Bank after they acquired it. Lion Savings and Loan was sold to the Pritzkers just to put up money for the capital. But as government reports show, they only put up a million dollars cash and pledged their assets as the difference, the capital. That’s not supposed to be done, but they are privileged people so they get privileged deals. After they acquired this for $1 million they also got $640 million in tax credits.

SNIP...

TA: The tax credits were designed so they could use it in any entity they wanted. They didn’t have to use it on what they bought. It could be sold on the open market for value, the credits could be used to file back taxes or warehouse them for future taxes. So for a million dollars, they got 640 million dollars for agreeing to take over Superior Bank, which they then looted for years then gave it back to the government with an enormous loss to the uninsured depositors and the whole subprime industry.

CONTINUED...

http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/05/03/the-privilege-of-the-pritzkers/


PS: I don't have anything against rich people, per se. I'd just like to see the offices and powers of the government go toward helping somebody other than the rich. For a change.
Obama should do nothing... [View all] Drunken Irishman May 2015 OP
Well, Obama should do nothing if he does it only to get praise. merrily May 2015 #1
It's not about getting praise - it's about complaining for the sake of complaining. Drunken Irishman May 2015 #2
I knew what you meant. I was going off your "Obama should do nothing." merrily May 2015 #3
Ah. I agree. I was just using hyperbolic language haha Drunken Irishman May 2015 #4
"That constant complaining, finding a wrong in every good thing, is maddening. " joshcryer May 2015 #6
You can't do a thing about the complaining, only about how you react to it. merrily May 2015 #7
It gets to you eventually. joshcryer May 2015 #10
Only if you let it. The complaining is on the complainers. The reaction to the complaining is on you merrily May 2015 #13
Re-read post #10. joshcryer May 2015 #15
Don't need to. I understood it the first time. I don't think you understood my post. merrily May 2015 #21
Something is always better than nothing. joshcryer May 2015 #5
Does it really help? TM99 May 2015 #8
Yes. Drunken Irishman May 2015 #9
My mom is literally in the bottom 1% with Social Security. joshcryer May 2015 #14
I just don't agree. TM99 May 2015 #19
That is a strategy for complete failure. Adrahil May 2015 #23
Actually, quite the opposite. TM99 May 2015 #25
Well you keep trying that... Adrahil May 2015 #31
That's your prerogative. TM99 May 2015 #39
As it is your prerogative to be an ideologue. Politics involves an opposition. KittyWampus May 2015 #46
I am fascinated always by the projection. TM99 May 2015 #51
I think the Supreme Court blocked countrywide Medicaid expansion, but let's blame Obama. Hoyt May 2015 #35
An astute politician TM99 May 2015 #40
Never good enough for some folks. Hoyt May 2015 #64
You are emotionally defending TM99 May 2015 #66
No. I'm saying Obama will never be good enough for some people. Hoyt May 2015 #67
That is still about emotional defense. TM99 May 2015 #68
Did you watch or read Obama's 2012 nomination speech? joshcryer May 2015 #12
I did. TM99 May 2015 #16
I've always said he should've dropped a "legislative bomb." joshcryer May 2015 #18
I would have had a great deal more respect TM99 May 2015 #20
"Reagan, Bush 1, Clinton, and Bush 2 got a lot of what they wanted" BumRushDaShow May 2015 #22
I am bi-racial so you can let up TM99 May 2015 #24
What you "are" is a non sequitur BumRushDaShow May 2015 #28
If my racial identity is now irrelevant TM99 May 2015 #37
Nope BumRushDaShow May 2015 #44
Yup! TM99 May 2015 #48
"a smart man, a kind man, even a good man" BumRushDaShow May 2015 #54
Your case is faulty from the start. TM99 May 2015 #57
I have no problem with people disagreeing with this policies BumRushDaShow May 2015 #61
You put quote marks around gay rights, Obama advanced 'gay rights' you said, dismissing the worth Bluenorthwest May 2015 #62
You so misunderstand my posts, TM99 May 2015 #69
Exactly BRDS. Cha May 2015 #49
Excellent post. "He has consistently governed as a Reagan Democrat." woo me with science May 2015 #29
I call bullshit on your "reagun democrat" label.. it's just a nasty cheap ignorant pot shot. It Cha May 2015 #34
Call away but you are wrong. TM99 May 2015 #38
No, you're wrong.. all you have is a clueless label. You haven't been paying attention. Cha May 2015 #45
I backed up my 'clueless label' with facts TM99 May 2015 #53
No, you didn't.. keep digging. Cha May 2015 #55
I see you have nothing then. TM99 May 2015 #58
Here, have a lookie BumRushDaShow May 2015 #63
Where are your facts? Octafish May 2015 #59
Where in this oft-cited interview quote BumRushDaShow May 2015 #52
Read the linked to article. TM99 May 2015 #56
The article has been around along time BumRushDaShow May 2015 #60
More manipulative Third Way talking points. woo me with science May 2015 #11
While you attempt to reframe every topic on which you disagree as 'Third Way'. randome May 2015 #41
How long has Congress done nothing and how do we feel about that? liberal N proud May 2015 #17
Welcome to DU3! freshwest May 2015 #26
"In a Heavy-bottom pot" BumRushDaShow May 2015 #30
Adorable pic, fresh.. me I use my awesome air popper.. Cha May 2015 #33
Obama applied for the job. The job is very difficult. A lot of money was spent, a lot of effort - djean111 May 2015 #27
Yeah, the anonymous internet wouldn't have been jumping on to complain about what the Cha May 2015 #32
And once something gets don fadedrose May 2015 #36
But if he does nothing and DU doesn't complain Capt. Obvious May 2015 #42
I'm sure DIrish would love not to have to read the constant whining about nothing. Cha May 2015 #47
I don't think he should, or does, make any decision based on what morningfog May 2015 #43
K&R a whole bunch!!!!! Homer Wells May 2015 #50
I hope my thoughts didn't come across as complaining. KMOD May 2015 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Obama should do nothing.....»Reply #59