General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Let's have a poll on JFK [View all]Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)My posts have been limited to the facts save in the case of a reply to a certain poster who thinks that ad hominem and guilt by association are acceptable tactics of argument. I haven't attempted to belittle anyone save those who choose to belittle others first, thanks.
And no, people who reject all of the physical evidence are in fact wild-eyed conspiracy theorists. They're no different than birthers. Doesn't matter if you show them forensics and ballistics and medical evidence, they claim it was faked and falsified and planted. This is pretty much the definition of wild-eyed conspiracy theorising. It's like claiming that the moon landings were shot on a soundstage in the Nevada desert and the chemical analyses of moon rocks were all faked by NASA.