General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: SICK SICK SICK SICK SICK woman puts arrow in cat's head - cheers on FB. And she's a vet! *GRAPHIC* [View all]eggplant
(3,911 posts)On Fri Apr 17, 2015, 10:27 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Devil's advocate post...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6525360
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
some sick fuck shots an arrow through someone's pet cat and this DU'er wants to play devil's advocate? It is so insensitive and disturbing. Please hide this.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Apr 17, 2015, 10:38 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Oh, please, find a fainting couch. The post was completely respectful.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: OK. I'll preface this by saying that I trashed the thread in question the instant I saw the title, as I automatically do with anything that looks as if it might be dealing with cruelty to children or animals. Just can't handle those topics as all.
That said, what the heck is up with all these alerts trying to squelch what amounts to nothing more than an opposing opinion? Did killing Free Speech become a Progressive value when I wasn't looking? Put the person on "ignore" if you need to, but quit with the business of hiding anything you object to.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Wtf! Whether you meant this or not wtf!
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.