Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Do you think it was realistic for Obama to prosecute Bush? [View all]
This would have been the first time in history that a President would have prosecuted a previous President.
Would this have been realistic?
23 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
11 (48%) |
|
No | |
12 (52%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It would have guaranteed Democratic Supremacy through the next century, and earned him, and America,
Zorra
Jun 2014
#1
It might have been a good symbolic gesture; but it would have accomplished nothing practical
el_bryanto
Jun 2014
#2
If investigations had began, that demand likely would have organically evolved.
morningfog
Jun 2014
#19
We have a corporate crap media, but we also have politicians who had NO appetite to talk
Jefferson23
Jun 2014
#20
Exactly. There was (and still is) more than enough crimes by someone to look into.
morningfog
Jun 2014
#18
I don't think deciding whom to prosecute is one of the president's roles (nt)
Nye Bevan
Jun 2014
#35
He should've had the Justice Department indict Bush and all in the White House associated with PNAC.
Efilroft Sul
Jun 2014
#40