Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]freshwest
(53,661 posts)76. NNOOO!!1!!!! You get right back here so we can give you a damn good thrashing!!
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
At least she didnt shoot her friend in the face, not all can say the same.
Thinkingabout
Feb 2015
#1
Do you adore her being buddy-buddy with Scalia? Having fun with him on vacations?
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#18
It surely hasn't changed her views and her advocation for those views, so no, I am not
hlthe2b
Feb 2015
#26
Who cares about her private life? Their friendship sure hasn't influenced her votes or opinions.
merrily
Feb 2015
#49
No, she does not oppose reproductive choice. That is a misinterpretation of her comments.
merrily
Feb 2015
#58
Have her out of court comments affected any case? Also, I don't think you get it.
merrily
Feb 2015
#61
IOW, you know of no case at all in which Ginsburg has restricted freedom of choice. Good news.
merrily
Feb 2015
#82
Voice of reason, HA! The voice of mouthing off without knowing what you are talking about---
merrily
Feb 2015
#86
It might have influenced her not to retire. He could be encouraging her to stay on the Court as long as possible
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#89
Pure speculation, except the part that seems like it could be somewhat sexist assumption.
merrily
Feb 2015
#90
Me too, but I am lookin forward to President Sanders nominating RBG's replacement.
InAbLuEsTaTe
Feb 2015
#54
Don't like lifetime judicial appointments? GEt an amendment to the constitution passed.
MohRokTah
Feb 2015
#4
You're asking her to step aside. You're definitely the one who needs convincing
muriel_volestrangler
Feb 2015
#95
And yet she's such great friends with Scalia. How can she stand to be near him? n/t
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#19
More than one probably, and Thomas never recuses himself when he should. He needs impeachment.
merrily
Feb 2015
#66
A little candor and self-deprication can be refreshing.. lighten up ... no biggie. -nt-
99th_Monkey
Feb 2015
#14
You are assuming that the next President will be a Democrat, and there will be a more liberal Senate
pnwmom
Feb 2015
#23
HooKAY, well at least *I* know when I've made my point and then exit. Nighty-night, All!1 LOVEYAn/t
UTUSN
Feb 2015
#32
NNOOO!!1!!!! You get right back here so we can give you a damn good thrashing!!
freshwest
Feb 2015
#76
Hell, NO. There's nothing wrong with her mind. She had a few pops, she wasn't allowed to
MADem
Feb 2015
#33
I'm not comparing Ginsberg to Douglas, I'm saying the court would let us know if someone was
FSogol
Feb 2015
#110
Never worry about what Republicans will or might say or are saying. They are always saying ugly
merrily
Feb 2015
#45
If we're stuck with Thomas and Scalia, they can just deal with Ginsburg. nt
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2015
#47
"This is not about you, my Justice GINSBURG."? Then why are you making it about her?
uppityperson
Feb 2015
#68
I'm puzzled by the CAPS used in typing her last name, so here are others falling asleep while
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2015
#99
Would you be so kind as to explain your choice to use all caps when typing Ginsburg?
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2015
#107