Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madokie

(51,076 posts)
6. The whole premise of what you're saying is bullshit
Tue May 1, 2012, 08:39 AM
May 2012

Their mission was to capture him if possible, kill him if not.
Who is this high ranking military officer anyway, I suspect it is someone someone pulled out of their ass.

NO, that would have put the Bush crime family in an embarassing position... rfranklin May 2012 #1
Pass Ohio Joe May 2012 #2
yes, of course quinnox May 2012 #3
You got that right. nt raccoon May 2012 #14
Had they taken him alive we'd have seen American Solomon May 2012 #4
What, you think al-Qaeda needs an excuse to take hostages and blow stuff up? leveymg May 2012 #8
While I agree that al Qaeda doesn't need an excuse to kidnap and kill... CherokeeDem May 2012 #10
It was just simpler for everyone involved to kill him. leveymg May 2012 #16
that is interesting logic quinnox May 2012 #9
Well, I disagree. I think his death demoralized Solomon May 2012 #35
That's Bin Laden's argument: They MADE us do it. nt Romulox May 2012 #13
That was my thinking, too. No American traveling abroad, anywhere, would have been safe. n/t Ian David May 2012 #21
Only if it would have been an advantage for the republicans mucifer May 2012 #5
The whole premise of what you're saying is bullshit madokie May 2012 #6
The fact that he was killed while unarmed lends some credence to the premise. Prometheus Bound May 2012 #12
In an age of suicide bombers I am not sure "unarmed" still means what it use to do. hack89 May 2012 #24
The possible chance that this is propaganda carries a lot of weight madokie May 2012 #32
More coverup of the worst crimes of the century. leveymg May 2012 #7
I'll pass. There is no right or wrong answer. Scuba May 2012 #11
If they thought they had any chance at it, perhaps, Arkana May 2012 #15
That's complete nonsense. All they had to do was grab him instead of shooting him. leveymg May 2012 #18
A corpse can't resist ... can't call out for help. JoePhilly May 2012 #25
In an age of suicide bombers, would that necessarily be the smart thing to do? hack89 May 2012 #26
UBL wasn't the suicide bomber type. leveymg May 2012 #31
Yes. mmonk May 2012 #17
No. They did the right thing. HappyMe May 2012 #19
Moot Question? lacrew May 2012 #20
If you ever capture James Bond, you just shoot him. Same with OBL. n/t Ian David May 2012 #22
Capturing OBL from mommy's basement is easy ... doing it in Pakistan is a little harder. JoePhilly May 2012 #23
Am I the only one who wonders if they really did kill him? riderinthestorm May 2012 #27
This message was self-deleted by its author quinnox May 2012 #28
As someone "cursed" to be born with a mind that questions things quinnox May 2012 #29
Is there any proof he wasn't captured? NCTraveler May 2012 #30
This depressing poll shows just how little hope we have anymore. n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #33
Oh please RZM May 2012 #34
Obviously it is easier and more expedient. And just as obviously you haven't thought this through Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #38
I think that would have been preferable BUT impossible to do without any members of the Seals jillan May 2012 #36
He would have been...problematic...for the Obama administration, alive. Poll_Blind May 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the US have tried ...»Reply #6