Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
Sun Mar 16, 2014, 10:03 PM Mar 2014

Should women who need maternity coverage pay more for insurance than those who don't? [View all]

I know we shouldn't need a poll for this...


35 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Insurance with maternity coverage should cost the same as other insurance
32 (91%)
Insurance with maternity coverage should cost more than insurance without
3 (9%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
115 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pass - Universal health care should not include "insurance" PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #1
In Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, it does... CreekDog Mar 2014 #3
How much water should be used for waterboarding? PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #9
yes, that's exactly the same thing as requiring insurance companies to cover maternity CreekDog Mar 2014 #11
you missed my point then. PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #12
when you post BS, people stop reading CreekDog Mar 2014 #17
It only appeared BS because you stopped reading. eom PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #18
This thread questions the "right" of private, for-profit insurers to make $$$$, that's why. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #50
That's why I passed. LWolf Mar 2014 #113
You're probably equally likely to get cancer in a lifetime. Should you pay more for that? Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #2
because a number of people here think maternity coverage should not be included CreekDog Mar 2014 #4
Who's saying that? Gravitycollapse Mar 2014 #6
You can click on "show user names" to see who is in favor so far. Arugula Latte Mar 2014 #86
Which is of course the whole point. It's yet another shit-list generating exercise. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #91
Well, I don't want to have to pay for their Viagra or Cialis, then. calimary Mar 2014 #8
You dont wanna go there jamzrockz Mar 2014 #35
"....women on average will run up more healthcare dollars than the average man..." LINK? WinkyDink Mar 2014 #41
here lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #64
except that women are paying in proportionately every month during those extra years.... bettyellen Mar 2014 #90
Men that were born Aerows Mar 2014 #94
Retroactive insurance? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #95
You were born, though, right? Aerows Mar 2014 #101
I'm relieved to learn that since my birth debt is valued in 1962 dollars... lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #104
Welcome to DU, jamzrockz! calimary Mar 2014 #58
Same people who say... ElboRuum Mar 2014 #23
THREE. Count'em, THREE. BFD. WinkyDink Mar 2014 #40
try 8 CreekDog Mar 2014 #115
Because some people will never need it. Daemonaquila Mar 2014 #36
IOW, you simply don't believe in any universal coverage. WinkyDink Mar 2014 #42
Of course, it will be other women's children Crunchy Frog Mar 2014 #61
once we start dividing up the pool, it isn't a pool any more.... mike_c Mar 2014 #5
i agree. CreekDog Mar 2014 #7
+1 gollygee Mar 2014 #38
NO, elleng Mar 2014 #10
No, it doesn't. Daemonaquila Mar 2014 #37
i am NEVER gonna get spinal bifida, so i do not want to pay. seabeyond Mar 2014 #49
I will never get prostate cancer and don't want to have to pay for it. uppityperson Mar 2014 #92
Should men pay more because they are more prone to cardiovascular disease? Warpy Mar 2014 #13
Men use less healthcare than women. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #46
last i heard mercuryblues Mar 2014 #70
I'm not arguing for how to make mandatory for-profit insurance "fair". Just pointing out Romulox Mar 2014 #72
Republicans simply can't wrap their heads around it DefenseLawyer Mar 2014 #14
We shouldn't need insurance to stay alive and be healthy LittleBlue Mar 2014 #15
Yes, how much is your life worth to you? PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #21
The cost of all pregnancies and childbirth should be socialized and funded from general taxation, Nye Bevan Mar 2014 #16
Its like asking should people who don't have children pay taxes for education. undeterred Mar 2014 #19
The idea that those who likely need more care pay more is already established in the ACA Fumesucker Mar 2014 #20
There are three tiers related to age. But everyone who lives will eventually pnwmom Mar 2014 #25
Everyone here has a mother. Pay it forward. hunter Mar 2014 #22
the problem is that some people think it's fair to cover their own health issues CreekDog Mar 2014 #31
this is the lame Republican approach to Health Care, dude WhaTHellsgoingonhere Mar 2014 #24
That is how insurance works MiniMe Mar 2014 #26
Other option: mandate that the father's pay in full for all maternity care / childbirth costs? DebJ Mar 2014 #27
My kids cost over $50k each. jeff47 Mar 2014 #59
Sorry I should have used the sarcasm thingie. My comment was aimed at those DebJ Mar 2014 #60
Healthy babies are the future! Go healthy Babies! nt Walk away Mar 2014 #28
EVERYONE NEEDS MATERNITY COVERAGE AT SOME TIME IN THEIR LIFE!!!!!!! MADem Mar 2014 #29
You should pay for maternity coverage Mr.Bill Mar 2014 #30
it's a ridiculous question Skittles Mar 2014 #32
to most it is a ridiculous question CreekDog Mar 2014 #33
oh yeah, THOSE folk Skittles Mar 2014 #34
This is clearly a "divide, conquer, and take more money" plan. WinkyDink Mar 2014 #39
From a business standpoint, hell no. riqster Mar 2014 #43
No. Iggo Mar 2014 #44
No for maternity but madville Mar 2014 #45
As long as obese is defined by body fat % and not BMI. BMI discriminates against MillennialDem Mar 2014 #111
As long as health INSURANCE is private, and for-profit, it should follow actuarial principles. Romulox Mar 2014 #47
"We need to change the entire system" - TBF Mar 2014 #52
It's "not fair" to deny people care because they can't pay, period. You and I agree. nt Romulox Mar 2014 #53
not if those principles disriminate CreekDog Mar 2014 #89
Um for-profit insurance discriminates against people who can't pay. Romulox Mar 2014 #110
if you'd like us to not talk about discrimination against women, just tell everyone that CreekDog Mar 2014 #114
no, every person should be covered for everything. we should throw out the middlemen profiteers. Sunlei Mar 2014 #48
PASS: Healthcare Insurance is an obscenity. CBGLuthier Mar 2014 #51
I voted PASS for the same reason. Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #56
so you don't think it should be illegal to charge women more for insurance that covers that? CreekDog Mar 2014 #63
If there MUST be an insurance based model, the idea of Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #67
underwriting is allowed in Obamacare? CreekDog Mar 2014 #68
Here-- Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #69
OK, I went off on a tangent there. Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #73
I agree with you 100%. CreekDog Mar 2014 #76
There used to be a saying, "It takes two to tango." A man and a woman created this circumstance. jwirr Mar 2014 #54
Yes, maybe both parents' insurance should be charged. Or, of course, just have djean111 Mar 2014 #55
They are. A 25 year old man pays the same as a 25 year old woman... lumberjack_jeff Mar 2014 #62
Society is better off if all people have access to health care. Jackpine Radical Mar 2014 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Mar 2014 #65
No Sheepshank Mar 2014 #66
Who voted it should cost more?? Pregnancy is NOT an illness. Avalux Mar 2014 #71
"No" votes attack women, not "Yes" votes CreekDog Mar 2014 #74
Ha, thanks! Avalux Mar 2014 #78
i realize the poll question is flipped from the OP subject line CreekDog Mar 2014 #79
Should you only buy homeowners' insurance when you smell smoke? SoCalDem Mar 2014 #75
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #77
what if it wasn't a choice? CreekDog Mar 2014 #80
. CreekDog Mar 2014 #82
We simply need universal coverage. Until then we have an every man for himself system. nt Demo_Chris Mar 2014 #81
should men who need penis pumps pay more? oldandhappy Mar 2014 #83
Maternity coverage? Smoking? Weight? Speeding tickets? Etc... polichick Mar 2014 #84
. gollygee Mar 2014 #85
First, maternity is the main "bubble buster" of the young-people-don't-need-insurance myth OmahaBlueDog Mar 2014 #87
we keep using this word "insurance" alc Mar 2014 #88
Were you born? Aerows Mar 2014 #93
Yes, but the state should provide free-at-point-of-use healthcare, rendering it moot. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #96
No, your answer is not correct, you should have said: CreekDog Mar 2014 #97
No, my answer was correct and yours is wrong. Donald Ian Rankin Mar 2014 #98
do not call maternity coverage welfare CreekDog Mar 2014 #99
... PowerToThePeople Mar 2014 #102
yes, he said charging the same for the two things was "welfare" CreekDog Mar 2014 #103
If it is medically necessary or restorative then it should be covered. TheKentuckian Mar 2014 #100
My only issue isnt necessarily with maternity coverage davidn3600 Mar 2014 #105
and you've posted against men being paid on average higher wages than women? CreekDog Mar 2014 #106
I have never posted anything that suggests men should make more money than women davidn3600 Mar 2014 #107
you're complaining here that women's health care costs more CreekDog Mar 2014 #108
I complain when anybody is favored... davidn3600 Mar 2014 #109
Creekdog, it's a FOR PROFIT system. Quit saying everybody needs to shoulder the load, when some are Romulox Mar 2014 #112
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should women who need mat...