General Discussion

longship

(40,416 posts)

77. Bye Robert. Pshaw!

Reply to RobertEarl (Reply #73)

Sat May 10, 2014, 03:53 AM

May 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

145 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

No Worries: Fukushima Radiation Didn't Make it to L.A. Beaches [View all] zappaman May 2014 OP

But the starfish! NuclearDem May 2014 #1

The OP is false RobertEarl May 2014 #5

Do you have a link? maddezmom May 2014 #7

Several links RobertEarl May 2014 #15

your article said "minute traces" dionysus May 2014 #24

In other words, a global catastrophe. NuclearDem May 2014 #27

Yep. Minute RobertEarl May 2014 #28

Please provide the peer reviewed studies, not the nuttiness of the site you provided. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #31

Don't bother. Citing ENENews is the equivalent of "I've got nothing." NuclearDem May 2014 #33

It sort of explains alot doesn't it? VanillaRhapsody May 2014 #52

Enenews is a great source RobertEarl May 2014 #34

ROTFLMAO FreakinDJ May 2014 #81

Bwhahahahahahahaha zappaman May 2014 #85

... SidDithers May 2014 #98

You are aware in this case "minute" means "substantially less than background radiation", right? Chan790 May 2014 #126

Eat your banana and smile, right? RobertEarl May 2014 #127

Have you started the speaking gigs yet? You can get paid for "spreading" this information! snooper2 May 2014 #141

. MohRokTah May 2014 #8

Nope, try again. Radiation still isn't killing the starfish. NuclearDem May 2014 #10

But... greytdemocrat May 2014 #14

LOL, real funny itsrobert May 2014 #131

uh huh zappaman May 2014 #13

And the NOAA map. NuclearDem May 2014 #16

300 tons of radioactive water has to end up somewhere, and in truedelphi May 2014 #18

That's 300 tons a day RobertEarl May 2014 #20

My that number seems scary! NuclearDem May 2014 #21

Math has a demonstrated pro-nuke bias. MohRokTah May 2014 #25

Ocean science is your next lesson, eh? RobertEarl May 2014 #29

Dude, you are using propaganda, not science. MohRokTah May 2014 #30

Eh? RobertEarl May 2014 #35

I have yet to see a single bit of solid science posted by you. eom MohRokTah May 2014 #37

That must mean you can't read RobertEarl May 2014 #39

Oh I can read. MohRokTah May 2014 #40

No paranoia here RobertEarl May 2014 #41

Where is the dilution factor in everything you are saying? MohRokTah May 2014 #43

So, no answers to simple questions? RobertEarl May 2014 #50

Anti-science? NuclearDem May 2014 #44

Thanks for putting up a good fight. truedelphi May 2014 #124

It's worth the effort RobertEarl May 2014 #125

It's been shown in models that the concentration of radioactive material is 2 to 27 becquerels... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #122

Isn't that the mapping of the tsunami? longship May 2014 #19

All it "gains" is the general public lumping rational nuclear skeptics in with the loons. NuclearDem May 2014 #22

Your hypothesis may still be operative. longship May 2014 #32

Fun? RobertEarl May 2014 #38

Well, might as well just have some fun with it. NuclearDem May 2014 #42

I despise nuclear energy. longship May 2014 #45

You are the only one making stuff up RobertEarl May 2014 #47

Actually, you were banned from E&E largely because you were making shit up and spamming it. NuclearDem May 2014 #48

You should not tell lies like that RobertEarl May 2014 #56

Trust me, I read through those threads in E&E NuclearDem May 2014 #59

That's not true RobertEarl May 2014 #62

Umm... dude pintobean May 2014 #90

I love you guys following me!! RobertEarl May 2014 #91

Umm... dude pintobean May 2014 #92

Bwahahaha NuclearDem May 2014 #93

Well, I pretty much owned this thread. RobertEarl May 2014 #94

You have an odd definition of owned. NuclearDem May 2014 #95

owned pintobean May 2014 #100

You pretty much owned this thread? pintobean May 2014 #97

Actually, I stole it RobertEarl May 2014 #101

No, but you certainly are WAY more amusing! zappaman May 2014 #103

You certainly have owned this thread zappaman May 2014 #99

LOL! maddezmom May 2014 #110

Sorry, my friend. longship May 2014 #49

Going? RobertEarl May 2014 #53

If you call bleeding out a patient management Generic Other May 2014 #138

Fukushima is a non-issue. Propoganda, conspiracy and tinfoil abound. JJChambers May 2014 #130

and and and time traveling radiation affecting them, too! ;) n/t X_Digger May 2014 #115

Go ahead and laugh Orrex May 2014 #137

And who says the Big Nuke industry doesn't have the ability to slant truedelphi May 2014 #2

I guess they paid off the scientists zappaman May 2014 #3

Unless you actually travel to see the scientists and talk to them, you don't have any truedelphi May 2014 #17

Isn't it funny how the only cooked books and bogus studies tend to be on the other side? NuclearDem May 2014 #11

Nobody would be so stupid as to claim sea star wasting was from Fukushima! longship May 2014 #80

The pacific has been radiated for a long time RobertEarl May 2014 #84

Damnit, I put those marshmallows out for nothing mindwalker_i May 2014 #4

Tinfoil keeps the Fukishima radiation out. MohRokTah May 2014 #6

This is great. PumpkinAle May 2014 #9

At least you'll roast evenly and come out juicy and tender. herding cats May 2014 #12

a real investigative journalist would cut you down to size... dionysus May 2014 #23

Keep breathing that WTC dust, all is fine. Nothing to worry about. Everything is gonna be fine 951-Riverside May 2014 #26

Non-sequitur. longship May 2014 #36

The science says RobertEarl May 2014 #46

The sea star crap was science illiteracy. longship May 2014 #51

Read this RobertEarl May 2014 #54

Oh my good God, why are you citing the welcome page like it means anything? NuclearDem May 2014 #57

From the site: OurRadioactiveOcean? longship May 2014 #61

Well, it actually is a WHOI project. NuclearDem May 2014 #64

I am on an iPhone here. longship May 2014 #69

Good Gawd RobertEarl May 2014 #65

Personal again? longship May 2014 #71

Go to bed RobertEarl May 2014 #73

Bye Robert. Pshaw! longship May 2014 #77

At least he is prepared! zappaman May 2014 #89

You know, that site wouldn't load on my iPhone. NuclearDem May 2014 #79

Why do you work so hard to tell us not to worry or believe? FreedRadical May 2014 #55

Of course, there is risk. longship May 2014 #58

What is killing the sea stars? RobertEarl May 2014 #60

Please do not make this personal. longship May 2014 #67

Don't make it personal? RobertEarl May 2014 #70

Of course radiation has been ruled out. longship May 2014 #76

Radiation has not been ruled out RobertEarl May 2014 #83

Sea stars are dying in the Atlantic as well NickB79 May 2014 #134

1990's you say? RobertEarl May 2014 #135

Oh now that I'm going to need evidence of. NuclearDem May 2014 #136

Here ya go, all sourced with further links RobertEarl May 2014 #145

"Did you know the east coast of the US did get its fair share of Fuku-plume?" zappaman May 2014 #139

Evidence of airborne depositions RobertEarl May 2014 #140

I think this poster handles it quite nicely zappaman May 2014 #142

Chernobyl's fallout blew from east to west NickB79 May 2014 #144

Well we know what it isn't.. radiation from Fukushima. Unless it's time traveling radiation. X_Digger May 2014 #116

That's dumb RobertEarl May 2014 #117

Radiation from Fukushima certainly can be discounted. Unless it can travel backwards in time. X_Digger May 2014 #118

Prove it. RobertEarl May 2014 #120

1) You don't prove negatives. NuclearDem May 2014 #121

You have been saying the science is bad, FreedRadical May 2014 #63

Because there are people who have spent most of their lives studying oceanography or radiation NuclearDem May 2014 #66

It's NOT safe. FreedRadical May 2014 #72

Uh. Huh. NuclearDem May 2014 #75

Cool. FreedRadical May 2014 #78

Longship is way out there RobertEarl May 2014 #68

I want to ask you RobertEarl, why are you fighting so hard too. FreedRadical May 2014 #74

Why fight? RobertEarl May 2014 #82

Thanks. FreedRadical May 2014 #86

Nuke industry is known for lies RobertEarl May 2014 #87

Radioactive cesium-137 released from Fukushima 1.5 times Tepco estimate: study 951-Riverside May 2014 #107

Have fun! WinkyDink May 2014 #88

What am I going to do with all this iodine... SidDithers May 2014 #96

Sounds like you could be on DOOMSDAY PREPPERS! zappaman May 2014 #102

Oh wow. That's awesome... SidDithers May 2014 #104

Just so you know RobertEarl May 2014 #105

People post about Louie Gohmert all the time but I wouldn't call him their idol. hobbit709 May 2014 #108

Louie Gohmert is awesome! zappaman May 2014 #111

Yes, and Fracking isn't causing earthquakes in Oklahoma dem in texas May 2014 #106

Pretty sure that's a completly different subject. zappaman May 2014 #112

That's bullshit, zappaman pintobean May 2014 #113

Cans are in these days. zappaman May 2014 #114

I've got one too ! "Unemployment is less than 7%" NM_Birder May 2014 #143

The radiation just disappeared! It's magic! meanit May 2014 #109

If it's real, why CAN'T YOU SEE IT?! Huh? HUH? closeupready May 2014 #119

Oil is a viscous, sticky, hydrophobic material... Gravitycollapse May 2014 #123

This strikes me as a NIMBY post... chervilant May 2014 #128

It actually is in my back yard zappaman May 2014 #129

You're in Japan? chervilant May 2014 #132

Los Angeles zappaman May 2014 #133