General Discussion

Kurska

(5,739 posts)

4. WHY CAN'T I RECOMMENDED POSTS. EOM

Reply to Ykcutnek (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 8, 2015, 04:06 PM

Jan 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If your response to terror is "Yeah that was awful, but here is a hundred reason why the victims [View all] Kurska Jan 2015 OP

Who is saying that? uppityperson Jan 2015 #1

Here let me just call out individual duers calling them jerks here I gooooo Kurska Jan 2015 #3

sorry, not meant to trick you. I haven't read this, except by a troll or 2 and thank you MIRT uppityperson Jan 2015 #8

Here is an example: Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #26

100% correct Roy Rolling Jan 2015 #40

I don't know why it's so difficult for people to just say: Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #2

WHY CAN'T I RECOMMENDED POSTS. EOM Kurska Jan 2015 #4

Go right ahead. Ykcutnek Jan 2015 #5

Thank you you're awesome Kurska Jan 2015 #6

I couldn't agree with you more. Boomerproud Jan 2015 #7

SPOT ON!!! calimary Jan 2015 #37

It's like saying "yeah, it's horrible that she was raped, but her skirt WAS very short" (nt) Nye Bevan Jan 2015 #9

Victim blaming suddenly becomes acceptable on DU Kurska Jan 2015 #10

Who has said that? n/t nichomachus Jan 2015 #19

no one Doctor_J Jan 2015 #25

I think there's a distinct difference between saying "it's like..." and "they've said.." LanternWaste Jan 2015 #32

Plenty of that going on right now in the Relgion Group. cleanhippie Jan 2015 #11

I view it as at least 2 separate issues: ecstatic Jan 2015 #12

The satire of Charlie Hebdo is not hate speech. Sorry but its not nt riderinthestorm Jan 2015 #15

I didn't say it was ecstatic Jan 2015 #17

Are you saying ALL Muslims consider it hate speech? I mean I guess that could be true the same randys1 Jan 2015 #51

Well they aren't separate when they are being discussed together, are they? Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #21

I haven't seen that phrasing but if someone has ecstatic Jan 2015 #27

I think it's just the opposite. yardwork Jan 2015 #22

I don't understand the 'freedom of speech vs. hate speech' part. In the US at least, it is not kelly1mm Jan 2015 #24

I agree. nt ecstatic Jan 2015 #30

Then I supose I am confused. What legitimate discussion is to be had involving 'hate speech vs. kelly1mm Jan 2015 #33

I shouldn't have said "vs." ecstatic Jan 2015 #36

Ok - thanks for the clarification. I think I was hung up on the 'vs.' too. Thanks again! nt kelly1mm Jan 2015 #38

Do you justify the murders of thousands of innocents in our oil wars? n/t whatchamacallit Jan 2015 #13

I never supported the Iraq war EOM Kurska Jan 2015 #14

Your post does not make sense to me. pennylane100 Jan 2015 #16

That's not what the OP is saying... Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #18

Oops, totally misread post. pennylane100 Jan 2015 #29

anyone who thinks CARTOONS justify murder Skittles Jan 2015 #20

It's not directed at anyone in particular because no one here said that Cal Carpenter Jan 2015 #23

Great post. nt Union Scribe Jan 2015 #31

See my post 26. Warren Stupidity Jan 2015 #35

I'm glad you're willing to take the time to do that. Pacifist Patriot Jan 2015 #46

The Internet Armed Camp Syndrome. No nuances or deviation allowed, pick a side and fire away. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #42

...and exhausting. nt grasswire Jan 2015 #45

Nope, people here said that. jeff47 Jan 2015 #53

Talking to those who committed the murders is the best route to go... 1bigdude Jan 2015 #28

In every case in which Muslim terrorists have been asked about their motivations, Maedhros Jan 2015 #43

If someone drew anti-Semitic cartoons or caricatures of black people CJCRANE Jan 2015 #34

Read Juan Cole . . FairWinds Jan 2015 #39

Freedom dead_head Jan 2015 #41

Giving this a rec! Victim Blaming is NOT cool (nt) LostOne4Ever Jan 2015 #44

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2015 #47

Reminds me of this cartoon. AtheistCrusader Jan 2015 #48

Criticizing The Wizard Jan 2015 #49

Any time someone adds "but" to a sentence RoccoR5955 Jan 2015 #50

Not always, but often. Donald Ian Rankin Jan 2015 #52