General Discussion

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

71. Why do you hate science?

Tue May 13, 2014, 12:11 PM

May 2014

You seem to think it's all over. That is as anti-science stance as a climate denier.

The condoning and attempt to whitewash the pollution from Fukushima is being a nuclear apologist.

The science isn't in and you are already deciding what has happened. And you fight and cry about any science being undertaken.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

125 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fukushima is an ongoing problem [View all] RobertEarl May 2014 OP

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution says: Quote: RobertEarl May 2014 #1

PROTIP: The welcome page on a website doesn't count as evidence. NuclearDem May 2014 #2

It's called further reading for those that are interested Jesus Malverde May 2014 #4

And further reading shows that the radiation levels on the West Coast NuclearDem May 2014 #5

The welcome page doesn't count? RobertEarl May 2014 #66

Oh, Robert. NuclearDem May 2014 #69

Why do you hate science? RobertEarl May 2014 #71

I don't hate science. I hate your strawmen and failure to grasp basic concepts. NuclearDem May 2014 #77

My claims use the scientific method RobertEarl May 2014 #78

Except for the part about falsification. NuclearDem May 2014 #81

You are wrong RobertEarl May 2014 #82

Oh this is fun! NuclearDem May 2014 #86

Your idea of fun, eh? RobertEarl May 2014 #88

Oh dear God! NuclearDem May 2014 #90

There you go again RobertEarl May 2014 #94

Careful! That carp might have Fukuplutonium in it! NuclearDem May 2014 #99

See, that's how you are RobertEarl May 2014 #101

In a while they'll be spinning the consequences malaise May 2014 #7

They may spin it RobertEarl May 2014 #67

I'm not sure how to stem it Aerows May 2014 #3

Being aware is important RobertEarl May 2014 #8

Do you live in the Fukushima prefecture? Gravitycollapse May 2014 #14

No, I don't live there RobertEarl May 2014 #35

have you washed the exterior of your house with a combination of bleach and ammonia yet? snooper2 May 2014 #73

Right I washed down the trees too RobertEarl May 2014 #74

No, the chlorine gas produced neutralizes any radioactivity, you should know this snooper2 May 2014 #76

You post false info, again? RobertEarl May 2014 #79

So what do you do to protect your home and family from chemtrails? snooper2 May 2014 #80

Doubling down on the absurdity? RobertEarl May 2014 #83

dude, you just stated that you have radiation all over your home and wildlife and bugs, what are YOU snooper2 May 2014 #84

Denial runs deep eh? RobertEarl May 2014 #85

Did WHOI say the fallout from Fukushima made it all the way to NC? maddezmom May 2014 #87

My gawd RobertEarl May 2014 #89

I don't trust ENEnews.com maddezmom May 2014 #91

You've not read it then RobertEarl May 2014 #92

Hmmmm, rather biased sources IMO maddezmom May 2014 #93

Tell ya what RobertEarl May 2014 #96

Nah, people have given you links in all your threads but call them deniers, enablers maddezmom May 2014 #97

Nah? That's it? Just Nah? RobertEarl May 2014 #98

K&R DeSwiss May 2014 #6

End times MoonRiver May 2014 #9

"Relax! They're just venting a little steam." bvar22 May 2014 #10

and heavy water is wet. corkhead May 2014 #11

I bet the nuclear industry is spending more money JEB May 2014 #12

There is no telling how much $ RobertEarl May 2014 #100

"...its impacts are increasing daily." - That is a factually incorrect statement. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #13

Oh? RobertEarl May 2014 #15

News would imply it hasn't been known already. Just because you don't know doesn't make it news... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #16

Nice personal attack RobertEarl May 2014 #17

"So you admit that the pollution is ongoing. It has not stopped." - I never said it had stopped. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #18

There you go again RobertEarl May 2014 #19

You realize that "ongoing" and "increasing" are not the same, right? You have to. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #21

Nice try RobertEarl May 2014 #23

You've already been told that's from tectonic and volcanic activity. NuclearDem May 2014 #25

Except it was demonstrated in your own thread the anomalous increases happened 2 years before... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #26

So your claim is RobertEarl May 2014 #27

I assume satellite thermal imaging is quite good now... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #40

That's correct FBaggins May 2014 #104

Heh RobertEarl May 2014 #105

You're just making yourself foolish FBaggins May 2014 #106

You just doubled down!! RobertEarl May 2014 #107

Doubled? Heck... it's at least triple or quadruple at this point. FBaggins May 2014 #109

You make it sound so cool, FB RobertEarl May 2014 #111

"Good gawd man, do you even read what you write? " FBaggins May 2014 #120

3 or 4 garden hoses? Bwhahaha RobertEarl May 2014 #122

Three or four could handle it easily... probably fewer than that. FBaggins May 2014 #125

And RobertEarl May 2014 #20

"Nuclear is more dirty and less safe than renewables." - Myself circa April 27th Gravitycollapse May 2014 #22

So what is your plan for the waste? RobertEarl May 2014 #29

We should use deep bore holes or deep geological repositories for our current waste. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #31

We tried that: deep holes RobertEarl May 2014 #34

DU thread about WIPP RobertEarl May 2014 #36

I'm well aware of the fire and investigation. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #37

Yep RobertEarl May 2014 #39

The other option was to use fossil fuel powered plants... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #41

15 percent of elec is nukes RobertEarl May 2014 #43

I have already shown you your smear against me is false... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #48

Speaking of slander. NuclearDem May 2014 #24

Calling someone pro-nuke is slander? RobertEarl May 2014 #102

I'm not even sure you know what "pro-nuke" means. NuclearDem May 2014 #103

Ok. Here's the thing RobertEarl May 2014 #108

Alright, point by point. NuclearDem May 2014 #110

There you go again RobertEarl May 2014 #112

Well, let it never be said I didn't try to help. NuclearDem May 2014 #113

Help? RobertEarl May 2014 #114

You've brought almost all of it on yourself. NuclearDem May 2014 #115

Nothing has happened to me, NuclearDem RobertEarl May 2014 #116

"Except for getting dosed from Fukushima" zappaman May 2014 #121

And How Do You, Or Anyone Else, Know That The Posted Studies Are Legitimate - Trust In Authority? cantbeserious May 2014 #30

They're peer reviewed studies. Gravitycollapse May 2014 #32

Peer-Reviewed - Easily Manipulated By Authorities - Only Publish Atomic Industry Friendly Articles cantbeserious May 2014 #33

So you just dismiss the entire institution of statistical investigation... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #38

I Dismiss Blind Trust Placed In Online Articles When TPTB Can So Easily Corrupt Any Process Or Person cantbeserious May 2014 #47

So your argument essentially amounts to an irrational fear of the internet... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #49

No Fear Of Internet - Only Great Concern For The Faith Some Place In Posted Studies And Articles cantbeserious May 2014 #50

So you are saying we cannot trust the websites for academic journals... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #51

The Universities Are Not Free From Outside Influence cantbeserious May 2014 #53

Are you saying that because the chance of corruption exists it must be happening? Gravitycollapse May 2014 #57

No one really needs to personally attack you ..... oldhippie May 2014 #45

You? Again? RobertEarl May 2014 #46

lol! darkangel218 May 2014 #54

Yes WillyT May 2014 #28

It's both depressing and amusing that people are still alarmed over this non-issue JJChambers May 2014 #42

No. It is wise thinking RobertEarl May 2014 #44

Fukushima is a non issue?? darkangel218 May 2014 #52

It was an issue; it's been handled and is under control JJChambers May 2014 #55

Fukushima is FAR from being under control. darkangel218 May 2014 #56

I see RobertEarl isn't alone. You two may continue JJChambers May 2014 #58

Have a nice evening. darkangel218 May 2014 #59

I'm having a nice evening, as are the folks who live on the west coast JJChambers May 2014 #60

Say... you a pro-nuke person? RobertEarl May 2014 #61

Here is some science for you JJ RobertEarl May 2014 #62

We've been over that Amchitka study Robert. NuclearDem May 2014 #63

Here ya go, read up RobertEarl May 2014 #64

Hahahahaha zappaman May 2014 #65

Nothing but ENENews links. NuclearDem May 2014 #68

that was obvious a long time ago. hobbit709 May 2014 #70

I get a lot of that RobertEarl May 2014 #75

Oh, that happened quite some time ago. zappaman May 2014 #95

No it isnt. Radiation is good for you. Stop fear mongering. Yaaaay! 951-Riverside May 2014 #72

Fukushima is but one symptom of the more obvious problems we suffer under. DeSwiss May 2014 #117

I get that people have fear RobertEarl May 2014 #118

Gratias, Amatorem Veritatis. DeSwiss May 2014 #119

You wouldn't think it from the lack of science. Octafish May 2014 #123

That is a good point RobertEarl May 2014 #124