Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Uncle Joe

(58,830 posts)
71. I've never been much of a surfer either, once off
Thu Jun 12, 2014, 05:06 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Fri Jun 13, 2014, 07:32 PM - Edit history (1)

Waikiki Beach and they had minor waves, I went under the water, my board flew in to the air and just as I came back to the surface, the board came down and hit my head, I saw stars and had to fight to keep from blacking out.




Life is good every day does bring new wonders, peace to you, hunter.
thinking as an engineer, not a theoretical physicist, unblock Jun 2014 #1
Deflector shields Motown_Johnny Jun 2014 #2
More on deflector shields LongTomH Jun 2014 #57
Well from the looks of it, the bubble could push such particles out of the way. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #3
But how do you maintain an atmosphere within it Aerows Jun 2014 #17
I don't know, Aerows but I believe we are capable of finding out. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #20
The near-but-not-complete vacuum was my first thought, too Aerows Jun 2014 #16
Your post just caused me to spend a good 30 minutes debating the logic of causality. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #35
well that's 30 minutes you'll never get back... orrrrrr isss itttt...? unblock Jun 2014 #38
Perhaps we can return before we are born... Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #43
i will tell you all but first please deposit another dollar fifty ;) unblock Jun 2014 #45
I'm not a mathematician but if 0 can be both real and imaginary? Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #47
If the ship had a significant velocity through space, yes. Orsino Jun 2014 #76
You would enjoy his presentation The Traveler Jun 2014 #79
I don't think that would be an issue because space is warped around the craft. Hosnon Jun 2014 #82
so, it moves like a double-sided zipper? unblock Jun 2014 #84
This thread needs a theme song. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #4
That's nice, but where are the torpedo ports? No laser array or weapons? Rex Jun 2014 #5
I imagine that will come later. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #7
It would be a shame if another species blew our trillion dollar ship Rex Jun 2014 #8
The Tea Party would be the last to go, they don't believe in science. n/t Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #11
They would, for a brief moment, after being thrown out of an airlock. Rex Jun 2014 #12
Bad Rex, bad! Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #14
Thanks! I guess it should be nicer to them now that one of their own kicked Cantor to the curve. Rex Jun 2014 #27
... Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #30
Peace to you too Uncle Joe. Rex Jun 2014 #34
nonsense, science is way useful for increasing productivity, profits, and layoffs. unblock Jun 2014 #39
Are you familiar with Slavoj Zizek? Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #46
no, i'll have to look him up, thanks! unblock Jun 2014 #49
Forget the torpedo ports! What about friggin bathrooms? edbermac Jun 2014 #41
That is because they use cloaked, teleporter potties Rex Jun 2014 #42
Forget the bathrooms! Give us the holodeck! Orsino Jun 2014 #78
Is one of the scientists name Zefram Cochran? warrior1 Jun 2014 #6
No, he won't be along until later. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #9
Let us hope that this Enterprise has restrooms. Kaleva Jun 2014 #10
That's partially covered. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #13
Hey didn't Wolowitz on The Big Bang Theory invent a space toilet? Marrah_G Jun 2014 #31
Yes he did. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #33
Ah fellow nerd!!!! nadinbrzezinski Jun 2014 #32
What for? Zorra Jun 2014 #15
That looks like a good movie, Zorra, and I plan on viewing it but to answer your question Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #19
If the only ones who will get to go live on "Elysium" are those with the most wealth, the universe Zorra Jun 2014 #24
The scenario of "Elysium" is only one of an infinite number of potentialities. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #26
Carl Sagan did want us to spread out into the Galaxy LongTomH Jun 2014 #51
i just read this article about recent leaps in the development of transporters too Takket Jun 2014 #18
How soon can I sign up for my... 3catwoman3 Jun 2014 #21
Simply not possible; but sure is fun to talk about. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #22
Impossible Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #23
''Space travel is utter bilge.'' Octafish Jun 2014 #25
Well, as I said earlier in the thread Aerows Jun 2014 #28
I hear you, Octafish, if not us someone else will. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #29
There is a difference between deductive validity and inductive strength. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #36
I hear what you're saying Gravitycollapse but does the definition of proper change? Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #40
Certain aspects of FTL speed preclude them from possibility given our system of logic. Gravitycollapse Jun 2014 #44
I view our current space travel capability and knowledge as toddlers Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #48
Nice slapdash inclusion of Fermat's Last Theorem, which is TRUE mathematic Jun 2014 #59
The best analogy might be antimatter and the Higgs boson LongTomH Jun 2014 #85
Speaking of robots, how far along do you believe this will be in a 100 years? Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #86
100 years? How about 10-20? LongTomH Jun 2014 #87
I'm thinking that in 100-300 years, if they can pull something like this FTL thing off Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #88
I agree, not in this universe. By my math nothing goes faster than light... hunter Jun 2014 #50
Good analysis. But are you sure of your existence in the universe when there's no one observing your presence? Just askin, lol. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #55
Like Dr. Who, I'm a very dangerous fellow when I don't know what I'm doing. hunter Jun 2014 #60
Well that sounded familiar... X is impossible. TampaAnimusVortex Jun 2014 #58
Turning lead into gold with potions and spells is impossible. hunter Jun 2014 #62
You believe what you want. I'll go with the experts. TampaAnimusVortex Jun 2014 #64
I'm merely optimistic in a different way. hunter Jun 2014 #70
Bad example. Orsino Jun 2014 #77
I thought it was a good analogy. hunter Jun 2014 #80
Yes, but today lead can be turned in to gold. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #65
Right... hunter Jun 2014 #67
And gold can be turned even easier in to lead, but it's not just limited to those two elements, the Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #68
That still doesn't make a Star Trek FTL warp drive possible. hunter Jun 2014 #69
I've never been much of a surfer either, once off Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #71
Well, the Alcubierre drive doesn't work that way... so it is possible ReverendDeuce Jun 2014 #66
Your math may not be right, at least in this case. Our current understanding of cosmology doesn't Warren DeMontague Jun 2014 #72
I do not choose that universe. hunter Jun 2014 #73
I agree that it is big, however i choose to live in a reality where objective truths can be gleaned Warren DeMontague Jun 2014 #74
I choose to live in that same reality. hunter Jun 2014 #75
You may be right. Warren DeMontague Jun 2014 #83
This isn't about traveling faster than light, which everyone agrees can't be done. Hosnon Jun 2014 #81
Agreed Ratty Jun 2014 #54
Would require infinite mass, which would blow a major hole in the budget. Hahaha! InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #56
According to the article, they believe, mass the size of a car might work. Uncle Joe Jun 2014 #63
Awesome that the target year is 2112! I knew that Rush album was prescient. kysrsoze Jun 2014 #37
Can you imagine if we were a world where the main purpose in life is to ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2014 #52
There's a better write-up at Io9 LongTomH Jun 2014 #53
Bookmarking... berni_mccoy Jun 2014 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Engage warp drive! Nasa r...»Reply #71