Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
18. Certainly you should take her past in view, but what is of main importance is to look
Tue Jul 15, 2014, 09:38 AM
Jul 2014

at what she has done the past 5 years, and what she stands for today. She has been
a Democrat for 20 years. Her record is open for all to see.

Natalie Tennant is in West Virginia - she might well be the best you can get there el_bryanto Jul 2014 #1
That's not the usual line treestar Jul 2014 #35
Note - I don't have Warren for Pres in my sig line JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #2
Somewhere along the line we are going to have to learn to get Democrats elected Thinkingabout Jul 2014 #3
Elizabeth Warren was a freaking Republican during the Reagan era of death Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #4
FDR was originally a Republican Larkspur Jul 2014 #8
That's cute. Don't want to talk about the 1980s so you bring up the 1930's!!!!! Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #24
THIS is 2014 NOT 1980!!!! awake Jul 2014 #28
I have a hard time JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #10
You forgot Omaha Steve Jul 2014 #16
How does a Pro Choice person vote for Anti Choice candidates? For Reagan? Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #20
Seems she has changed her position Omaha Steve Jul 2014 #23
I was too young to vote against Reagan and Ford, but I worked for Carter Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #31
Well Rmon$y changed on choice several times Omaha Steve Jul 2014 #41
Certainly you should take her past in view, but what is of main importance is to look Cal33 Jul 2014 #18
If she was so open, we'd not be needing this discussion at all. Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #21
i feel Warren's progressive cred is probably highly overrated m-lekktor Jul 2014 #19
Sometimes I think "progressivism" is confused with "populism" here frazzled Jul 2014 #22
So, a vote for Hillary in the 2008 primaries was a vote for wholesale slaughter? MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #32
FFS treestar Jul 2014 #36
Still puts her ahead of many Democrats today. Orsino Jul 2014 #40
I have a hard time believing anyone with a net worth of $15,000,000 who keeps increasing it Lee-Lee Jul 2014 #5
So the D party should exclude wealthy candidates? Omaha Steve Jul 2014 #6
The Party can do whatever it wants. Ideally in the primaries we will choose the right candidates Lee-Lee Jul 2014 #11
Warren was a Republican during Reagan and Bush 41, when they were viciously anti gay Bluenorthwest Jul 2014 #14
No JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #27
I just googled that JustAnotherGen Jul 2014 #9
It's a mixed bag Lee-Lee Jul 2014 #17
That comes with the territory of being talented enough treestar Jul 2014 #37
NOPE impossible....Warren is not under teh bus dammit!!!!! uponit7771 Jul 2014 #7
Hell no, Elizabeth is drivin the damn bus and it's pullin out of the station . . . all aboard! InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2014 #12
Here we go again... TreasonousBastard Jul 2014 #13
Well, at least she HAS progressive principles to potentially sell out on. CBGLuthier Jul 2014 #15
No. Because politics is and should be about more than entrenched ideologues. conservaphobe Jul 2014 #25
Numerous times DUers make a list of progressive Eleanors38 Jul 2014 #26
Tough crowd. MannyGoldstein Jul 2014 #29
I'll vote for Warren, Hillary or Bernie if one of them is nominated gwheezie Jul 2014 #30
And she is fundraising treestar Jul 2014 #33
I think it's fair to say that the Democratic candidate in 2016 will be an enormously wealthy person Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #34
Warren is a politician. randome Jul 2014 #38
Joining a party means selling out. Orsino Jul 2014 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Elizabeth Warren selling ...»Reply #18