Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
26. Changes in taxes on higher income due to the ACA:
Sun Oct 27, 2013, 03:44 PM
Oct 2013
Below is a summary of several of the tax law changes that are effective beginning in 2013 and 2014.

Increased Medicare Hospital Insurance Tax

For tax years beginning in 2013, the ACA provides for an increase in the Medicare hospital insurance (HI) tax rate. The HI tax is one of two taxes that comprise the Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes imposed on employers. The other FICA tax is the Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance tax. FICA taxes are imposed separately on employers and employees. Self-employed individuals pay an alternative tax, which is essentially equal to both the employer and employee portion of the FICA taxes. Employers pay FICA taxes on wages paid in connection with employment, while employees pay FICA taxes on wages received. The HI tax rate is presently equal to 1.45 percent on wages paid and is not subject to a wage cap.
Beginning in 2013, the ACA increases the HI tax rate for certain “high-income” individuals. An additional HI tax is imposed at a rate of 0.9 percent on taxpayers with wages above: (1) $250,000 and filing a joint return; (2) $125,000 if married filing separately; and (3) $200,000 for all others. For employers, the increased HI taxes will require greater compliance monitoring because of the introduction of graduated rates. In other words, employers will need to be prepared to closely monitor wages.


Surtax on Non-Wage Income for High-Income Individuals

For tax years commencing in 2013, the ACA introduces a surtax on certain high-income individuals, which is imposed at 3.8 percent. The base of the surtax is the lesser of either “net investment income” or the portion of a taxpayer’s modified adjusted gross receipts that exceeds the threshold amounts. The threshold amounts are $250,000 for joint returns, $125,000 for married filing separately and $200,000 for all other taxpayers.

http://www.casinoenterprisemanagement.com/articles/september-2012/fees-and-taxes-learning-aca

There is more there; the search results I am getting are aggravating. Most of them are commerical, so I apologize. The official sources are being pushed so far down in the results that sometimes they do not show up at all.

But these are things that progressives have wanted for a long time. And they were all tucked into the ACA, which is one of the many reasons that the GOP hates it so much. JMHO.

Leave MY Social Secuity ALONE. PearliePoo2 Oct 2013 #1
Is this sarcasm or did you not read past the title of the thread? Revanchist Oct 2013 #2
Yes, I agree with what you wrote and suggested! PearliePoo2 Oct 2013 #6
I think that's important: "entitlements" per se aren't a sacred cow Recursion Oct 2013 #3
It looks like C was set up to appease the 1 % for having to BlueToTheBone Oct 2013 #34
Carried Interest Ruby the Liberal Oct 2013 #4
Those aren't the ones on the table but the ones that can Cleita Oct 2013 #5
Hey, Senator Cruz said that we should cut entitlements to help balance the budget Revanchist Oct 2013 #11
I agree with you but again no one is putting those on the Cleita Oct 2013 #13
I think you are buying in to the Republican meaning of entitlement, which is incorrect. cui bono Oct 2013 #7
Well in my post I did label all of them as subsidies. Revanchist Oct 2013 #12
Maybe, but even then you're still equating the two which is incorrect. cui bono Oct 2013 #15
As I have explained in other posts rock Oct 2013 #28
Axe the Mortgage Interest Deduction for anyone making more than $100,000. BluegrassStateBlues Oct 2013 #8
The Mortgage Interest Deduction itself should have a cap rather than being tied to income. yourout Oct 2013 #31
Those not qualify as entitlements. nt Hutzpa Oct 2013 #9
Farm subsidies are definitely entitlements, as are some energy subsidies (nt) Recursion Oct 2013 #14
How so? cui bono Oct 2013 #16
They're legally defined mandatory spending Recursion Oct 2013 #18
Not in the political climate of today. cui bono Oct 2013 #19
Words mean things. Recursion Oct 2013 #20
I edited my post while you were posting and added this... cui bono Oct 2013 #22
Well according the some members in Congress Hutzpa Oct 2013 #17
I prefer to call SS and Medicare "earned benefits." SunSeeker Oct 2013 #10
The OP has used the term wrongfully, and by the way, SS and Medicare ARE entitlements duffyduff Oct 2013 #27
while i agree with the sentiment nadinbrzezinski Oct 2013 #21
Entitlements for the wealthy, including large corporations, are, have been, and will continue indepat Oct 2013 #23
We need to threaten Reid and others like him with primary challenges emsimon33 Oct 2013 #24
Look up the definition of 'Entitlement' GeorgeGist Oct 2013 #25
Changes in taxes on higher income due to the ACA: freshwest Oct 2013 #26
subsidies daybranch Oct 2013 #29
We DO need to make cuts to Social Security. penndragon69 Oct 2013 #30
Well if you are entitled to it it means you earned it. zeemike Oct 2013 #32
You should copy/paste to his contact page ffr Oct 2013 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senator Reid is wrong, en...»Reply #26