Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HealthCare.gov pricing feature can be off the mark [View all]villager
(26,001 posts)126. EmoProg Griefers, perhaps!?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
145 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Failure is not an option as we won't be able to delay the individual mandate for political reasons
dkf
Oct 2013
#11
Let me add a different scenario, in addition to the technical problems
Puzzledtraveller
Oct 2013
#20
Yes I think it's a mess but D's will have to live with it, like vets in the VA system.
dkf
Oct 2013
#27
Yes. We can't let this fail, and criticisms of those who are saying we need to get urgent about this
Yo_Mama
Oct 2013
#58
Any price quote should be honored. Even if that means the federal government covering the difference
Gravitycollapse
Oct 2013
#2
So you admit you disagree with the vast majority here....yet you continue to hang around and force
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#9
Unfortunately they aren't a small minority. Vocal yes, but unfortunately not small n/t
progree
Oct 2013
#16
"I don't go around griefing..." Some of us choose not to be ostriches. Some of us want to know
progree
Oct 2013
#68
Ostrich? Hardly.....I am well informed....thank you...this is Democratic Underground...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#76
Giving a 64 year old the rate of a 50 year old is not "off" to you????????????? half the rate is
progree
Oct 2013
#89
Would you say the same thing if it was a Republican admin "misunderestimating" its costs
progree
Oct 2013
#94
Seems to me the recent swarm of corporate sockbots is here to stop the general movement to the left
Zorra
Oct 2013
#92
I just think people should know about this problem so they aren't blindsided at the office
progree
Oct 2013
#98
Look up there on the top left....see what that says? Democratic Underground...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#28
"states the actual prices could be lower, but it makes no mention that they could be higher"
progree
Oct 2013
#5
I thought the quote it gives was merely an estimate. The Corporate Media is reaching!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Oct 2013
#13
All the Obama haters out in full force pretending to be fair minded.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Oct 2013
#17
I'm an Obama admirer and worked very hard to get him elected. So stop lying about me.
progree
Oct 2013
#18
So you are saying people are too stupid to understand "average prices"?
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#40
thats where an average price comes in....you do realize this involves HUNDREDS of plans...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#52
these are averages....Do you not understand AVERAGES....and these are quotes...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#78
Your "figures" do NOT include the tax credit...that is WHY it COULD be lower...
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#136
In Rochester, MN there are a whole lot of plans, but all from one and only one insurance co.
progree
Oct 2013
#122
If this was some Republican program, and they were grossly underestimating their cost "estimates"
progree
Oct 2013
#23
Fine, but I still don't get how it is a "bit silly" for the media to report on it
progree
Oct 2013
#36
Because it is clearly a quick and temporary insert while they get things going...
Demo_Chris
Oct 2013
#101
If the contractor gave you a 1/3 to 1/2 off estimate to get their foot in the door?
progree
Oct 2013
#45
I doubt low income people or those with pre-existing conditions are paying more under ACA.
Hoyt
Oct 2013
#35
Taxpayers will be picking up the subidies; rates will increase due to high-cost patients in the pool
FarCenter
Oct 2013
#46
Assuming the "non-patients", i.e. the healthy young, sign up in sufficient numbers. We shall see. nt
progree
Oct 2013
#50
Do you have any data that these are the young and healthy ones? I suspect, aside from the just
progree
Oct 2013
#62
No. Some people think it is a problem when healthcare.gov is estimating a 49 yo based on a 27 yo
progree
Oct 2013
#86
Okay Ostrich...you would rather have the current Heathcare system...duly noted.
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#88
"Okay Ostrich.you would rather have the current Heathcare system...duly noted." OK Liar
progree
Oct 2013
#97
Show me anywhere I said or indicated the old system is better, or that I don't want the ACA to work.
progree
Oct 2013
#124
It was a simple question, I'm sorry if simple questions are "word salad" to you, Sarah n/t
progree
Oct 2013
#82
The "non-patients" are the former uninsured getting the high subsidies from the taxpayers.
FarCenter
Oct 2013
#51
Not true....But I suppose it is much cheaper for the uninsured to just go to the emergency room
VanillaRhapsody
Oct 2013
#57
I'm willing to pay a bit more to expand coverage to 30 million. But from what I've seen so far,
Hoyt
Oct 2013
#54