Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
72. yes, really
Fri May 23, 2014, 02:00 PM
May 2014

Excuse me for thinking that you said these women falsely cry rape when discovering they were pregnant... not that it matters since what I said still applies in your claim that these women falsely cry rape when discovered having sex. That's the most ridiculously thing I've ever heard not to mention entirely sexist. Just because these alleged prostitutes might be caught having sex or even having sex with multiple partners why the fuck would they falsely cry rape when there's nothing wrong with people having sex in the military? Why in the world would they falsely cry rape for having sex for money when the only difference is the financial transaction, and if it's the financial transaction that is discovered than no matter WHAT they try to claim they'd know they had been caught prostituting themselves. There is no logical REASON to falsely cry rape whether it's just consensual sex or consensual sex for money. Come on, what prostitutes falsely cries rape bringing a host of problems for themselves instead of just saying they were having perfectly legal and consensual sex? Would YOU falsely cry rape if caught having sex for money instead of doing the much easier thing and saying you were just having perfectly legal consensual sex? Of course not. The very idea that this happens anywhere but in your own head much less that it's common is lunatic as well as trying to use this asinine claim to try to refute the ACTUAL rampant problem of sexual assaults in the military. It's pure sexist bullshit

I'll even go one further that you brought up that some of these alleged prostitutes are charging $200 a pop as though it's a fortune when it's INSANELY cheap because you wish it could be you making that. Hell, $200 is still the going rate in the cheaper strip clubs to just sit on someone's lap in your underwear for a half hour in the champagne room while they have to keep their hands off the lady bits or ANY bits if that's what the stripper decides. Geez, $200 for full sex is a damned insult. GROSS.

As you indicated clearly in another post on this subject, you're alleging that there is no rampant sexual assault in our armed forces but that it's just a bunch of prostitutes falsely crying rape for no logical reason whatsoever, and that's a whopping load of BULLSHIT to try to keep the armed forces continuing to cover up rampant sexual assault on female soldiers and even when the military has finally admitted that the statistics of sexual assault of female soldiers IS rampant and HAS been attempted to be covered up by every higher up above private and that it's typical of the accusers to not only have their claims ignored but also to be retaliated against for making them. And why is it the prostitutes that only have to worry about discovery of their committing prostitution when BOTH the seller AND the buyer are involved in the prostitution EQUALLY? Because of SEXISM. You don't even mention all the rampant men BUYING the sex yet whine about these female alleged prostitutes as if they're forcing it on them. Pffffttt... were it not for the rampant amount of men in the military willing to buy sex even at #200 a pop you find so outrageous there wouldn't BE any alleged prostitution problem going on... the supply and demand bit again. What the hell do you care if there's prostitution going on anyway? It should be legal and regulated.

Since we established that the alleged problem of rampant prostitution is caused by the demand side (the male buyers) then how logical is it to want the females whether their prostitutes or not out of combat troops? Logically, it makes more sense to have the MEN out whether THEY'RE the buyers or not since it's the MEN buyers that are on the demand side and thus the cause of the alleged rampant prostitution. Me thinks your desire to have no females in combat troops is the same bigoted reason so many people wanted black people out in years past... you don't think they're "worthy".

As for the OP believing that the reason that the woman killed her children is because of a sexual assault while she was in the military that they pulled out of their butt, look up thread at my post on that subject. I SAID it was not only outrageously stupid but massively insulting to imagine that anyone who's been sexually assaulted will become a homicidal maniac.

As I said, people that are so sexist and so in denial believing despite the evidence and the military's recent admission that sexual assault against females is rampant in the military you make up sexist bullshit to try to claim that not only are these women "whores" but completely illogically crying rape when caught having sex that is the reason for the rampant claims of sexual assault and even that rather than the EVIDENCE that they're routinely retaliated against but that their claims are instantly believed. Why is it that anyone claiming they've been a victim of any crime NOT to be assumed to be truthful until evidence suggests otherwise? Just why is it that you think that women SHOULDN'T be assumed to be truthful until evidence suggests otherwise when claiming the crime of sexual assault? I know why you think sexual assault claims by women are magically "different" then any other claims of crimes against people as you've made it abundantly clear.

If you said anything else just as stupid and disgustingly sexist I'm not addressing it since there's only so much of that shit one can reasonably take, and I've hit well past my limit.

>>>CLICK<<<

... shenmue May 2014 #1
That's sort of jumping to conclusions davidn3600 May 2014 #2
Yeah, it is jumping to conclusions davidpdx May 2014 #6
What exactly in the account leads you to believe such a thing? 1000words May 2014 #3
I love internet psychiatrists! MADem May 2014 #4
Yes, reading the rest does put huge doubt into the assumption the OP made davidpdx May 2014 #7
It is a horrible story, but based on the info available, she may not have even finished MADem May 2014 #8
It's got to be devastating for the family davidpdx May 2014 #9
Sounds more like PasadenaTrudy May 2014 #18
Those are FAR more likely possibilities than flashbacks from an Army career she did not have MADem May 2014 #61
OK, Doc, so you've definitely ruled out postpartum depression? Brother Buzz May 2014 #5
In some women, postpartum depression can cause a psychotic break. Lex May 2014 #21
Andrea Yates had postpartum psychosis TexasBushwhacker May 2014 #54
+1 get the red out May 2014 #39
Those poor children Dorian Gray May 2014 #10
yeah, everyone knowns that being sexually assaulted makes one become a homicidal maniac TorchTheWitch May 2014 #11
no doubt a vicious rhetorical cycle Supersedeas May 2014 #19
2 month old baby gollygee May 2014 #12
Agreed. JNelson6563 May 2014 #30
Post removed Post removed May 2014 #13
The anti-vet bias and bigotry from the media and OP disgusts me Lee-Lee May 2014 #14
Great post Orrex May 2014 #16
Great post IronLionZion May 2014 #23
I am a Munificence May 2014 #24
Look at the photoshopped image - it adds an unrelated fetus in the womb pic to the story. blm May 2014 #49
What a horrible story. Inkfreak May 2014 #15
No doubt in your mind, eh? MineralMan May 2014 #17
Adding an unrelated fetus in the womb pic to the photoshopped image isn't responsible, either. blm May 2014 #46
I have no idea. Adding anything to this MineralMan May 2014 #50
Paging Dr. Frist!!!! nt msanthrope May 2014 #20
More like Dr. Phil. AtheistCrusader May 2014 #35
Is he still around...Oproah should be proud. Supersedeas May 2014 #65
An enlightened country would examine her for postpartum psychosis Warpy May 2014 #22
Right. H2O Man May 2014 #44
At least it's in California, not Florida or Texas. Warpy May 2014 #52
I'd also like to add Munificence May 2014 #25
I believe you CountAllVotes May 2014 #34
This problem Munificence May 2014 #37
Again, I agree w/you CountAllVotes May 2014 #38
Yes, being involved Munificence May 2014 #40
how about we get rid of the men in combat troops? TorchTheWitch May 2014 #64
Really? Munificence May 2014 #68
yes, really TorchTheWitch May 2014 #72
I am ready for another apology (or more) Munificence May 2014 #74
Again, where Munificence May 2014 #70
Sorry AnalystInParadise May 2014 #76
+1 to that. Separation May 2014 #63
Well... RobinA May 2014 #69
Yes it Munificence May 2014 #71
"no doubt in my mind she was sexually assaulted while serving" iandhr May 2014 #26
Reporters These Days wercal May 2014 #27
Probably the best way to describe someone who only makes it 3 months Lee-Lee May 2014 #28
Autocorrect, I assume. Sentence reads as if it should say 'formerly'. AtheistCrusader May 2014 #33
Yikes! H2O Man May 2014 #29
Yes, and maybe the OP could provide some proof that she WAS sexually assaulted! MoonRiver May 2014 #31
No, the OP couldn't do that, because there's no such evidence. MineralMan May 2014 #47
But, but, but he was so sure! MoonRiver May 2014 #60
My crystal ball is in the shop. Can I borrow yours? AtheistCrusader May 2014 #32
Pass it along please Supersedeas May 2014 #66
Message auto-removed Name removed May 2014 #36
You used a fetus in the womb for a photo of the child? Why? blm May 2014 #41
The photo is from Telemundo LA 951-Riverside May 2014 #42
No - the photo of the fetus in the womb is not there. Your OP uses a photo op image blm May 2014 #45
It's there look at the first link 951-Riverside May 2014 #48
Doesn't come up when clicked. The other photos do. blm May 2014 #51
They probably removed it from the page sometime after OP grabbed it. stevenleser May 2014 #56
With all the other photos, why grab that to show the 'murdered' children? blm May 2014 #57
Are you referring to the OP or Telemundo? stevenleser May 2014 #58
My money is on postpartum psychosis. Very sad. stevenleser May 2014 #43
Agree. Rhymes With Orange May 2014 #55
What a crazy assumption to make by saying she was giftedgirl77 May 2014 #53
I alerted on this OP Munificence May 2014 #59
Looks like a mostly drive-by turd in the punchbowl. AtheistCrusader May 2014 #67
And just what evidence removed any doubt that this was caused by what you say caused it? cleanhippie May 2014 #62
Besides the obvious, will you check my posting history and diagnose me? NCTraveler May 2014 #73
Or she could be a psychopath..... AnalystInParadise May 2014 #75
You don't know a FUCKING thing about this woman. What is wrong with you? kysrsoze May 2014 #77
Kick for AnalystInParadise May 2014 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Female Army Vet Accused o...»Reply #72