Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Funny how the George Zimmerman defenders--here, there and everywhere have stopped defending him. [View all]randys1
(16,286 posts)41. Did they need a unanimous decision to convict?
and do you REALLY believe she is the ONLY one who had that attitude
please tell me you understand that is bullshit
Why are you arguing with people in this thread?
i thought all liberals were in agreement that Zimmy boy was wrong from the first action he took till his last, that he murdered that kid after hunting him...
that is what I thought
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
246 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Funny how the George Zimmerman defenders--here, there and everywhere have stopped defending him. [View all]
trumad
Jan 2015
OP
There was no reasonable doubt, the asshole admitted to following and killing Trayvon Martin
Bjorn Against
Jan 2015
#14
No you go peddle your nonsense elsewhere, this is Democratic Underground not Gun Love Underground
Bjorn Against
Jan 2015
#21
The defense attorneys may try to smear the victim but the victim's rights still need to be respected
Bjorn Against
Jan 2015
#23
My post has nothing to do with my position on firearms, that's irrelevent to this
GGJohn
Jan 2015
#26
The jury referred to him as "georgie boy" as I recall...there was no doubt, you are right
randys1
Jan 2015
#34
In our system, yes, it has to be a unanimous decision in a criminal trial to convict.
GGJohn
Jan 2015
#43
I said i thought all liberals agreed on this, you said you thought liberals were not like cons
randys1
Jan 2015
#50
First, I agreed that DA purposely fucked up the case, the racist DA and justice system
randys1
Jan 2015
#53
Ahh yes, it is a liberal who AGGRESSIVELY pushes liberal positions who are the problem at DU
randys1
Jan 2015
#85
Not mine, the VAST majority of posters here who agree that Zimmerman hunted and killed
randys1
Jan 2015
#90
OBAMA faces relentless racism and hate, all day, everyday, from up to ONE HUNDRED MILLION
randys1
Jan 2015
#37
Yes, Obama has to defend the indefensible otherwise the one hundred million rabid racist
randys1
Jan 2015
#46
So if he had not chosen to make that statement, a "race war" would have ensued?
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#65
Ah, someone mentioned "reasonable doubt", exactly like President Obama did (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#75
I don't care one way or another. I was just citing something I saw I took to be an example
Katashi_itto
Jan 2015
#80
I have said Mark Furhman arguably introduced reasonable doubt into the OJ Simpson case
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#98
I defended Zimmerman to the extent that people were howling MURDER before the facts were known
Dreamer Tatum
Jan 2015
#224
At this point, the average American has a better chance of being assaulted by GZ than winning the
PeaceNikki
Jan 2015
#10
Why would you think that people who agreed with the jury would defend him on unrelated charges
Taitertots
Jan 2015
#12
There is no reason we should see things from the perspective of racist murder defenders
Bjorn Against
Jan 2015
#16
Do you mind providing a link to an actual post there that you see as "defending Zimmy"?
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#29
I'm surprised you missed this post of someone point defending and justifying the Zimpigs shooting
JustAnotherGen
Jan 2015
#203
I might have seen that thread but missed the post that you spotted in the 250+ responses.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#220
OK, PM me the link and I will post it myself. So you have no risk of getting a hide (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#87
Nobody ever got a post hidden for linking to a low-post count troll who got banned.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#208
You mean other than the ones you can see everywhere...weird how you can say you are not
randys1
Jan 2015
#39
Anyone who defended him at ANY point is a defender of a murderer and i wont say more
randys1
Jan 2015
#40
Defending Zimm and suggesting the state didn't prove their case are two different things
davidn3600
Jan 2015
#51
So, H2O Man, why don't you point out who here is defending Zimmerman the person.
GGJohn
Jan 2015
#136
You only have 1 hidden post in the past 90 days. 4 hides to go before you are suspended.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#161
Right, it's my opinion that the jury got it right because the prosecution screwed up
GGJohn
Jan 2015
#245
Many in this thread have pointed this out, and asked the OP for a link to any post, anywhere on DU,
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#159
But like everyone else who claims this, you can't provide a single link as an example, can you?
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#163
The first post you linked to said that Zimmerman's rescue "may have been staged",
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#190
This thread illustrates that many of his defenders' new line is "who ever defend him?"
LanternWaste
Jan 2015
#178
Actually a reasonable question, as nobody is able to produce a link to a "Zimmerman defending" post.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#192
Bless your little heart. Of course you can't remember any posts defending Zimmerman.
LanternWaste
Jan 2015
#194
(Lanternwaste does quick DU Google search and is unable to find "Zimmy-defending post")
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#195
Except that neither the OP nor you can cite a single post in this thread that "defends Zimmerman".
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#191
Someone upthread finally provided a link to the kind of post Trumad has in mind.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#215
I don't know. The fools in my neighborhood and in my own family defend him.
ScreamingMeemie
Jan 2015
#184
Actually someone upthread provided a link to a DU post that arguably defended Zimmerman.
Nye Bevan
Jan 2015
#214