Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

msongs

(67,405 posts)

10. that's because Obama Inc. is a people - according to our friend Mitt anyway nt

Reply to Quantess (Reply #9)

Sun Apr 26, 2015, 04:45 AM

Apr 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] KMOD Apr 2015 OP

The bottom line is this: Cali_Democrat Apr 2015 #1

And just how can they read thousands of pages of legislation to be able to sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #2

Darrell Issa provided those leaks, not wikileaks: ucrdem Apr 2015 #8

Then Congress can reject both fast track and TPP. Cali_Democrat Apr 2015 #15

They're just being disingenuous.. did ya see Schumer's statement, Cali?.. Cha Apr 2015 #6

thanks KMOD.. from your link.. Cha Apr 2015 #3

Well, they made Mitt's day anyway. ucrdem Apr 2015 #4

Thank you, KMOD. In other words, it's only been like this for EIGHTY-ONE YEARS. Hekate Apr 2015 #5

Just because it started with Gerald Ford doesn't mean it's ok AZ Progressive Apr 2015 #7

Every President, starting with and including Nixon, has de-regulated. merrily Apr 2015 #11

"We've always done it that way" starts wearing thin as a justification for bad policy. Buns_of_Fire Apr 2015 #12

Poor Obama, getting his feelings hurt. Quantess Apr 2015 #9

that's because Obama Inc. is a people - according to our friend Mitt anyway nt msongs Apr 2015 #10

I wish fast track authority would be used to end poverty, debt, war, or provide a job midnight Apr 2015 #13

Yeah, reaching consensus is messy. Too effing bad. Agony Apr 2015 #14

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #10