Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fast-Track Treason and the Coming Corporate Coup: Calling Out TPP Traitors [View all]cascadiance
(19,537 posts)158. So basically you are calling Senator Bernie Sanders a liar then...
I'm betting he has far more knowledge of what is going on behind the scenes than you. If not, then that's another example of why congress isn't involved enough at this point.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/incomprehensible-secrecy-u-s-senator-bernie-sanders-demands-release-of-corporate-friendly-trans-pacific-partnership-trade-agreement-text/5423209
It is incomprehensible to me that the leaders of major corporate interests are actively involved in the writing of the TPP, while the elected officials of this country have little or no knowledge as to what is in it, says senator.
Corporations have been making quite a bit more money paying LESS taxes through offshore tax sheltering, etc. and have been outsourcing our labor, etc. and just rewarding the wealthy owners instead of their employees. WHY do you think they need more money, than they get now. Especially if they are likely making the wealth/power divide equation even more in their favor with the TPP that they are BUYING congress people to put in place now! They wouldn't be buying congressmen if it weren't beneficial to them.
Clinton signed NAFTA, the Telecomm Act, etc. that he was trying to extoll the virtues of a lot at the time, which he shouldn't have then too. I see no reason to trust what Obama as doing now as being "better" this time, especially when it is being done in secret.
If it IS completed soon, it will just be one more thing besides the UN that the right will complain about the DEMOCRATS giving away our nation's sovereignty to, when the democratic constituency want NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CRAP and would agree with them here! Whoever the Democratic nominee is, they will have trouble BECAUSE of the TPP passing! If the Democrats fight this and show backbone in standing up for American jobs and our sovereignty, then I'm betting they will be rewarded in 2016, when the nation gets more fed up with corporatist cancer infestation that we have destroying our government now!
Why would you trust someone from Citigroup to negotiate on the people's behalf and not for corporations' interests. Froman won't give us a "good deal".
If we want to stop this thing, we need to stop Fast Track NOW! Only by doing that will this treaty get the full public review that our founders would have felt required for a democracy like us to have to put it in to law and not destroy what they created for us.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
179 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Fast-Track Treason and the Coming Corporate Coup: Calling Out TPP Traitors [View all]
99th_Monkey
Feb 2015
OP
Let's be real -- As of yet, Obama does not have Fast-Track authority, and he won't likely get it.
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#1
It's not finished. Tribunal process will likely be same as that in other trade deals
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#9
I would suggest looking it up, you might feel a little better about what MIGHT happen, assuming
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#23
The tribunals don't override "federal, state and local laws." Would like to see an example if
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#73
Please show me one case where a tribunal has overridden "federal, state or local" law..
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#84
Not finished yet (which you know), but no nation is going to agree to what you are spreading.
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#89
Yes we can, you obviously didn't study why we can't have dolphin safe tuna labels, huh?
cascadiance
Feb 2015
#167
"If America doesn't come first to you, then you hate America." USA! USA! USA!
pampango
Feb 2015
#107
Of course not. No more than whites, men, straights, etc. should come second, third or last.
pampango
Feb 2015
#112
Why does there have to be a 'place' for Blacks, gays, women or the "American home team"?
pampango
Feb 2015
#117
My 'place' is shared with everyone regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, nationality or sexual
pampango
Feb 2015
#146
""TPP is a good idea" you mean these opinion surveys that are estimates or guesses at best?"
pampango
Feb 2015
#106
I really doubt that Democrats are 'guessing' about their preferences as much as republicans are.
pampango
Feb 2015
#110
Does that include Central Americans and South Americans or only USA Americans? USA! USA!
pampango
Feb 2015
#148
Should Congress have the right to CHANGE this agreement, to amend it, to iow, WRITE our Legislation,
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#69
Your argument is very naive. Pres Obama has been orchestrating this agreement.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#62
I think you are just unfairly bashing Obama.. Wait and see what if anything he endorses.
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#63
Oh plez spare me the "If you don't bow down, then you are bashing." Bullcrap.
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#66
I'm sick of hearing "you must hate Obama" as a response to any suggestion of criticism or
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#78
"Is a treasonous agreement a good deal?" Accusing him of negotiating 'treason' is not the same as
pampango
Feb 2015
#108
Any one who does not know that tea partiers accuse Obama of treason is not paying
pampango
Feb 2015
#116
They regularly accuse Obama of being a liberal, open-borders, globalist, traitor. Check it yourself.
pampango
Feb 2015
#127
You don't care what the far-right says. If blissful ignorance is your preferred state, be my guest.
pampango
Feb 2015
#133
we have every right to question or criticise an agreement that reportedly cedes our and
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#125
I agree. We all have the right to question every policy put forward by anyone.
pampango
Feb 2015
#128
the agreement was described as traitorous in your excerpt, not the president. and if it
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#129
I disagree. Questioning a policy is appropriate. We all do it. DU would not exist without that.
pampango
Feb 2015
#132
You don't know him any better than I. I don't hate him but expect him to represent the lower classes
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#130
He's done none of those things. In fact, the so-called Catfood Commission proposed raising Social
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#135
So you claim that the Chained CPI would have been beneficial to the middle and lower classes?
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#138
Yes, if Social Security payments were increased for those on low end, it would by definition help
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#141
You are changing the game. I claimed that Wheeler originally proposed to give the
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#171
I can't believe you. Tom Wheeler and the two Republicans make a proposal to allow the
rhett o rick
Feb 2015
#174
You obviously don't read widely if you think CS Monitor is conservative. Fact is,
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#175
Woody, would care about the poor doing better. In today's economy, that means helping produce
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#142
Yes, Woody Guthrie singing along with pharma CEOs and the US Chamber of Commerce
brentspeak
Feb 2015
#149
Obama put the Social Security cut in his own fucking budget, your attack is a delusional
TheKentuckian
Feb 2015
#161
I read his response, it's not very encouraging when we allow Foreign Corporations to write our laws
sabrina 1
Feb 2015
#68
No it does not. The "tribunals" which are in existing agreements, including European Union,
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#42
I thought it was treason to interfere with the President's foreign policy initiatives?
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#2
Well, once US sovereignty is deliberately & completely undermined by corporate Int'l tribunals..
99th_Monkey
Feb 2015
#3
The RW is also accusing Obama of treason on other issues. Using treason as a mere rhetorical
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#92
One side yells, "Obama is a traitor for the TPP!" the other side yells, "Obama is a traitor for his
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#95
Hey, I never said the man was immune from pursuing bad policies and doing so in a bad way.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#97
Betraying one's country by secretly ceding its sovereignty to global Oligarchs
99th_Monkey
Feb 2015
#16
Then please explain why Labor & Environmental advocates aren't championing TPP
99th_Monkey
Feb 2015
#55
Good luck. I think you'd be better off promoting trade and taxing the heck out of those
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#59
Once Hillary is anointed and coronated, we wont be able to talk about issues like this
Ramses
Feb 2015
#61
"I still regret not doing more to strengthen the North American Free Trade Act's labor and
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#81
Why would I give anyone credit when everything's done in secret? I don't give reich much
ND-Dem
Feb 2015
#85
But you seem to "know" that this secret agreement is going to be "good" for us.
cascadiance
Feb 2015
#152
It's done like that because complicated negotiations won't accomplish anything if done in
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#155
But who's doing most of the "negotiations" in secret? Corporate entities! That is NOT democracy!
cascadiance
Feb 2015
#156
Wrong again. Corporations are not negotiating the TPP. It's government officials from the various
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#157
He told us few days ago. You were more concerned with supposed threats to "national sovereignty"
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#163
Did he tell us why he needs Fast Track Authority to pass this bill and it should be done in secret?
cascadiance
Feb 2015
#164
Actually there are people who are against anything Obama does, even when beneficial.
Hoyt
Feb 2015
#166
You and others ARE NOT explaining what is beneficial, just playing the "hater" card! TYPICAL!
cascadiance
Feb 2015
#168