General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: why I suspect reaction to Hobby Lobby is somewhat hair-on-fire [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)is NOT a turning point in American jurisprudence and therefore in American history?
This much of an infringement on women's constitutional right to reproductive freedom,n even to the degree of contraception should NOT really be that important to women?
Opening the door to the pre-Griswold era, when choice often meant choosing among unwanted teen (even pre-teen) pregnancy that could easily ruin a young girl's life, a wire hanger and a back alley abortion, either of which could easily end a young girl's life? Not really a big deal for women?
Because....Obama.
Let me guess, Enrique. You're not a woman. Still, though, is your blind loyalty to Obama, who will not even be up for election ever again--or whatever actually motivated you to start this ugly thread--really that literal? Are you literally that blind to reality, history, women's rights, etc.?
I criticize Obama often, way too often for many here.
Here I am, though, yesterday, criticizing the disgusting Holly Hobby decision without a mention of Obama's exceptions.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025175902
To the contrary, the poster who DID mention them was supporting the decision (for whatever bizarre reason) and I simply distinguished those exceptions.
With all due respect, Enrique, everything is NOT about Obama. I highly recommend that, for the sake of your own credibility, you delete the OP, which will shut down this disgusting thread.
If it were about any set of rights other that women's reproductive rights, it woudl be shut down anyway, as it should be.