Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
76. NNOOO!!1!!!! You get right back here so we can give you a damn good thrashing!!
Sat Feb 14, 2015, 01:27 AM
Feb 2015


At least she didnt shoot her friend in the face, not all can say the same. Thinkingabout Feb 2015 #1
None of the Supremes have done that. nt arthritisR_US Feb 2015 #48
no, just the vice president ND-Dem Feb 2015 #65
And as far as I recall there was little to zero arthritisR_US Feb 2015 #91
really? It endears her to me even more. I adore Ruth Bader Ginsberg. hlthe2b Feb 2015 #2
Do you adore her being buddy-buddy with Scalia? Having fun with him on vacations? pnwmom Feb 2015 #18
It surely hasn't changed her views and her advocation for those views, so no, I am not hlthe2b Feb 2015 #26
Who cares about her private life? Their friendship sure hasn't influenced her votes or opinions. merrily Feb 2015 #49
She opposes Roe V Wade now. mr_liberal Feb 2015 #56
No, she does not oppose reproductive choice. That is a misinterpretation of her comments. merrily Feb 2015 #58
She says now that it was wrongly decided, mr_liberal Feb 2015 #60
Have her out of court comments affected any case? Also, I don't think you get it. merrily Feb 2015 #61
Many states would have kept abortion illegal without Roe mr_liberal Feb 2015 #73
Since you seem to want to nail Justice Ginsberg to the cross. William769 Feb 2015 #77
Where did I say anything about her decisions? mr_liberal Feb 2015 #81
That's what I thought. Typical. William769 Feb 2015 #83
Factual. Logical. Correct. Any one of those words. eom mr_liberal Feb 2015 #85
IOW, you know of no case at all in which Ginsburg has restricted freedom of choice. Good news. merrily Feb 2015 #82
Mandated ultra sounds can be ruled unconstitutional. mr_liberal Feb 2015 #84
Voice of reason, HA! The voice of mouthing off without knowing what you are talking about--- merrily Feb 2015 #86
There are many pro-choice lawyers and legal scholars . . . markpkessinger Feb 2015 #94
It might have influenced her not to retire. He could be encouraging her to stay on the Court as long as possible pnwmom Feb 2015 #89
Pure speculation, except the part that seems like it could be somewhat sexist assumption. merrily Feb 2015 #90
I have to agree. prayin4rain Feb 2015 #108
Sure, why not? SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #104
Yeah, but when your friend does some really messed up stuff F4lconF16 Feb 2015 #105
I'm not one to give up friendships over politics SickOfTheOnePct Feb 2015 #106
Me too, but I am lookin forward to President Sanders nominating RBG's replacement. InAbLuEsTaTe Feb 2015 #54
No fucking way. PeaceNikki Feb 2015 #3
I'm not the enemy. n/t UTUSN Feb 2015 #5
OK, but RBG isn't either. PeaceNikki Feb 2015 #97
I like her honesty. greatauntoftriplets Feb 2015 #6
+1 National treasure is right. And they ain't making them like her anymore. merrily Feb 2015 #51
Don't like lifetime judicial appointments? GEt an amendment to the constitution passed. MohRokTah Feb 2015 #4
Exactly. If she wants to stay on a couple more years for a mr_liberal Feb 2015 #62
Oh ye of little faith.... eom MohRokTah Feb 2015 #69
Faith? I prefer being rational eom. mr_liberal Feb 2015 #75
The Notorious RBG thanks you for your sage advice REP Feb 2015 #7
& relay my "you're welcome" will you?!1 Thanks. n.t UTUSN Feb 2015 #10
She says: REP Feb 2015 #11
Perfect malokvale77 Feb 2015 #40
+1 merrily Feb 2015 #50
Lol... Thread win. Eom corkhead Feb 2015 #67
Makes her more like a normal person. cherokeeprogressive Feb 2015 #8
It was a speech. She was listening to it, not giving it. madamesilverspurs Feb 2015 #9
*I'm* not the one who needs convincing. n/t UTUSN Feb 2015 #12
Aren't you the one who wrote the OP? (nt) malokvale77 Feb 2015 #43
You're asking her to step aside. You're definitely the one who needs convincing muriel_volestrangler Feb 2015 #95
And yet she's such great friends with Scalia. How can she stand to be near him? n/t pnwmom Feb 2015 #19
Who gives a crap what the wingnuts think? bluedigger Feb 2015 #13
Sincere thanks you realize it's all about propaganda points. n/t UTUSN Feb 2015 #16
They have a SCJ who sleeps on the bench and evades his taxes. bluedigger Feb 2015 #22
More than one probably, and Thomas never recuses himself when he should. He needs impeachment. merrily Feb 2015 #66
The Notorious RBG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MADem Feb 2015 #37
A little candor and self-deprication can be refreshing.. lighten up ... no biggie. -nt- 99th_Monkey Feb 2015 #14
Don't step down nakocal Feb 2015 #15
You are assuming that the next President will be a Democrat, and there will be a more liberal Senate pnwmom Feb 2015 #23
Bush was drunk most of his Presidency Ramses Feb 2015 #17
Too bad when someone is honest some folks have a problem with that still_one Feb 2015 #20
It's not a problem of her honesty. It's a matter of helping or hurting. And UTUSN Feb 2015 #24
With a GOP - controlled Senate? Yeah, great plan (not). MADem Feb 2015 #35
Are you kidding? malokvale77 Feb 2015 #46
your concern is noted Ramses Feb 2015 #64
I was drunk during the entire speech and fell asleep an hour in. AngryAmish Feb 2015 #21
I want her (whom I love) to cut US a break. n/t UTUSN Feb 2015 #25
Lighten up, Francis Cal Carpenter Feb 2015 #27
Really? That's pretty short sighted, don't you think? herding cats Feb 2015 #28
Thanks, cats! elleng Feb 2015 #31
Ruth Bader Ginsburg will always have my support. herding cats Feb 2015 #38
Exactly, and thanks. elleng Feb 2015 #42
Sorry to say it, dear UTUSN, elleng Feb 2015 #29
You never loved Ginsburg. bigwillq Feb 2015 #30
You're not talking to me, but I'm not letting *this* pass. n/t UTUSN Feb 2015 #36
HooKAY, well at least *I* know when I've made my point and then exit. Nighty-night, All!1 LOVEYAn/t UTUSN Feb 2015 #32
Okie dokey (nt) bigwillq Feb 2015 #41
Don't let the door, well, you know. Thor_MN Feb 2015 #55
No one I know IRL gives a shit about this. winter is coming Feb 2015 #72
NNOOO!!1!!!! You get right back here so we can give you a damn good thrashing!! freshwest Feb 2015 #76
Hell, NO. There's nothing wrong with her mind. She had a few pops, she wasn't allowed to MADem Feb 2015 #33
Sounds rather authoritarian Kalidurga Feb 2015 #34
Unrec. BTW, are you familar with Justice William O. Douglas? FSogol Feb 2015 #39
Not a good example at all. former9thward Feb 2015 #79
I'm not comparing Ginsberg to Douglas, I'm saying the court would let us know if someone was FSogol Feb 2015 #110
Certainly agree with that former9thward Feb 2015 #115
No fucking way. truebluegreen Feb 2015 #44
Never worry about what Republicans will or might say or are saying. They are always saying ugly merrily Feb 2015 #45
If we're stuck with Thomas and Scalia, they can just deal with Ginsburg. nt DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2015 #47
No. Blue_In_AK Feb 2015 #52
No, It's all about humanity and we mortals seveneyes Feb 2015 #53
Unrec Hekate Feb 2015 #57
This is not a reason for her to retire. mr_liberal Feb 2015 #59
If Justice Ginsburg were to retire tomorrow . . . markpkessinger Feb 2015 #96
I love opening DU and seeing BS TBF Feb 2015 #63
"This is not about you, my Justice GINSBURG."? Then why are you making it about her? uppityperson Feb 2015 #68
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! William769 Feb 2015 #70
I sure can't rec this one. NBachers Feb 2015 #71
She's fucking tiny. LeftyMom Feb 2015 #74
+1 davidpdx Feb 2015 #102
Thank you for your candor God Bless You and your stellar legal mind! ALBliberal Feb 2015 #78
O puleeze no abelenkpe Feb 2015 #80
She'll step aside when she's damn well ready. lovemydog Feb 2015 #87
She should have left a year and a half ago when we still had the Senate. Purveyor Feb 2015 #88
Sad I is! They is no more un-rec! nilram Feb 2015 #92
You could not be really more wrong. dballance Feb 2015 #93
Grayson blames shutdown on GOP literally drinking on the job RandiFan1290 Feb 2015 #98
I'm puzzled by the CAPS used in typing her last name, so here are others falling asleep while Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #99
I don't recollect anyone asking you. 99Forever Feb 2015 #100
We need Ginsburg on SCOTUS far more than we need threads like this at DU. Paladin Feb 2015 #101
That's true, too. prayin4rain Feb 2015 #111
Ginsberg was poking fun at herself for falling asleep during the SOU davidpdx Feb 2015 #103
Would you be so kind as to explain your choice to use all caps when typing Ginsburg? Bluenorthwest Feb 2015 #107
I thought that pipi_k Feb 2015 #112
let's let her voting record drive our position on her tenure DrDan Feb 2015 #109
Obama should choose her replacement. n/t lumberjack_jeff Feb 2015 #113
Now that today is another day, it's time to proceed to other things. Ending this. Full OP here: UTUSN Feb 2015 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #76