Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Fri May 9, 2014, 02:46 PM May 2014

Okay...anyone want to take a shot at explaining his motivation for THIS LATEST ACTION? [View all]

Last edited Fri May 9, 2014, 03:28 PM - Edit history (2)

Obama Directive Makes Mere Citing of Snowden Leaks Punishable Offense

Once promising the most transparent administration in history, White House reins in free speech of employees

- Jon Queally, staff writer

Directive from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) makes mention of news reporting referencing unauthorized informatin, like that leaked by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, a punishable offense. In a new policy directive from the Obama administrative, national security and other government officials will no longer be allowed to publicly discuss or even reference news reporting that is based on "unauthorized leaks."

President Obama once promised the American people that his administration would be the most transparent in history, but after years of fights with civil libertarians trying to obtain legal memos used to justify the president's overseas assassination program, an unprecedented pattern of prosecuting government whistleblowers, the targeting of journalists, and all the secrecy and obfuscation related to the NSA's mass surviellance programs made public by Edward Snowden, that claim is now met with near universal laughter, if not scorn, by critics.



According to the New York Times:

A new pre-publication review policy for the Office of Director of National Intelligence says the agency’s current and former employees and contractors may not cite news reports based on leaks in their speeches, opinion articles, books, term papers or other unofficial writings.

Such officials “must not use sourcing that comes from known leaks, or unauthorized disclosures of sensitive information,” it says. “The use of such information in a publication can confirm the validity of an unauthorized disclosure and cause further harm to national security.”

Failure to comply “may result in the imposition of civil and administrative penalties, and may result in the loss of security clearances and accesses,” it says.



Timothy H. Edgar, a visiting professor at Brown University, told the Times the ODNI directive is overly restrictive because it goes beyond telling officials they cannot comment on or confirm the accuracy of unauthorized leaks—something he thinks makes sense and is already covered by statute—but it bizarrely asserts that these people cannot even acknowledge the existence of a story that may have appeared on the cover of a major newspaper.

“You’re basically saying people can’t talk about what everyone in the country is talking about,”
Edgar said. “I think that is awkward and overly broad in terms of restricting speech.”

The new rule was first reported by journalist Steve Aftergood at the Secrecy News website on Thursday and relates to other rules that guide national security officials who are speak to the press or in public forums.

Referencing the Times reporting on the directive, the president's critics were focused on the continued hypocrisy between claims of transparency by the president and other high-level officials and the reality represented by the continued attempt to by the White House and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper to control information:

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2014/05/09
______________________________________
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.

-----------DOCUMENT LINKS MENTIONED IN ARTICLE----------------

Official Document:

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/1156526-instr-80-04-pre-publication-review-of.html\

AND...

DOCU LINKS from "Secrecy News Website" at:


ODNI Requires Pre-Publication Review of All Public Information

Categories: Intelligence, Secrecy News Website

All employees of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence are required to obtain authorization before disclosing any intelligence-related information to the public.

“All ODNI personnel are required to submit all official and non-official information intended for public release for review,” says ODNI Instruction 80.04 on “Pre-publication Review of Information to be Publicly Released.” The Instruction was newly updated on April 8.

http://blogs.fas.org/secrecy/2014/05/odni-prepub/


19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does it ProSense May 2014 #1
The OP title implies that Obama never does anything right. This is just the latest example. pampango May 2014 #17
I can't even find it on their website the- Directive from the Office of the Director of National Int Sunlei May 2014 #2
Just added the links to the OP...and here...in answer to you: KoKo May 2014 #4
Thanks! The official Gov. website has to much information.Obama must be superman to keep track of it Sunlei May 2014 #7
This is the part that is ridiculous and over reach...but, watch them prosecute someone .... KoKo May 2014 #8
wish all the patriot act went away, its caused our country nothing but grief and trillions of our $. Sunlei May 2014 #9
I'm not sure it really goes further than what Professor Edgar says is already covered karynnj May 2014 #12
Given the Track Record of our Presidents in past few decades...wouldn't YOU KoKo May 2014 #18
But..but..it will protect our delicate ears from hearing what our (allegedly "our") government does. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2014 #3
Because, technically... It's all TOP SECRET IAMWE May 2014 #5
11th Dimensional Chess bahrbearian May 2014 #6
I know...It's not for us to know...but, to BELIEVE! And that's what it's about.... KoKo May 2014 #16
Farther and farther we fall down the Rabbit Hole. bvar22 May 2014 #10
OMG!!! THEY'RE TRYING TO PROTECT CLASSIFIED!!!!! jeff47 May 2014 #11
Good point...so how do we get legislation for what you point out here...... KoKo May 2014 #19
ODNI clarifying protection of intelligence to intelligence workers Godhumor May 2014 #13
Yes...because the "Devil is in the Details." If you take the time to read.. KoKo May 2014 #14
K&R DeSwiss May 2014 #15
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Okay...anyone want to tak...