Hillary: how inevitable?

[cascadiance]

141. It's believed on by the FACT that most of our media is owned by a handful of corporations!

And many other things, that if you really do believe in what most Democrats and other progressives like Thom Hartmann are saying, that the media is biased in a CORPORATE direction, and not a "liberal" direction the way the REPUBLICANS keep trying to tell us. You aren't trying to tell us that the mainstream media isn't owned and the message largely friendly towards corporate interests are you? You don't believe in such Republican beliefs do you?

I take that FACT (which in my book is evidence), and the FACTS that Hillary Clinton is more in favor of the corporate stances on issues such as:
1) H-1B Visas
2) TPP, NAFTA and other so-called "free trade" agreements
3) in more support of military action to solve problems (that our corporate military industrial complex loves)
4) has a corporate friendly job in being a board member of WalMart.

I think I mentioned this EVIDENCE that you ignored in a previous post here in this thread. I won't repeat it again!

I think I have plenty of support listed here to justify that *belief* of mine. Can I prove that they are intentionally favoring Clinton in their coverage in a court of law? No. But I have plenty of supporting facts to support my beliefs along with the constant coverages in both 2008 and now trying to anoint Hillary Clinton as the already nominated candidate of the Democrats, that some seem to want to have bypass the democratic process that they find inconvenient for themselves.