General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Female Army Vet Accused of Murdering Her Three Daughters, Ages 3, 2 and 2 Months [View all]TorchTheWitch
(11,065 posts)Excuse me for thinking that you said these women falsely cry rape when discovering they were pregnant... not that it matters since what I said still applies in your claim that these women falsely cry rape when discovered having sex. That's the most ridiculously thing I've ever heard not to mention entirely sexist. Just because these alleged prostitutes might be caught having sex or even having sex with multiple partners why the fuck would they falsely cry rape when there's nothing wrong with people having sex in the military? Why in the world would they falsely cry rape for having sex for money when the only difference is the financial transaction, and if it's the financial transaction that is discovered than no matter WHAT they try to claim they'd know they had been caught prostituting themselves. There is no logical REASON to falsely cry rape whether it's just consensual sex or consensual sex for money. Come on, what prostitutes falsely cries rape bringing a host of problems for themselves instead of just saying they were having perfectly legal and consensual sex? Would YOU falsely cry rape if caught having sex for money instead of doing the much easier thing and saying you were just having perfectly legal consensual sex? Of course not. The very idea that this happens anywhere but in your own head much less that it's common is lunatic as well as trying to use this asinine claim to try to refute the ACTUAL rampant problem of sexual assaults in the military. It's pure sexist bullshit
I'll even go one further that you brought up that some of these alleged prostitutes are charging $200 a pop as though it's a fortune when it's INSANELY cheap because you wish it could be you making that. Hell, $200 is still the going rate in the cheaper strip clubs to just sit on someone's lap in your underwear for a half hour in the champagne room while they have to keep their hands off the lady bits or ANY bits if that's what the stripper decides. Geez, $200 for full sex is a damned insult. GROSS.
As you indicated clearly in another post on this subject, you're alleging that there is no rampant sexual assault in our armed forces but that it's just a bunch of prostitutes falsely crying rape for no logical reason whatsoever, and that's a whopping load of BULLSHIT to try to keep the armed forces continuing to cover up rampant sexual assault on female soldiers and even when the military has finally admitted that the statistics of sexual assault of female soldiers IS rampant and HAS been attempted to be covered up by every higher up above private and that it's typical of the accusers to not only have their claims ignored but also to be retaliated against for making them. And why is it the prostitutes that only have to worry about discovery of their committing prostitution when BOTH the seller AND the buyer are involved in the prostitution EQUALLY? Because of SEXISM. You don't even mention all the rampant men BUYING the sex yet whine about these female alleged prostitutes as if they're forcing it on them. Pffffttt... were it not for the rampant amount of men in the military willing to buy sex even at #200 a pop you find so outrageous there wouldn't BE any alleged prostitution problem going on... the supply and demand bit again. What the hell do you care if there's prostitution going on anyway? It should be legal and regulated.
Since we established that the alleged problem of rampant prostitution is caused by the demand side (the male buyers) then how logical is it to want the females whether their prostitutes or not out of combat troops? Logically, it makes more sense to have the MEN out whether THEY'RE the buyers or not since it's the MEN buyers that are on the demand side and thus the cause of the alleged rampant prostitution. Me thinks your desire to have no females in combat troops is the same bigoted reason so many people wanted black people out in years past... you don't think they're "worthy".
As for the OP believing that the reason that the woman killed her children is because of a sexual assault while she was in the military that they pulled out of their butt, look up thread at my post on that subject. I SAID it was not only outrageously stupid but massively insulting to imagine that anyone who's been sexually assaulted will become a homicidal maniac.
As I said, people that are so sexist and so in denial believing despite the evidence and the military's recent admission that sexual assault against females is rampant in the military you make up sexist bullshit to try to claim that not only are these women "whores" but completely illogically crying rape when caught having sex that is the reason for the rampant claims of sexual assault and even that rather than the EVIDENCE that they're routinely retaliated against but that their claims are instantly believed. Why is it that anyone claiming they've been a victim of any crime NOT to be assumed to be truthful until evidence suggests otherwise? Just why is it that you think that women SHOULDN'T be assumed to be truthful until evidence suggests otherwise when claiming the crime of sexual assault? I know why you think sexual assault claims by women are magically "different" then any other claims of crimes against people as you've made it abundantly clear.
If you said anything else just as stupid and disgustingly sexist I'm not addressing it since there's only so much of that shit one can reasonably take, and I've hit well past my limit.
>>>CLICK<<<