Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
Sat Feb 15, 2014, 01:30 PM Feb 2014

progressives should counter Comcast-Time Warner merge with call for public high speed internet [View all]

Instead of playing defense and trying to undo the deal (or at least along with that), we should renew efforts to make the internet a public utility that cuts these bastards out of the loop entirely.

Many people are canceling their cable subscriptions anyway, which may be one of the things that prompted this merger--consolidating the power of an abusive, dying cartel that consistently overcharged customers and didn't deliver the a la carte services that even some Republican politicians tried to legislate them into providing.

They do however still have their high speed internet business.

Since they did and do such a poor job with their effective monopolies on cable TV (for decades you really had one option per location, and even now, it's just up to three or so if you count satellite too), why should we let them control the internet coming into our homes and businesses?

The internet was largely developed by the government at taxpayer expense, and the monopolies these companies enjoy is artificially created by regulation and legislation.

What the people give, the people can take away, and make the internet public again.

Local governments have experimented with government provided internet.

ISP's saw it as enough of a threat that they fought back and lobbied for laws and regulation to hobble it.

If it was done at the state or even national level, it might be harder for the telecom monopolies to fight back, and if you framed the issue correctly even many conservatives would back it like, "You how cable companies make you pay for 50 channels you'll never watch like Korean soap operas and Mongolian cricket matches? Now we can get even."

The price could be significantly below commercial ISP's and even include a modest profit because it would need to support the corporate profits and bloated executive salaries of private providers nor would it constantly be looking for more ways to scam money out of customers.

Would this be a good response to the mega telecomms along with trying to prevent the mass mergers?






6 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
YES: make their merger irrelevant and take away their profits with public internet
5 (83%)
NO: keep the internet private but do everything possible to block mergers and create competition instead of de facto monopolies
1 (17%)
OTHER (explain)
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»progressives should count...