Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You know for those who celebrate Christmas, [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)99. I get that it's very important to you to think that everyone accepts that.
"Not wanting to go there" is not the same thing as "accepting that the man lived".
Also, there's nowhere in the Dawkins piece that says "Jesus had an objective historical existence blah blah blah". Dawkins is talking about certain broad moral take-aways that are commonly attributed to Jesus, although some of them can be traced back to Buddha or other traditions as well.
He is not, in that article, weighing in on the historical debate.
But again, it's a pointless argument. "He did SO live!" Okay, whatever. There's no evidence outside the Bible. And the Bible is not exactly an infallible document, from where I sit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes the church picked the date to get people to stop celebrating pagan holidays.
hrmjustin
Nov 2013
#1
The only way Richard Dawkins would "know" Jesus existed, would be if he was alive 2000 years ago.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#93
Again, I do not believe that the objective existence of "Jesus" is even a front-burner topic for
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#97
I get that it's very important to you to think that everyone accepts that.
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#99
Do you accept that History is based upon objective evidence as opposed to popular consensus?
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#101
I don't know. However, I think there is more objective historical evidence to say so
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#107
Aww... this has got to be the most heart-warming exchange I've seen on DU in some time.
LAGC
Nov 2013
#118
Did you really need to start another Christmas thread, not that long after your first? (nt)
Nine
Nov 2013
#19
If this is all you have to live for it's not people who celebrate X-mas who have the problem.
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2013
#33
The other posters in this thread seem to notice a pattern with your OPs.
Nuclear Unicorn
Nov 2013
#82
That is not true for Christians. Christmas is about the birth of Jesus Christ.
hrmjustin
Nov 2013
#117
I know a shit load of crazy ass fundies who swear to God that if their church says Jesus was born on
gopiscrap
Nov 2013
#59
You're like the kid who reminds the teacher she forgot to assign homework for the weekend nt.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Nov 2013
#58
Because no one who enjoys Christmas gives a flying you know what nt.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
Nov 2013
#61
SO which historians are actively concerned with the objective historical "existence" of Jesus
Warren DeMontague
Nov 2013
#79