General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ‘Bullsh*t!’ Greenwald and Iraq Vet Blow Up on Real Time over Snowden Leaks [View all]ancianita
(36,420 posts)Last edited Mon Jun 23, 2014, 09:04 AM - Edit history (1)
long enough to have good reasons not to. Your "pertinent" questions are a substitute for reading the sources themselves for the answers. "People like me" tell you to read more widely but you're simply too closed minded to bother.
You act as if one moment of not answering an interviewer is The Single Exception disproof that science disproves some hypothesis with. You show no patterns of credibility flaws in any of the documents that they've published, regardless of how they deal with 'gotcha' interviews by mediocre hacks.
Still, you'd have to cite the instances where either Snowden or Greenwald were speechless. You'll have to go a long way to show that the documents published are a sucker's trick play, regardless of the messenger attacks on these threads.
Luxuriate in your authoritarian bubble.
Edit: Second paragraph for clarity! (ugh)