General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Good Thing, Or A Bad Thing, For Hillary To Not Have An ACTUAL Challenger In The Primaries... [View all]Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)But, primaries between centrists never do well for the Democratic Party, at all. The Republicans just keep a list of the mud slinging and hideous things Democratic candidates say to each other during our primaries. They turn around and bring those things up after the primaries are over. So, really, Democrats have done their work for them. We really need to stop doing their work for them. They never learn. They are the perpetual cheaters who have been getting by with it far too long.
Lately, it seems Democratic primaries have gotten worse. Remember how brutal the last few primaries we have had for presidential elections have been? Honestly, with Jeb Bush in the running this time around, I don't want any mud slinging against whatever Democrat ends up as the most likely nominee. I would vote for a rattlesnake, if I have to, to try to fight Jeb Bush getting anywhere near the White House. Then again, I think it would be kind of cool to have a rattlesnake for president, if it was at least a left of center rattlesnake. No foreign leaders or Republicans would dare try to piss off a left leaning rattlesnake. They would be afraid of those dual "veto pens." We need a left leaning rattlesnake to become a star in the party for 2020, if 2016 turns out as vomitous as I am afraid it will turn out. I do NOT want to see Jeb Bush as president.