Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
22. I think most nonviolent type people would be reluctant to shoot either one
Sun Apr 1, 2012, 12:39 PM
Apr 2012

When I imagine myself in any sort of situation, my thought is to keep a safe enough distance that they can't grab for my gun and hold it ready to shoot while calling for help.

That may mean not having a gun trained on an individual but between 2, and ready to aim and shoot. Only if you see one is holding a gun do you aim at that one and shout DROP IT OR I'LL SHOOT.

Otherwise, shout "STOP OR I'LL SHOOT" and everybody is likely to turn to see where/who it came from. In that moment, you've broken the concentration of the aggressor.

You don't *have* to figure out who is the aggressor, who is calling for help. You just need to freeze the action in place, persuade *both* of them to LIE FACE DOWN ARMS STRETCHED OVER YOUR HEADS NOW!!! and DO NOT MOVE OR I WILL SHOOT. And then keep them in that position, unable to reach for any weapons, until the police arrive.

(the reason I go around imagining myself in such a situation is I'm a single woman living alone in a rural area where it could take the police quite a few minutes to arrive. and in the past on various occasions I have been followed by someone in a van, office-stalked, and harassed by a registered sex offender and his gang. plus last year a neighbor held a would-be burglar who entered through a window at gunpoint until the police arrived. plus we had a pair of thieves move into the shack up the road. so getting a gun with training and possibly even license to carry concealed is *very* high on my priority list these days.)

I think her feeling stems from the helplessness of immediate response... hlthe2b Apr 2012 #1
Well stated. n/t Foolacious Apr 2012 #3
No she calls after the gun shot. The boy is already dead. vaberella Apr 2012 #6
If she meant it that way she would already have a gun lunatica Apr 2012 #10
That doesn't negate my point at all... hlthe2b Apr 2012 #15
the police can't get there in time magical thyme Apr 2012 #2
I agree with your thoughts on the 13 year old boy...who is Black. vaberella Apr 2012 #9
I think most nonviolent type people would be reluctant to shoot either one magical thyme Apr 2012 #22
I'm going to assume that she saw the police as some sort of protective source since she Arkansas Granny Apr 2012 #4
No that's not what I mean. vaberella Apr 2012 #5
It's "fight or flight" thinking, and I've had the exact same reaction EFerrari Apr 2012 #8
Pretty much the same thing I said in post #10 lunatica Apr 2012 #11
But your situation and her situation are entirely different. vaberella Apr 2012 #17
Imo, it doesn't matter what the situation is but what your brain tells you it is EFerrari Apr 2012 #19
We don't know that her first thought was if she had a gun. She mentioned that Arkansas Granny Apr 2012 #14
Valid point. The gun thing entering our minds during a stressful situation is a problem I think. vaberella Apr 2012 #18
I think you're right. EFerrari Apr 2012 #20
I would possibly enter a situation like that magical thyme Apr 2012 #23
The police certainly are NOT a protective force. They are a reactive force. slackmaster Apr 2012 #7
Excellent point lunatica Apr 2012 #12
I taught my kids to NOT trust cops. alphafemale Apr 2012 #16
I am over 40 and the police have NEVER helped when i have called them, in 7 different states slampoet Apr 2012 #24
She just feels bad Life Long Dem Apr 2012 #13
There was another woman who called 911 HockeyMom Apr 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The crying woman on the 9...»Reply #22