Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

CFLDem

(2,083 posts)
158. Already took those classes
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 11:58 PM
Feb 2014

and got the degree. Hell I even got some t-shirts out of it, too.

You are mistaken 1000words Feb 2014 #1
No you are dsc Feb 2014 #7
So objectification is okay, sometimes? 1000words Feb 2014 #8
I think the SI thread would have been fine in the lounge dsc Feb 2014 #9
What's the difference? 1000words Feb 2014 #10
That's my understanding as well. Any reaction other than utter contempt for objectification was met Jetboy Feb 2014 #13
The difference is that people don't go into the lounge expecting progressive political discussions. pnwmom Feb 2014 #14
We are discussing the issue of objectification 1000words Feb 2014 #17
I understand that; which is why I don't think T & A photos belong in G.D. pnwmom Feb 2014 #42
It always amazes me when people think GD is -meaner- Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #65
The meanest place is where a woman got called a dog without repurcussions. Jetboy Feb 2014 #249
Frankly I'm not sure I come to DU expecting that these days... Scootaloo Feb 2014 #64
Most of the time the Lounge is far more 'progressive' than GD. GoneOffShore Feb 2014 #193
No it wasn't dsc Feb 2014 #16
So the author of the OP is indeed mistaken 1000words Feb 2014 #20
Huh? dsc Feb 2014 #23
You seem to be hung up on the idea ... 1000words Feb 2014 #32
we are not engaging in it dsc Feb 2014 #36
So when I say that a woman has a nice ass, neither am I. 1000words Feb 2014 #41
It is objectification dsc Feb 2014 #44
I can live with that 1000words Feb 2014 #52
hey, Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #78
THIS /\ right here Vanje Mar 2014 #435
It. is also wholly inappropriate in the LGBT forum Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #48
thank you for sharing that ... some great insight in that post. Thank you. Brave post. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #80
It was an extremely unpleasant two weeks, Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #195
again I am so sorry my dad died at an inconvenient time for you dsc Feb 2014 #237
Your assertion that a similar recent thread was perfectly acceptable Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #277
You have every right tonot like the decision that I and the other hosts made in regards to beefcake dsc Feb 2014 #332
The hosts who were active Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #341
I am going to say one and only one thing about your post dsc Feb 2014 #103
thank you for this. transparency ... while I think MsToad has/had a point. I hope this can all be Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #115
thanks it wasn't a pleasant time dsc Feb 2014 #122
I understand - Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #124
Here is the exchange, so people can judge for themselves Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #186
What? You get to decide my gender now? Jamastiene Feb 2014 #214
I was very explicit about what troubled me Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #298
Thanks Jamastiene. Puglover Feb 2014 #360
I am also an LBGT host , and a lesbian Vanje Mar 2014 #436
I am sorry my dad died at a time inconvenient for you dsc Feb 2014 #234
What I said was Ms. Toad Feb 2014 #318
We aren't mind readers. plantwomyn Feb 2014 #306
Very very well said JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #2
In my opinion CFLDem Feb 2014 #3
Excellent post. eom. In_The_Wind Feb 2014 #6
I was surprised that the women here did not support the models, other women Cleita Feb 2014 #12
weren't you leaving DU? Kali Feb 2014 #51
oh Kali, you are crackin' me up ... Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #84
feel like I musta missed something Kali Feb 2014 #88
I am dear as soon as I set up a blog where I can really say what I think of you Cleita Feb 2014 #197
This message was self-deleted by its author Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #213
Cleita... MrMickeysMom Feb 2014 #262
That's sweet of you and you are right of course. Cleita Feb 2014 #266
If you really want to help, get involved in political campaigns... ConservativeDemocrat Feb 2014 #281
Thanks. I have done that in the past, but I'm slowing down and too old for the leg Cleita Feb 2014 #282
Excellent advice. nt SunSeeker Feb 2014 #284
That strawman is getting larger by the minute BainsBane Feb 2014 #56
+a million. nt laundry_queen Feb 2014 #212
+1 JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #218
NO one is NOT supporting them...its about having a fair playing field on DU... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #196
Instead we got drooling and chortling. n/t pnwmom Feb 2014 #15
"Don't want to see T&A? Trash it or ignore it. " etherealtruth Feb 2014 #19
Honest Abe has some advice for the prudes you describe: CFLDem Feb 2014 #148
You should adhere to it. nt Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #215
You should have taken it etherealtruth Feb 2014 #223
This message was self-deleted by its author CFLDem Feb 2014 #225
What part of Abe's comment didn't you understand? Squinch Feb 2014 #236
If you read it correctly CFLDem Feb 2014 #243
If you read Abe correctly, Squinch Feb 2014 #244
Well clearly we're both illiterate. CFLDem Feb 2014 #270
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #322
Woah there CFLDem Feb 2014 #326
I can only imagine the ethical and mental convenience given to those who conflate civility and prudi LanternWaste Feb 2014 #368
You should try it some time. CFLDem Feb 2014 #373
"And what is more liberal than freedom?" - Cheesy, meaningless bullshit. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #22
Shit even O'Reilly would't say Scootaloo Feb 2014 #73
Normally it's called framing CFLDem Feb 2014 #145
Every Joe Blow libertarian waxes poetic about the primacy of "freedom." Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #154
Already took those classes CFLDem Feb 2014 #158
Well then I'd certainly ask for my money back if I were you. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #161
... CFLDem Feb 2014 #163
Laughter truly is the best medicine. I hope you feel better. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #171
I do. CFLDem Feb 2014 #172
In a truly gender equal society, the SI cover wouldn't exist BainsBane Feb 2014 #46
I was in JC Penney this evening with my SO and we walked by the women lingerie department. RC Feb 2014 #149
Give it a rest BainsBane Feb 2014 #210
The original SISI thread was never locked. pintobean Feb 2014 #222
Then why you'd post that? RC Feb 2014 #228
If you want T&A, build your own website. Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #216
more offensive than the actual post is the typical attacks BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #273
"jerk-off material"? pintobean Feb 2014 #274
Yep CFLDem Feb 2014 #301
I know CFLDem Feb 2014 #275
well....the "HoF crowd's" postings strike me more as the logical result BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #276
It also looks to my amateur judgement CFLDem Feb 2014 #302
you're being cryptic, and I dont get it. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #307
Read post 301. nt CFLDem Feb 2014 #308
im on mobile. ..can't see numbers. BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2014 #311
The unintended and sometimes negative consequences of that same freedom... LanternWaste Feb 2014 #366
so you don't care about hostile environments? Gotcha! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #370
If the SI cover, which is out in the supermarkets in full view, were in fact naked women showing Cleita Feb 2014 #4
Apparently you live in a beachside community but RBStevens Feb 2014 #98
Really, this is serious? Cleita Feb 2014 #143
Please read my question again if you will RBStevens Feb 2014 #150
I just saw it the other day. CFLDem Feb 2014 #151
Spontaneously topless in a public space RBStevens Feb 2014 #156
I'd say more coed. CFLDem Feb 2014 #157
I do not understand this response. RBStevens Feb 2014 #160
They were more college aged. CFLDem Feb 2014 #169
It's known as a fashion photo shoot. Pick up any Style, Marie Claire or Vogue and you will see Cleita Feb 2014 #153
You are still not answering my question - RBStevens Feb 2014 #159
Well, beach is where those photo shoots are done. What is wrong with topless anyway Cleita Feb 2014 #162
No I do not hate women. And yes, I know that women go topless in many places. RBStevens Feb 2014 #166
So are you spontaneous at your job? You do know that a fashion shoot is a job, not just for Cleita Feb 2014 #170
Please remember that the question I posed to you was RBStevens Feb 2014 #181
I can't continue this ridiculous line of questioning. It's a magazine. Cleita Feb 2014 #185
But it's just the same and only question I've been asking all along RBStevens Feb 2014 #188
It's a stupid question only a stupid person would answer. Cleita Feb 2014 #191
Why is the question stupid? RBStevens Feb 2014 #198
Go see a priest. Confess your sins. You will be absolved of all those sinful Cleita Feb 2014 #200
Why will you not answer this simple question? RBStevens Feb 2014 #202
Because I'm a free person and don't have to answer any questions. Your Cleita Feb 2014 #203
But I am not ordering you, I am asking you. RBStevens Feb 2014 #204
And I'm telling you to piss off. Yet, you persist. Cleita Feb 2014 #205
Okay. Good night then. RBStevens Feb 2014 #206
Why are you asking a question you seem to already know the answer to? AlbertCat Feb 2014 #296
I asked the question of a woman who lives in a beach RBStevens Feb 2014 #299
What does spontaneity have to do with it? Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #381
I'm glad you asked - RBStevens Feb 2014 #389
I highly doubt that they do. I hate the beach, personally. Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #390
My point is probably to much to explain RBStevens Feb 2014 #391
I think women are objectified in the media in both spontaneous and Common Sense Party Feb 2014 #392
Ok..... The Straight Story Feb 2014 #207
uh no the SI SSE is not a "fashion shoot", that is just bullshit. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #253
That's true so if women are buying all the bikinis, guess who they are marketing to. n/t Cleita Feb 2014 #255
your argument is circular. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #257
Really? I guess I must tell my professional athlete women friends from the gym Cleita Feb 2014 #267
77% male readers. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #272
I see stuff like this on a weekly basis Soundman Feb 2014 #278
You know, what I don't understand is why RBStevens Feb 2014 #280
I see your point and I can say Soundman Feb 2014 #287
Thank you for your response. But therein lies the difference - RBStevens Feb 2014 #289
If you ever figure it out let me know. Soundman Feb 2014 #294
No, they don't. rrneck Feb 2014 #288
And your experience is that they don't. Mine too. RBStevens Feb 2014 #290
But remember rrneck Feb 2014 #292
I'm clear on that. RBStevens Feb 2014 #293
The SI cover WAS posted by a woman Bonobo Feb 2014 #5
As were most of the threads perpetuating the gender wars Major Nikon Feb 2014 #27
As is this one perpetuating it too? zeemike Feb 2014 #107
That doesn't even pass the laugh test BainsBane Feb 2014 #382
Is Riff not a member of your group? n/t seaglass Feb 2014 #31
We don't have "members". Bonobo Feb 2014 #35
Yeah she does post in your group - mostly in the Hot celebrity thread which I see is not one seaglass Feb 2014 #38
Indeed I do not post in that thread. Thank you for noticing. Bonobo Feb 2014 #47
Well I appreciate that. n/t seaglass Feb 2014 #53
Oh give me a break BainsBane Feb 2014 #383
Well, you finally changed that claim pintobean Feb 2014 #387
There's two groups of people trolling each other in GD TransitJohn Feb 2014 #11
177 people have said they see those threads as part of a hostile environment BainsBane Feb 2014 #63
Can't look beyond HoF. RC Feb 2014 #164
It is so obvious that opinon on this site is entirely against your views on this issue BainsBane Feb 2014 #211
Then put me on "Ignore" RC Feb 2014 #233
You are objecting to not being allowed to objectify women in the General Discussion... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #369
Who is objectifying women? RC Feb 2014 #371
it is not ABOUT those women...it is ABOUT how those pictures were VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #372
In the where?? polly7 Feb 2014 #375
YOU know where.....I am not interested in those threads..they sound disgusting to me VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #376
No, 'I' don't know where. polly7 Feb 2014 #378
I saw the rules to those threads posted....I am NOT going there... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #379
LOL polly7 Feb 2014 #380
I'm not HoF but I'm 100% on their side on this. Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #217
And I am not a MRA type. RC Feb 2014 #239
I didn't say you were... Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #241
Other people read these threads too. RC Feb 2014 #245
Many men (like me) on DU disagree with that assessment. Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #246
You don't recognize bullying when you see it? RC Feb 2014 #247
I do. I just think that you're the bully, not the object of your vendetta. Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #248
I'm a bully for objecting to bullying? RC Feb 2014 #250
I have no doubt in my mind that you believe that you are right. Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #251
And as do you. RC Feb 2014 #252
Since this subthread was in response to one of my posts BainsBane Feb 2014 #384
The bully-as-victim schtick... A favorite of all high-schoolers. Democracyinkind Feb 2014 #385
Thanks. I appreciate the support. nt BainsBane Feb 2014 #386
Holy crap Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #303
But you have to admire the perfect consistency. Squinch Feb 2014 #327
Absolute truth. nt UtahLib Feb 2014 #343
Isn't that the truth! n/t demmiblue Feb 2014 #346
While I think both HoF *and* the Men's Group have been unfairly characterized at times nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #398
I disagree with that, completely! nt. polly7 Feb 2014 #431
Yet you condemn those who fail to toe your own "line." nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #397
As I said, I have a problem with the almost constant bullying by RC Feb 2014 #429
And There Are No MRA here libodem Feb 2014 #283
It bothers me to see that claim being made, polly7 Feb 2014 #286
Thank you libodem Feb 2014 #336
You know, we may seem to be on slightly opposite sides at times, but I have no problem nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #399
I don't understand how my post could in any way be controversial or problematic, polly7 Feb 2014 #400
It isn't, to me. But you know how people around here - on all sides - will twist others' words nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #402
Oh, I know certain people who do that ALL the time. polly7 Feb 2014 #404
I basically agree with that assessment. Though it may be as much a general human tendency to nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #406
You can usually tell pretty easily when it's oversimplification or not understanding ... polly7 Feb 2014 #407
I agree that the caricaturing and name-calling frequently gets out of hand around here. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #409
right. Just people uttering standard MRA talking points. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #313
Haven't seen it libodem Feb 2014 #337
Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #350
. pintobean Feb 2014 #352
This message was self-deleted by its author uppityperson Feb 2014 #364
some people think they are being fair hfojvt Feb 2014 #96
false equivalency argument. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #254
Not really. TransitJohn Feb 2014 #258
Is it really worth 5 threads a day on this? pacalo Feb 2014 #18
Cool. You're angry for call outs. And your solution for this is to do exactly what you despise. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #25
"And your solution for this is to do exactly what you despise." pacalo Feb 2014 #28
Does blocking a problem from your consciousness involve talking about it a lot? Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #29
I used the keyword auto-trash function last night. pacalo Feb 2014 #50
Thank MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #39
That means a lot... pacalo Feb 2014 #54
Shucks... MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #108
totally agree... DontTreadOnMe Feb 2014 #260
^^That. Orrex Feb 2014 #114
I am awful because I think it is funny Bok_Tukalo Feb 2014 #21
There's intolerance and rude behavior on both sides in the gender wars on DU mokawanis Feb 2014 #24
I rec'd the OP, but I agree with this as well. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #401
Beautifully written post, whooshing like a jet over the heads of many here. Squinch Feb 2014 #26
But it is mistaken from the beginning. The SI cover OP was started by a woman. nt Bonobo Feb 2014 #30
... Kali Feb 2014 #45
I'll stoop beating that horse when I feel that fact has been recognized. Bonobo Feb 2014 #49
who cares who posted it? Kali Feb 2014 #57
^^Exactly, right, Kali^^ hlthe2b Feb 2014 #60
It's funny. The SOP of GD doesn't say that. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #110
What is so important about your presumed right to post Kate Upton pics in GD? nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #403
I am totally stealing that gif. nt rrneck Feb 2014 #66
well Kali Feb 2014 #74
... Whisp Feb 2014 #61
Oh? The Straight Story Feb 2014 #33
When you pull it out like that, JAbuchan08 Feb 2014 #295
If one sees any of the opinions expressed on here as "extremely controlling and nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #405
Thanks? JAbuchan08 Mar 2014 #434
You sound like a mature and grown up man Whisp Feb 2014 #34
It just is funny that you don't see belittling men at every opportunity as analogous Bonobo Feb 2014 #37
but, do you ever call women - girls ... ? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #102
From the POV of goading, stabbing at and pricking people, it is the same. Bonobo Feb 2014 #116
honestly ,,, and I hate the term War but, truly --- Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #121
I totally agree. And that is the funny thing. Bonobo Feb 2014 #130
I agree that there's been over-the-top rhetoric all around. And my own frustration with things nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #410
"When I read posts like JTFrog's I am reminded what is truly at stake here." nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #408
+1 freshwest Feb 2014 #433
And so to end the Gender wars you call out only the men and tell "men" they must change... Drew Richards Feb 2014 #40
What exactly is a "rad fem"? etherealtruth Feb 2014 #55
"Rad" is short for "radical". pacalo Feb 2014 #59
Well, I am glad you set me straight "its use is most appropriate here in this discussion" etherealtruth Feb 2014 #62
Glad you asked. pacalo Feb 2014 #76
I especailly like your point about words that are used in everyday language etherealtruth Feb 2014 #86
You've brought up *another* big turn-off for me. pacalo Feb 2014 #91
Turning you on is not something I would have any interest in etherealtruth Feb 2014 #94
"Their feminity (sic) is not one of them." pacalo Feb 2014 #97
It is someone who holds the radical notion BainsBane Feb 2014 #69
There doesn't seem to be anything radical in that etherealtruth Feb 2014 #87
I don't think DU'ers literally believe that women aren't people. But their worldview is myopic and nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #412
Radical Feminist rrneck Feb 2014 #70
So, it is not intended as an insult? etherealtruth Feb 2014 #75
I don't think so. rrneck Feb 2014 #82
Its usage reminds me of an appellation applied to another group of people etherealtruth Feb 2014 #99
Yep. Context is important. rrneck Feb 2014 #104
If you read the post I was initially responding to etherealtruth Feb 2014 #109
that would depend on context Kali Feb 2014 #89
The post and poster I asked the question of ... etherealtruth Feb 2014 #111
Depends on whose moth it comes out of, just like the term "feminist." yewberry Feb 2014 #119
177 recs BainsBane Feb 2014 #67
Kinda curious BainsBane Feb 2014 #72
And here is a perfect example of what I am talking about...a direct personal attack on my character Drew Richards Feb 2014 #396
10 DUers? You need to recount. I have seen hundreds of posters come out against these images. Squinch Feb 2014 #120
That is NOT what he said. Not at all. RC Feb 2014 #178
THIS! +1000% RC Feb 2014 #176
+++++ Cleita Feb 2014 #279
Are they really attacking all men? Or only those men who belittle women seeking social justice nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #411
What about some of us women who've also been hurt very badly, polly7 Feb 2014 #416
I agree that you and others have been treated unfairly. I'm not perfectly objective nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #418
You're a good person, and there's certainly nothing wrong with being a dreamer! polly7 Feb 2014 #423
Thanks! You too! nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #425
Impressive, Flying Squirrel... Eloquent hlthe2b Feb 2014 #43
Thanks, Flying Squirrel BainsBane Feb 2014 #58
Shaming tactics never works Harmony Blue Feb 2014 #68
Another example of incorrectly framing a position with which you disagree. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #77
The poster who disagrees with you is either a dolt or a troll? Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #117
Again, another post incorrectly framing an opposing argument. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #118
It's a pretty accurate framing, in fact Orrex Feb 2014 #126
I am correct in this instance. Incorrectly framing feminist arguments on DU is a beloved pastime. Gravitycollapse Feb 2014 #132
Interesting response. Orrex Feb 2014 #155
You mean the shaming tactics you used against BainsBane Feb 2014 #79
sure it does Kali Feb 2014 #90
Why not? It's worked for years wid gunz, right? Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #113
If the default is still "human" = "male" then I don't see how "humanism" is some great marker nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #413
If objectification is an issue, then discussions about it belong in GD. rrneck Feb 2014 #71
It seems DU members are to "admit" to objectification and/or "privilege" Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #92
Yeah. I think it goes back to rrneck Feb 2014 #100
Comfort food or warm place to shit. Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #106
Wow, I haven't heard that phrase since Earl Butz. Tanuki Feb 2014 #123
It's a metaphor or off-color joke; Butz picked his embellished version... Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #152
Unfortunately we don't usually get to the why of it. yewberry Feb 2014 #128
Well, in the interest of transparency... rrneck Feb 2014 #134
"No meaningful legislation possible" is probably correct, in this instance. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #414
The real question is why is it an issue and what are we to do about it? Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #129
Yep. rrneck Feb 2014 #135
However, Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #137
I don't understand the term "intersection" rrneck Feb 2014 #139
I am referring to how there is a cross section Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #140
I hear you. rrneck Feb 2014 #144
K&R nt redqueen Feb 2014 #81
Simple common courtesy goes a long way LostOne4Ever Feb 2014 #83
+100 RC Feb 2014 #182
Bringing up this topic... liberalmuse Feb 2014 #85
Well said. Squinch Feb 2014 #125
I wouldn't assume someone is f'd up on gender issues RainDog Feb 2014 #133
I think the Hosts should be held responsible for that behavior in their forum.... msanthrope Feb 2014 #146
It's curious RainDog Feb 2014 #165
It's worth noting that one of the -few- hides I've had, was for speculating that someone wasn't what Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #175
well... RainDog Feb 2014 #179
I'm actually a carefully constructed AI algorithm, sort of a research project at Caltech Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #180
math makes me cry RainDog Feb 2014 #184
Sure, you laugh, but the only thing standing between me and total world domination Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #187
I'm afraid I'll be sent to rock school RainDog Feb 2014 #192
Great tune! Not a huge YLT fan but I love that one... nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #415
You get a green arrow! RainDog Feb 2014 #417
"Julie Christie, the rumors are true..." nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #420
You Pinky or Brain? 1000words Feb 2014 #201
Just don't put it in GD, for heaven's sake! Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #190
LOL RainDog Feb 2014 #194
I've been amazed at the on and offsite speculation regarding msanthrope Feb 2014 #221
You can alert on any post anywhere. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #315
^^Thread win. Orrex Feb 2014 #183
Manny's thread was making fun of this rural, conservative mindset RainDog Feb 2014 #199
bs. just bs. that is all. and thanks for the link so people can read it for themselves and Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #219
The jury understood this post attacking me again. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #224
Riff. I have no jury blacklist. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #227
You should. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #264
What a steaming pile of bullshit. nt. polly7 Feb 2014 #229
TA, I got your analogy right away, and I think that your words were twisted for dramatic effect R B Garr Feb 2014 #269
I'd like to hear an explanation of this 'analogy' that equates a woman with a dog... Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #355
Oh, please. Nice try. R B Garr Feb 2014 #361
So pointing out that a post is sexist is 'sanctimonious crap'? Uh oh-kay... Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #374
Actually I did appreciate that you explained where you were coming from in relation R B Garr Feb 2014 #377
Now one question for you: what is meant by the implication someone is a man-hater? R B Garr Feb 2014 #388
Yes, you do have it wrong RainDog - it did not start with someone comparing Riff's behavior seaglass Feb 2014 #220
If you're going to spew sexist crap, at least be brave enough to own it. polly7 Feb 2014 #231
I have no idea what you are talking about. n/t seaglass Feb 2014 #235
thank you for giving me the benefit of the doubt RainDog Feb 2014 #285
So because someone called someone a name three months ago, that is why multiple Squinch Feb 2014 #230
It seems HOF owns the board with your powers. Who knew? Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #319
And one post calling someone a name 3 months ago will reverberate through the ages... Squinch Feb 2014 #320
I don't think it's necessary on either side RainDog Feb 2014 #331
This is a fair assessment. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #238
"...objectification theory itself is based upon shame-based views of the human body." nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #424
I was merely responding to what was said RainDog Feb 2014 #426
People are so often their own worst enemies. Getting bogged down in personal beefs nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #427
Yeah. RainDog Feb 2014 #428
Show me a thread in GD where men were lusting over women. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #93
I was wondering where that thread was too. Cleita Feb 2014 #259
They simply don't exist. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #271
Well said! greatlaurel Feb 2014 #95
That is some of the worst (best) bait trolling I've seen! AAO Feb 2014 #101
I have no interest in scoring points against either gender of human being. another_liberal Feb 2014 #105
As expected the Flying Squirrel is right! DeSwiss Feb 2014 #112
Direct All Insults at ME!!!!! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #127
Heh ... 1000words Feb 2014 #131
Not me. You can probably whip my ass. nt rrneck Feb 2014 #138
Not now. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #147
Surely, after being behooved repeatedly in such a fashion, now you have repented. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #141
And I've got just the church for Riff to repent at... Violet_Crumble Feb 2014 #167
A $12 "Fornicator" value-T? Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #168
Noooooo ...... polly7 Feb 2014 #174
"Sexy Christian love offerings" just creeped me out 1000words Feb 2014 #177
"Sexy Christian love offerings"? That phrase is about 10 billion kinds of wrong... nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #419
Thanks, and I love their gift shop! RiffRandell Feb 2014 #240
Miss Togar will teach you a lesson! edbermac Feb 2014 #142
Oh, she's tried. RiffRandell Feb 2014 #226
Ah, that reminds me . . . Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #189
Apparently the spooky IlluMANati ordered you to post it. Warren DeMontague Feb 2014 #351
Clear up my confusion. Union Scribe Feb 2014 #136
But, we have to allow the perpetually outraged among us to have something to focus on..... kiawah Feb 2014 #173
I think that the swimsuit photo arguments are only an outward manifestation of a deeper issue. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #208
women revert to traditional roles b/c the pay gap is so wide, usually RainDog Feb 2014 #209
I think age of marriage plays into it JustAnotherGen Feb 2014 #242
More men are in STEM careers, etc. too RainDog Feb 2014 #312
Too me these are the real feminist issues, not some model's bare fanny. Cleita Feb 2014 #261
That may be part of it lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #268
I think you have a social condition of work expectation RainDog Feb 2014 #297
It's not all social conditioning. lumberjack_jeff Feb 2014 #304
We don't disagree on those calculations RainDog Feb 2014 #310
and my experience is the opposite- because of maternity leave- the bread winning Moms I have known bettyellen Feb 2014 #344
I can certainly agree that vasectomies should be free to all. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #422
I know we've had our disagreements, but this is a good post. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #421
Trash Thread Feral Child Feb 2014 #232
One only needs to take a look at who is actually getting posts hidden. redgreenandblue Feb 2014 #256
Very true. Squinch Feb 2014 #324
Lets look at my day here yesterday shall we? Bennyboy Feb 2014 #263
After having a thread locked by EarlG BainsBane Feb 2014 #291
Well thanks for being honest - RBStevens Feb 2014 #300
So he admits to having a need to piss on DU women. DLevine Feb 2014 #305
and complains that they don't like being pissed on BainsBane Feb 2014 #314
I'm only surprised that he said so straight up. RBStevens Feb 2014 #328
A DU jury thought his post was just fine. 3-3 to leave. DLevine Feb 2014 #334
May I join you at the vomitorium? RBStevens Feb 2014 #338
Right after they piss on me Yes I do, I am full of fucking venom Bennyboy Feb 2014 #348
What a bizarre thought process. Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #362
I've long suspected most of our anti-woman posters are mad because they're not getting laid. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #316
+1 treestar Feb 2014 #363
OMG, Benny. If you seriously didn't understand that post was flamebait, you need Squinch Feb 2014 #317
I get the first part, where you made up a ridiculous story about being the innocent victim. Warren Stupidity Feb 2014 #323
This one part here is even more telling boston bean Feb 2014 #325
Well, yeah, then there's that too. RBStevens Feb 2014 #329
No woman gonna tell him what to do. boston bean Feb 2014 #330
... RBStevens Feb 2014 #333
Of course not. But she has just as much right to an opinion as he does. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #393
Now you see this is where you are so wrong it is not funny Bennyboy Feb 2014 #349
I don't think I got it wrong at all. Here is the stuff you say boston bean Feb 2014 #356
"some of my best friends are women/gay/black." geek tragedy Feb 2014 #357
And even if true, that doesn't relieve anyone of the responsibility to not be an asshole... nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #394
yes, that line was most telling for me as well. I was just going to copy and paste that sentence Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #359
"I really want to spit in the face of some posters here" Wow just wow! hrmjustin Feb 2014 #335
The level of hostility is completely unreasonable. WTF is this guy's problem? nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #395
He is gone now. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #430
Good! Screw him for giving Deadheads a bad name! nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #432
You "would really like to spit in the face of a couple of posters here" and "feel the need to piss bettyellen Feb 2014 #339
Tell us really who you'd like to spit in the face of. idendoit Feb 2014 #340
um Kali Feb 2014 #342
Y'know, rrneck Feb 2014 #345
He just got locked out of the thread. pintobean Feb 2014 #353
I dunno if he's gonna make it. nt rrneck Feb 2014 #354
wow -- what a load of crap fishwax Feb 2014 #347
Poster had been banned. hrmjustin Feb 2014 #365
Wow ... 1StrongBlackMan Feb 2014 #265
100th Rec. Think I'll skip the rest of the thread. nt Hekate Feb 2014 #309
Not me. AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #321
So do you have the capability to follow through with the threat? snooper2 Feb 2014 #358
the word Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2014 #367
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #158