Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Fukushima is an ongoing problem [View all]NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)68. Nothing but ENENews links.
You've officially jumped the shark, Robert.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
125 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't hate science. I hate your strawmen and failure to grasp basic concepts.
NuclearDem
May 2014
#77
have you washed the exterior of your house with a combination of bleach and ammonia yet?
snooper2
May 2014
#73
No, the chlorine gas produced neutralizes any radioactivity, you should know this
snooper2
May 2014
#76
dude, you just stated that you have radiation all over your home and wildlife and bugs, what are YOU
snooper2
May 2014
#84
Nah, people have given you links in all your threads but call them deniers, enablers
maddezmom
May 2014
#97
"...its impacts are increasing daily." - That is a factually incorrect statement.
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#13
News would imply it hasn't been known already. Just because you don't know doesn't make it news...
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#16
"So you admit that the pollution is ongoing. It has not stopped." - I never said it had stopped.
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#18
You realize that "ongoing" and "increasing" are not the same, right? You have to.
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#21
Except it was demonstrated in your own thread the anomalous increases happened 2 years before...
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#26
"Nuclear is more dirty and less safe than renewables." - Myself circa April 27th
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#22
We should use deep bore holes or deep geological repositories for our current waste.
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#31
And How Do You, Or Anyone Else, Know That The Posted Studies Are Legitimate - Trust In Authority?
cantbeserious
May 2014
#30
Peer-Reviewed - Easily Manipulated By Authorities - Only Publish Atomic Industry Friendly Articles
cantbeserious
May 2014
#33
So you just dismiss the entire institution of statistical investigation...
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#38
I Dismiss Blind Trust Placed In Online Articles When TPTB Can So Easily Corrupt Any Process Or Person
cantbeserious
May 2014
#47
So your argument essentially amounts to an irrational fear of the internet...
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#49
No Fear Of Internet - Only Great Concern For The Faith Some Place In Posted Studies And Articles
cantbeserious
May 2014
#50
So you are saying we cannot trust the websites for academic journals...
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#51
Are you saying that because the chance of corruption exists it must be happening?
Gravitycollapse
May 2014
#57
It's both depressing and amusing that people are still alarmed over this non-issue
JJChambers
May 2014
#42