Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
Tue May 20, 2014, 02:36 PM May 2014

Either, or? [View all]

Taking DU's temperature on 2016...

PS: We really should be concentrating on 2014 but the Warren/Clinton debate will rage no matter what, soooo...


12 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Hillary Clinton
1 (8%)
Elizabeth Warren
11 (92%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Either, or? [View all] ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 OP
Explain to me again why Hillary is inevitable? SheilaT May 2014 #1
You're basing your argument on what Democratic voters are indicating they want. Maedhros May 2014 #2
The vast majority of Democratic voters do not even know MineralMan May 2014 #5
How is that argument different than similar ones used in 2008 against Barack Obama? Dawgs May 2014 #6
Elizabeth Warren is no Barack Obama. MineralMan May 2014 #8
Really? You don't think EW is just as popular as Obama 2+ years before the election? Dawgs May 2014 #10
Well said customerserviceguy May 2014 #31
Not inevitable, but she's running & she can win. baldguy May 2014 #7
Neither Hillary or Warren have said they are not running in 2016. Dawgs May 2014 #12
Elizabeth Warren: ‘I’m Not Running for President’ baldguy May 2014 #22
I voted for Hillary because EW said she isn't running. Louisiana1976 May 2014 #26
I suspect among Democrats outside DU that are paying attention or who will do their research ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #13
You realize that DU does not reflect the general population, right? MineralMan May 2014 #3
Post #13 is my response. Also... ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #14
Of course not. However, if you post a poll, it MineralMan May 2014 #33
I really like both, but think all the things that happened with Kerry will happen with a Warren run. Starry Messenger May 2014 #4
So, let us get this straight. Dawgs May 2014 #9
Hey, it's an opinion. Starry Messenger May 2014 #11
"Warren isn't going to attract that." Doh! EVERYONE... ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #16
I am being specific about *Wall Street funding* Starry Messenger May 2014 #20
Yes, that thing is on but it's not helping your anti-Warren case! Obama also had to have millions ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #21
I'm not anti-Warren, I adore her. Starry Messenger May 2014 #23
Warren would have to demonstrate electability on a national scale. geek tragedy May 2014 #15
The fact that every time she is interviewed by a journalist or she speaks to private ChisolmTrailDem May 2014 #17
Hillary came close to beating Obama in 2008, and probably geek tragedy May 2014 #19
She'd be running against Hillary in a climate where income inequality is a big issue. n/t winter is coming May 2014 #30
2014 midterms BainsBane May 2014 #18
I'm a Hillary supporter but I welcome Warren, and anyone else, to run in the primaries. Nye Bevan May 2014 #24
so what is Sanders? not worth including? nt arely staircase May 2014 #25
+1 joshcryer May 2014 #27
Not a Democrat. Erich Bloodaxe BSN May 2014 #28
But unlike Warren, Sanders has actually expressed interest in running in the Dem. Primary arely staircase May 2014 #29
No dynasty candidate will ever get my vote. EVER. 99Forever May 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Either, or?