Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Care 2: Would You Be Willing to Pay More to Dine Out if it Meant Healthcare for Workers? [View all]
http://www.care2.com/causes/would-you-be-willing-to-pay-more-to-dine-out-if-it-meant-healthcare-for-workers.htmlby Robin Marty February 22, 2014 5:30 pm
A Los Angeles restaurant is facing heavy criticism from diners over a new policy that has added a 3 percent tax to the ticket when dining out. The new surcharge is meant to allow the business to pay for the health care insurance costs for their employees, but customers are split over whether the blatant add-on is an open and honest admission about the costs of doing business, or a sign that restaurant owners are simply gouging their guests.
According to the LA Times, Republique restaurant is embarking on a new, transparent means of passing on health care costs to consumers, with a 3 percent Healthy LA surcharge per diner. The charge, according to the restaurant owners, will go directly to paying for new employee health insurance plans, a must have under the new Affordable Care Act for any business that employs more than 50 full time employees. Some of the plans that will be offered will be completely paid for by the company, others will have employees pay a portion of the cost, but all will be accessible to all workers, regardless of whether they are hourly, tip based, at the front of the restaurant or back in the kitchens.
The charge, however, has some diners upset. According to the newspaper, one customer even asked if the surcharge could be removed from her ticket, saying she doesnt appreciate an extra tax thats added without sufficient explanation, and she has no way of knowing whether the restaurant will use the extra money for the stated cause.
If the restaurant were really trying to pull one over on its customers, though, it would make far more sense to hide the additional costs within menu items with higher prices or smaller portions. Instead, that was what the owners said that they were trying to avoid by putting the charge in the open, both in the menu and on the final bill.
Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/would-you-be-willing-to-pay-more-to-dine-out-if-it-meant-healthcare-for-workers.html#ixzz2uBVuAVxJ
FULL story at link.
5 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Yes | |
3 (60%) |
|
NO WAY! | |
0 (0%) |
|
Maybe | |
1 (20%) |
|
Other (please post your thoughts on his one) | |
1 (20%) |
|
Thanks to Reagan economics I (we) can't afford to eat out | |
0 (0%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Care 2: Would You Be Willing to Pay More to Dine Out if it Meant Healthcare for Workers? [View all]
Omaha Steve
Feb 2014
OP
Willing to pay more but would really prefer that the cost be reflected in the menu pricing.
Gormy Cuss
Feb 2014
#2
I'd rather remove wall street health care insurance companies from our health care cost equation....
democratisphere
Feb 2014
#3
Dining out is already prohibitively expensive and, in my household, is a rare occasion
JJChambers
Feb 2014
#5