Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The WTF? File: New $500,000,000 U.S. Embassy in London. [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)44. We've been in the "old" embassy since 1960.
We've been in Grosvenor Square since John Adams went over that way!
We don't own the land under the building, and that's a big part of the problem. Also, the old building is kind of cramped in some regards. It really is past time to move out of the square, despite the historical associations with it--the entire area is just not very secure, even with the ugly ass blast walls and flowerpots, etc. It's way too soft a target.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3123915/US-embassy-to-move-from-Grosvenor-Square-to-industrial-estate.html
US embassy to move from Grosvenor Square to industrial estate
The American embassy is to move from its landmark London location to an industrial area south of the river in a decision driven by security concerns.
...Ambassador Robert Tuttle said security fears had played a major role in the decision to move but also the current embassy had reached its limits as an office building with a staff of 800.
...The current embassy was always an oddity in the US diplomatic set-up because of the lease arrangement with the Duke of Westminster - virtually every other major mission is owned outright by the US.
The Duke reportedly said he would only sell if the US government returned his family's land, confiscated during the American War of Independence.
The American embassy is to move from its landmark London location to an industrial area south of the river in a decision driven by security concerns.
...Ambassador Robert Tuttle said security fears had played a major role in the decision to move but also the current embassy had reached its limits as an office building with a staff of 800.
...The current embassy was always an oddity in the US diplomatic set-up because of the lease arrangement with the Duke of Westminster - virtually every other major mission is owned outright by the US.
The Duke reportedly said he would only sell if the US government returned his family's land, confiscated during the American War of Independence.
Hell, maybe this time they'll get the eagle to look the right way, if they don't take the one they have now along with them to their new home (it's considered a rather famous sculpture now, the guy who designed it was a well known artist--unknown if the reclassification of the building as a historic site means they have to leave it behind, or what) and with any luck, they'll leave behind the statue of Saint Ronnie in Grosvenor Square. Ike looks right there, but Ronnie looks like something plonked down to buy Margaret Thatcher a thrill or something.
If the idiots at Faux news don't like the idea of a black American president building a new embassy (and they don't), that's reason enough to build it, IMO.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
50 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nope. Another boondoggle for crony capitalists. Do the Brits have complaints about the old embassy?
freshwest
Mar 2012
#1
Yes, those are always an amazing nationalistic spectacle. Do they actually keep people...
freshwest
Mar 2012
#39
Hoping by your signature line you mean reducing the debt by ending war and not killing off the poor.
freshwest
Mar 2012
#22
What do you think of Ron Paul's vision for doing this since you choose to bring it up?
think
Mar 2012
#27
We are cool, and I'm impressed. Thank you for who you are, and my apologies again.
freshwest
Mar 2012
#41
Check the last, dipsy mentioned what was in it. And it shows how the money is just flying around.
freshwest
Mar 2012
#19
There's dipsy's barricades. Why not anchor a huge ship offshore. Would be more private.
freshwest
Mar 2012
#18